Case law

People v. Brown

205 A.D.2d 791 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 27, 1994

v Bigelow, supra). … Johnson, supra; People v Bigelow, supra).

People v. Brown

130 A.D.2d 500 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 4, 1987

We have considered the issues raised in the defendant’s pro se supplemental brief and find them to be without merit (see, United States v Crews, 445 US 463 ). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

176 A.D.2d 1232 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 4, 1991

Brown v. Blumenfeld

9 N.Y.3d 1026 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 2008

People v. Brown

252 A.D.2d 598 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 2, 1998

At this time, the People indicated that there were no Sandoval, Molineux (see, People v Molineux, 168 NY 264 ) or Ventimiglia (see, People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350 ) issues. … While CPL 240.43 requires disclosure of material “of which the prosecutor has knowledge”, it does not preclude consideration of after-acquired material (see, People v Brown, 202 AD2d 266, 267 , lv denied 83 NY2d 964 ).

People v. Brown

283 A.D.2d 312 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 2001

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 ). … Defendant’s application pursuant to Batson v Kentucky ( 476 US 79 ) was properly denied.

People v. Brown

235 A.D.2d 344 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 28, 1997

Martinez, 82 NY2d 436 ; see also, People v Rivera, 237 AD2d 178 ). … should be followed (People v Joseph, 85 AD2d 546 ).

Brown v. Rotenberg

268 F. Supp. 3d 445 · District Court, W.D. New York · Aug 3, 2017

WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Abdullah-rafa Brown (“Plaintiff’), proceeding pro se, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , asserting constitutional violations arising out of the Defendants … Bedoya v. Coughlin, 91 F.3d 349, 351-52 (2d Cir. 1996); Frazier v. Coughlin, 81 F.3d 313, 316 (2d Cir. 1996).

People v. Brown

24 A.D.2d 740 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 14, 1965

Furthermore, some of the court are of the opinion the admission of the confession of the codefendant requires reversal in the interests of justice under People v. Donovan (13 N Y 2d 148). Concur — Breitel, J.

People v. Brown

46 A.D.3d 305 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 11, 2007

People v. Brown

166 A.D.2d 762 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 18, 1990

v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146 ; see also, People v Benjamin, 151 AD2d 685, 686 ). … The prosecution provided the evidence to defense counsel immediately after its discovery so that defendant had sufficient time to effectively incorporate it into his defense (see, People v Brown, 67 NY2d 555, 559 , cert denied

People v. Brown

181 A.D.2d 1041 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 13, 1992

Bailey, 159 AD2d 1009, 1010 ; People v Betances, 145 AD2d 961 ). … Further support for the inference that the gun did not belong to defendant is found in the fact that the gun was unloaded and no ammunition for it was found in the apartment (see, People v Bailey, supra).

Brown v. Cooper

65 How. Pr. 126 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 15, 1883

People v. Brown

121 A.D.2d 326 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 24, 1986

v Lewis, 68 AD2d 862 ; People v Richards, 67 AD2d 893 ). … People v Skinner, 57 AD2d, at p 786 ).

Brown v. . Richter

144 N.Y. 706 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1895

Brown v. Sherman

16 A.D. 579 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1897

The bill of sale bears date the 11th day of April, 1883, and one of. the considerations for the transfer of the property mentioned therein was the agreement of Clark to board and care for the vendor, Brown, and his family … Brown read the bill of sale- and knew its contents.

Bratone v. Conforti-Brown

150 A.D.3d 1068 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 2017

The plaintiffs Arthur Bratone, Ronald Bratone, and Steven Bratone collectively own 50% of VSI’s stock, and the defendants, Linda Conforti-Brown and Martha Conforti, own the remaining 50% of VSI’s stock. … State of New York, 234 NY 309, 316 [1922]; see Goldschmidt v Ford St., LLC, 58 AD3d 803, 805 [2009]; Koudellou v Sakalis, 29 AD3d at 640 ; Kings Park Yacht Club, Inc. v State of New York, 26 AD3d 357 [2006]; Forsyth v Clauss

People v. Brown

283 A.D.2d 437 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 7, 2001

Gray, 86 NY2d 10 ; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 ). … The defendant’s contention that he received ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 ; People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796 ; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 ; People v Wicker, 229

Bischoffsheim v. Brown

29 F. 341 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Dec 23, 1886

The case of Coit v. North Carolina Gold Amalgamating Co., 9 Fed. Rep. 577, is cited as an authority in this direction. Notwithstanding this authority it must be held that such practice cannot *342 be sanctioned. … Bank v. State Nat. Bank, 3 Cliff. 201 . He is bound to obey the writ and be ready to produce the papers in obedience to the summons.

People v. Brown

174 A.D.2d 842 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 1991

the claim that he was represented by counsel on another pending charge of which the police had knowledge and to show that at the time of the interrogation he was represented by counsel on the earlier charge (see, People v … that the right to counsel is not violated where a defendant is questioned by the police solely on matters unrelated to a prior pending charge even if the defendant was represented by counsel on the prior charge (People v