Case law

Lannay v. Wilson

30 Md. 536 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 1, 1869

Baghdikian v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Ramsey

247 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 28, 1991

However, a zoning board, as any administrative agency, cannot be equated with courts. Kramer v. Board of Adj., Sea Girt, 45 N.J. 268, 284, 289 , 212 A. 2d 153 (1965). … In Peoples Trust Co. of Bergen Cty. v. Board of Adj. of Bor. of Hasbrouck Heights, 60 N.J.

Wynes v. Kaiser Permanente Hospitals

936 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 28, 2013

Defendants rely on Brown v. City of Tucson, 336 F.3d 1181, 1190 (9th Cir.2003), in arguing that a hostile work environment claim is not actionable under the ADA. (ECF No. 71' at 15.) … See Earl v.

McCray v. SALAH UDDIN SHAMS, MD, SC

224 Ill. App. 3d 999 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 10, 1992

Shams was not board certified. … situation in Ward v.

Clarke v. Board of Appeals of Nahant

338 Mass. 473 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 3, 1959

See Gordon v. Guernsey, 316 Mass. 106, 108 . See also Davis & O’Connor Co. v. Shell Oil Co. Inc. 311 Mass. 401, 403 . … See Corbett v. Derman Shoe Co., ante, 405, 409.

Miles v. Howard University

653 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2016

Allen v. Johnson, 795 F.3d 34, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Brady v. Office of Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 494 (D.C. Cir. 2008)). … See Anderson v.

Matter of Brown v. Brown

127 A.D.3d 1180 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2015

Eschbach, 56 NY2d at 171-172 ; Kramer v Griffith, 119 AD3d 655, 656 [2014]; Matter of Mitchell v Mitchell, 113 AD3d 775, 776 [2014]). … ; Matter of Lane v Lane, 68 AD3d 995, 997 [2009]).

States Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Permanente Steamship Corporation, a Corporation

231 F.2d 82 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 6, 1956

As observed in Oriental Trading & Transport Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 2 Cir., 173 F.2d 108 , certiorari denied Gulf Oil Corp. v. M/V The John A. … Brown, 1949, 337 U.S. 919 , 69 S.Ct. 1162 , 93 L.Ed. 1728 : “The purpose of * * * all rules touching signals * * * is to advise the ship to which the signal is addressed that she can no longer rely upon the signalling ship

Brown v. Brown

193 Minn. 211 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Jan 4, 1935

Brown (now Louise M. … See Dacey v. Dacey, 179 Minn. 520 , 229 N. W. 868 .

Advance at Branchburg II, LLC v. Township Of branchburg Board of Adjustment

433 N.J. Super. 247 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 1, 2013

Nevertheless, we "recognize the board's knowledge of local circumstances and accord deference to its interpretation." Fallone, supra, 369 N.J. Super. at 562; accord DePetro v. … That determination will govern whether we apply the Sica or Medici standard to our review of the Board's actions. Advance relies on our decision in Homes of Hope, Inc. v.

State v. School Bd. of Sarasota County

561 So. 2d 549 · Supreme Court of Florida · Apr 26, 1990

561 So.2d 549 (1990) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF SARASOTA COUNTY, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, Appellee. STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. … State v.

Brown v. Brown

211 Ark. 241 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 10, 1947

The statute is discussed at length in Davis v. Cullums, 205 Ark. 390 , 168 S. W. 2d 1103 . In 1932 John Oliver Brown married Martha, a widow with two sons and a daughter. … Corney v. Corney, 97 Ark. 117 , 133 S.

Baker v. Hutson

333 Ill. App. 3d 486 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 20, 2002

Sharon Pelton, a board-certified, emergency room physician. Dr. Pelton testified that she evaluated plaintiff on January 23, 1996. … Brown v. Baker, 88 Ill. 2d 81, 85 , 430 N.E.2d 1126, 1127 (1981). In Illinois, the question of damages is peculiarly one of fact for the jury. Flynn v. Vancil, 41 Ill. 2d 236, 240 , 242 N.E.2d 237, 240 (1968).

Charter Communications Holding Co. v. Dept. of Rev.

24 Or. Tax 88 · Oregon Tax Court · Mar 30, 2020

The court, applying the framework set out in Tuckenberry v. Board of Parole, 365 Or 640, 451 P3d 227 (2019), held that issue exhaustion was not required in this case. … Would they go to the board in every county? You know, I’ve got twenty-five miles of wire or pipe in your county and I’ve 98 Charter Communications Holding Co. v. Dept. of Rev.

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown Co.

160 F.2d 449 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Mar 5, 1947

See International Ass’n of Machinists v. Labor Board, 311 U.S. 72 , 61 S.Ct. 83 , 85 L.Ed. 50 ; H. J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board, 311 U.S. 514 , 61 S.Ct. 320 , 85 L.Ed. 309 ; National Labor Board v. … Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584 , 61 S.Ct. 358 , 85 L.Ed. 368 ; New Idea v. Labor Board, 7 Cir., 117 F.2d 517 ; National Labor Board v. Moench Tanning Co., 2 Cir., 121 F.2d 951 ; National Labor Board v.

Brown v. GEER-BROWN

756 N.W.2d 481 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · Aug 13, 2008

756 N.W.2d 481 (2008) BROWN v. GEER-BROWN. No. 07-1635. Court of Appeals of Iowa. August 13, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed as Modified and Remanded.

Devereux v. Berger

264 Md. 20 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 14, 1972

In Metropolitan Acceptance Corporation v. Irving D. Berger, No. 204, Sept. … In Devereux v.

Lauderdale County School Board v. Brown ex rel. A.B.

106 So. 3d 807 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Jan 31, 2013

The matter was pending before the school board, and if the board approved the recommendation, the students could request a hearing before the school board to continue the suspension until such hearing occurred. … On July 25, 2012, the youth court denied the board’s and superintendent’s motion to stay pending appeal, and the school board moved this Court to impose a stay on the underlying judgment until a final decision on the merits

Santiago v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 16, 2024

(first citing Browne v. State, 102 So. 546, 546-47 4 (Fla. 1924); and then citing Langon v. State, 791 So. 2d 1105, 1113 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)). … Smith v. State, 525 So. 2d 477, 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (first citing Loren v. State, 518 So. 2d 342, 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); and then citing Brown v. State, 426 So. 2d 76, 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)).

Sensing v. Harris

217 Ariz. 261 · Court of Appeals of Arizona · Dec 20, 2007

See also Chicago v. … For example, a professional licensing board may have discretion to deny a license, but it may not delay an application for an extended period when the statutes require it to act. Eastman v.