Case law

Wulff v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts

380 F. Supp. 1137 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · May 31, 1974

Defendant, State Board, is an administrative board created by Missouri state statutes charged with the licensing of physicians. … In both Roe v. Wade and Doe v.

Stockwell v. Board of Zoning Adjust. of Kansas City

434 S.W.2d 785 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1968

Louis Public Service Co. v. Public Service Commission, Mo., 291 S.W.2d 95 ; Dunbar v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, Mo.App., 387 S.W.2d 164 . … Carroll Construction Company v. Kansas City, Mo.App., 278 S.W.2d 817, 821 ; Colt v. Bernard, Mo.App., 279 S.W.2d 527, 531 ; Isgrigg v. Board of Trustees of Policemen’s & Firemen’s Pen.

Krekeler v. St. Louis County Board of Zoning Adjustment

422 S.W.2d 265 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 11, 1967

In Fleming v. Moore Bros. … Jamison v. Zausch, 227 Mo. 406 , 126 S.W. 1023, 1027 ; Lucas v. Murphy, 348 Mo. 1078 , 156 S.W.2d 686, 690 .

Kansas City v. Bacon

147 Mo. 259 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 23, 1898

Brown offered to establish by the oral testimony of Kessler, secretary of the park board, and Gus. O. L. Sauer and Á. C. … Louis v.

Mason v. Whyte

660 S.W.2d 383 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1983

Elsberry Drainage Dist. v. Seerley, 329 Mo. 1237 , 49 S.W.2d 162, 166 (1932); Brown v. Chaney, 256 Mo. 219 , 165 S.W. 335, 336 (1914). … The use of “Sub.” for subdivision would not make the description defective. *387 “Add.” has been held sufficient to indicate “addition”, Brown v.

Brown v. Precythe

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 8, 2019

Outside of noting that it is a juvenile case, the Board Action Sheet does not discuss Brown’s youth or immaturity at the time of the underlying offense. Doc. 138-35 (Board Action Sheet for Norman Brown). … See Williams v.

KV Pharmaceutical Co. v. Missouri State Board of Pharmacy

43 S.W.3d 306 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 2001

This Court examines the record in the light most favorable to the Board’s discipline. Mendelsohn v. State Board of Reg. For Healing Arts, 3 S.W.3d 783, 786-87 (Mo. banc 1999). … This Court defers to the Board’s specialized knowledge of drug distributorships, as the Board is better equipped to determine the gravity of the infractions and the appropriate sanction. Tadrus v.

Moto, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of St. Louis

88 S.W.3d 96 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2002

This appeal follows. 2 On appeal, we review the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Board of Adjustment and not the circuit court. State ex rel. Sander v. … Teefey v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, Mo., 24 S.W.3d 681, 684 (Mo. banc 2000)).

Brown v. Anderson

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 30, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION THEODIS BROWN, … Background On July 8, 2019, pro se plaintiff Theodis Brown removed this personal injury action from the 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis. See Brown v.

State v. Jonagan

311 Mo. 540 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 22, 1925

[State v. Richardson, 98 Mo. 564 ; United States v. Bayaud, 23 F. 721 ; People v. Manriquez, 206 P. 63 -4; Monahan v. State, 34 N.E. 967 ; State v. Yates, 52 Kan. 566 ; Miller v. State, 254 S.W. 487 .] II. … Instead of being paroled he was sent to the penitentary for five years. (5) In State v.

State ex rel. Farmers Bank v. Township Board

188 Mo. App. 266 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1915

That proviso does give the board a discretion—it does authorize the board, in proper instances, to reject a bid that on its face appears to be the best, which, in reality, is not; Reagan v. … But the discretion meant is “a sound legal discretion, not a capricious, arbitrary, or oppressive one;” State ex rel. v. County Court, 41 Mo. 221, 226 ; State ex rel. v. Adcock, 206 Mo. 550, 556 ; State ex rel. v.

Brown v. Anderson

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Oct 1, 2019

See, e.g., Porter v. … See Sheffield v. Janssen Pharm., Inc., No. 4:17-CV-1254-RLW, 2018 WL 280786, *1 (E.D. Mo.

Butherus v. Brown

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 26, 2019

Silinzy v. Williams, 247 S.W.3d 595, 598 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008) (citing State ex rel. Illinois Farmers Ins. Co. v. Gallagher, 811 S.W.2d 353, 354 (Mo. 1991)). … Midwest Acceptance Corp. v. Blount, 777 S.W.2d 645, 647 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989) (quoting Colter v. Luke, 129 Mo. App. 702, 609 (1908)).

Olds v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

162 S.W.3d 33 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2005

City of Kansas City v. Piercy, 97 S.W.3d 513, 514 (Mo.App.2002). Failure to comply with these rules constitutes grounds for dismissing the appeal. Id. … Here, Olds’ second point alleges error committed by the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole.

State ex rel. Branum v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

85 S.W.3d 35 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 2002

The burden was on the Branums to demonstrate to the Board that the variance requests should be granted. See Behrens v. Ebenrech, 784 S.W.2d 827, 829 (Mo.App.1990); Ogawa v. … Klawuhn v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment of City of St. Joseph, 952 S.W.2d 725, 729 (Mo.App.1997); State ex rel. Holly Inv. Co. v.

St. Charles County v. "A Joint Board or Commission"

184 S.W.3d 161 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2006

A Joint Board or Commission (“Joint Board”) and North East Community Action Board (“NECAC”) appeal from a judgment of the trial court sustaining St. Charles County’s motion for summary judgment. … Ellis v. Williams, 312 S.W.2d 97, 105 (Mo.1958). In Union Mkt. Merchants Assoc. Inc. v. City of St.

Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Spinden

798 S.W.2d 472 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1990

Stores Co. v. Ryan, 699 S.W.2d at 136 . The phrase “professionally oriented communication” is vague. Both the appellant Board and the respondent Spinden rely on State ex rel. Great Am. Ins. Co. v. … Stores Co. v. Ryan, 699 S.W.2d 134 (Mo.App.1985); Enke v. Anderson, 733 S.W.2d 462 (Mo.App.1987); See also: State ex rel. Cain v. Barker, 540 S.W.2d 50 (Mo. banc 1976); State ex rel. Faith Hosp. v.

Kelly v. City of St. Louis, Board of Adjustment

745 S.W.2d 177 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1987

Such petition shall be presented to the court within thirty days after the filing of the decision in the office of the board. (Emphasis added). The trial court, relying on Cohen v. … See State ex rel Board of Zoning Appeals of Indianapolis v. Grant, 246 Ind. 317 , 204 N.E.2d 658 (1965) (holding that failure to file a verified petition as required by statute left the court without jurisdiction).

State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. McDonagh

123 S.W.3d 146 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 23, 2003

V, secs. 10, 18. II. … De Weese v.

Lagud v. Kansas City Missouri Board of Police Commissioners

272 S.W.3d 285 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 2008

Substantial evidence is defined as “ ‘evidence which has probative force on the issues, and from which the trier of facts can reasonably decide the case.’ ” White, 217 S.W.3d at 388 (quoting Brown v. … Cochran v. Bd. of Educ. of Mexico Sch. Dist. No. 59, 815 S.W.2d 55, 59 (Mo.App. E.D.1991). There was evidence to support the Board’s determination, and *292 as a result, we must uphold the Board’s findings.