Case law

White v. State Board of Tax Appeals

123 N.J.L. 350 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1939

The County Board affirmed the assessment, and there was a further appeal to the State Board, which was heard before one of the commissioners of that board. At the hearing Mr. … Garrett v. Garrett, 86 N. J. Eq. 293, 299; Doremus v. Doremus, 88 Id. 256; Gershonowitz v. Neider, 95 Id. 580; In re Judges, 101 Id. 9, 11; Caruso v. Caruso, 102 Id. 393, 401; Etz v. Weinmann, 106 Id. 209, 225.

Gibbs v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

101 N.J.L. 371 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1925

The Camden county board of taxation increased the assessment to $65,000. The landowner then appealed to the state board of taxes and assessment which affirmed the action of the Camden county board of taxation. … Royal Manufacturing Co. v. Rahway, 75 N. J. L. 416; Millville Water Co. v. City of Millville, 84 Id. 411. Under section 11 of the Gertiorari act of 1903 (Comp.

Smith v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

48 N.J. Eq. 627 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1891

The bill was filed by the board of chosen freeholders of Essex county, the respondent, against appellant and the Newark City National Bank. … For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Mague, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Whitaker — 9. For affirmance — Depue, Knapp, Smith — 3.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

40 N.J.L. 302 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1878

State, Bradley, pros., v. Hammonton, 9 Vroom 430 ; State, Lewis, pros., v. Freeholders of Hudson Co., 8 Vroom 254 . The prosecutors urge that there is a want of power in the board to do this work. … This conclusion is in accordance with that reached by the Vice-Chancellor, in McKinley v. Chosen Freeholders of Union County, 2 Stew. 164 . The proceeding of the board is affirmed, with costs.

Board of Health v. Schwarz Bros.

84 N.J.L. 500 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 7, 1913

It is admitted that the defendants slaughtered live horses at the establishment in Kearny, and had no license from the board of health. … The object in this act is even more remote from commerce than the regulations sustained in Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U. S. 1 ; Geer v. Connecticut, 161 Id. 519; Capital City Dairy Co. v.

Del Pomo v. Board of Trustees

252 N.J. Super. 430 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 19, 1991

Under our standard of review, we will not overturn the decision of the Board unless we find its decision is arbitrary, unreasonable or capricious. See Henry v. … Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 97 N.J. 313, 327 , 478 A.2d 742 (1984); Mayflower Securities Co., Inc. v. Bureau of Securities, 64 N.J. 85, 92-93 , 312 A.2d 497 (1973); Barone v.

Royal Liquor Distributors & Importers v. Brown-forman Distillers Corp.

97 N.J. 644 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1984

Hilkevich v. New Jersey State Parole Board

231 N.J. 313 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 14, 2017

Schwarz Bros. v. Board of Health

83 N.J.L. 81 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 8, 1912

Traction Co. v. Elizabeth, 29 Vroom 619 ; Trenton Horse Railroad Co. v. Trenton, 24 Id. 132; Wysc v. … Board of Health v. New York, &c., Railroad Co., 48 Vroom 15 .

Sadlock v. Board of Education of Carlstadt

137 N.J.L. 85 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Apr 1, 1948

the medical inspector appointed by the board of education that the teacher or pupil is an unfit subject for vaccination.” … Beach, 155 Ind. 121; Morris v. City of Columbus, 102 Ca. 792; State v. Hay, 126 N. C. 999 ; Abeel v. Clark, 84 Cal. 226 ; Bissell v. Davidson, 65 Conn. 183 ; Hazen v. Strong, 2 Vt. 427 ; Duffield v.

State v. Essex Public Road Board

46 N.J.L. 126 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1884

Ropes v. Essex Public Road Board, 11 Vroom 64 . *128 The second reason is because the damages assessed included sums not legally assessable. … L.,p. 714,) and this was so decided in the case of Ropes v. Essex Public Road Board, 11 Vroom 64 .

Electrolux Corporation v. Board of Review

129 N.J.L. 157 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 18, 1942

The Board of Review resolved the issue in the affirmative, and the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment. These respondents held contracts with appellant similar to the one considered in the case of Electrolux Corp. v. … Board of Review, 129 N. J. L. 154, a companion case this day decided.

Trantino v. New Jersey State Parole Board

296 N.J. Super. 437 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 15, 1997

State Parole Bd. v. … Jenkins v. Fauver, supra; Dominique v. Weld, 73 F.3d 1156 (1st Cir.1996); O’Neal v.

Parsippany Hills Associates v. Rent Leveling Board

97 N.J. 643 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 19, 1984

Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Sharpless

83 N.J.L. 443 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 18, 1912

This is an action of ejectment brought by the board of freeholders of Camden county against Jesse Sharpless and Allen R. Sharpless, to recover possession of a strip of land in the city and county of Camden. … South Amboy v. New York and, Long Branch Railroad Co., 37 Vroom 623. Under the pleadings in the ease, therefore, the judgment under review was entirely justified by the facts agreed upon.

Fisher v. New Jersey State Parole Board

303 N.J. Super. 229 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 10, 1997

Smith v. Angelone, 111 F.3d 1126, 1131 (4th Cir.1997); Anderson v. Singletary, 111 F.3d 801, 806 (11th Cir.1997); United States v. Simmonds, 111 F.3d 737, 744 (10th Cir.1997); Naddi v. … VI, sec. 5, para. 4 (1947)) the Board’s actions are *239 always judicially reviewable for arbitrariness.” Monks v. N.J.

Fornarotto v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners

105 N.J.L. 28 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 22, 1928

Alexander Dye Works v. Roufosse, 57 N. J. L. 700; Campbell v. Delaware *33 and Atlantic Telephone Co., 70 Id. 195; Bowell v. The Public Service Corporation, 77 Id. 231. … This obligation of the- board of public utility commissioners is made manifest by the language used in the case of Motor Transport Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, 104 N. J.

National Labor Relations Board v. Frazier

144 F.R.D. 650 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 9, 1992

(“Control Services”) with the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB”). Frazier, 966 F.2d at 814. … The material facts in this case are largely undisputed and are set forth at length in National Labor Relations Board v. Frazier, 966 F.2d 812 (3d Cir.1992).

Board of License & Excise v. Closson

49 N.J.L. 482 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1887

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Knapp, Magie, Parker, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Cole, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 12. For reversal — None.

Yellock v. New Jersey State Parole Board

230 N.J. 570 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 11, 2017