Case law

Inhabitants of Durham

117 Me. 131 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 21, 1918

Jones v. Oxford, 45 Maine, 428. … Jones v. Oxford, supra. The joint board is not a permanent court having records of its own, requiring its proceedings to be recorded in a County Court. The statutes, R.

Wytrwal v. Mowles

886 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, D. Maine · May 5, 1995

V at 34. b. Lander Leroy W. Lander, Jr. recalled attending a school board meeting in early 1992 at which a teacher discussed special education. Tr. Vol. V at 43. … V at 17. 18 . DeSimone testified that she did not recall talking to Voci about Wytrwal's presence at the school board meeting. Tr. Vol. V at 19. 19 .

State of Maine v. Stephen J. Tucker Sr.

117 A.3d 595 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 2015

State v. … Co. v.

Sickra v. Small

87 Me. 493 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 4, 1895

Stone v. Varney, 7 Met. 86 ; Leonard v. Allen, 11 Cush. 241 ; Bodwell v. Swan, 8 Pick. 376 ; Clark v. Brown, 116 Mass. 505 ; Root v. King, 7 Cow. 613 ; Lamos v. Snell, 6 N. H. 413; Bridgman v. … In the recent case of Clark v. Brown, 116 Mass. 505 , the plaintiff was charged with larceny.

State v. Williams

52 A.3d 911 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 3, 2012

See State v. … At the July proceeding, George again described the three assailants as wearing a brown jersey, a blue t-shirt, and a burgundy t-shirt; however, George stated that the brown jersey was similar to a football jersey with writing

Richard Cayer v. Town of Madawaska

148 A.3d 707 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 15, 2016

See Bryant v. … P’ship v.

Inhabitants of Norway v. Willis

105 Me. 54 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 30, 1908

Ellsworth v. Brown, 53 Maine, 519, 522. See Martin v. Portland, 81 Maine, 293, 297. … Watson, 98 Maine, 379, 383; Creamer v. Bremen, 91 Maine, 508, 513; Ellsworth v. Brown, 53 Maine, 519, 521, 523. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, there must be, Judgment for defendant..

Morey v. Maine Central Railroad

125 Me. 272 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 29, 1926

Ashton v. B. & M. R. R., supra. Murch v. … Ashton v. B. & M. R. R., supra. P. & R. Ry. v. Marland, supra. Cin., N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Thompson, 236 Fed. 1 .

INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF PITTSFIELD v. Chandler

457 A.2d 1122 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 4, 1983

The Superior Court remanded the case to the Pittsfield Zoning Board of Appeals, directing a further remand to the Town’s Planning Board for a hearing on the special exception permit application originally filed by the Defendant … Harris Baking Company v. Maine Employment Security Commission, 457 A.2d 427, 428 (Me.1983); Mac-Dougall v. MacDougall, 403 A.2d 783, 784 (Me.1979). Accordingly, the entry is: Appeal dismissed. All concurring.

Smith v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.

636 A.2d 438 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 19, 1994

We review a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Board only for support by competent evidence. Dorey v. Forster Mfg. Co., 591 A.2d 240, 241-42 (Me.1991). The decree may be vacated if it is “without rational basis.” Id. … See also Grant v. Dolan Transp., 609 A.2d 725, 726 (Me.1992) (section 71 determination reviewed for support by competent evidence).

Proctor v. Carey

142 Me. 226 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 19, 1946

Bemis v. Bradley, 126 Me., 462, 139 A., 593 . He also ruled on the authority of Brown v. Gay, 3 Me., 126, and Thomas v. … Brown v. Gay, supra; Thomas v. Patten, supra. With these rulings of law we agree.

Hakanson v. Royal Crest Condominium Association

Superior Court of Maine · May 1, 2018

Brown v. Delta Tau Delta, 2015 ME 75, ir,J 9, 14, 118 A.3d 789; Davis v. R. C. & Sons Paving, Inc., 2011 ME 88, 1 11, 26 A.3d 787.; Trnsiani v. Cumberland & Yor/c Distri.bs., Inc., 538 A.2d 258, 261 (Me. 1988). … Brown, 2015 ME 75, ii 14, 118 A.3d 789. In the context of premises liability ca ses, the existence of a duty generally turns on the question of possession. Denman v.

Bicknell v. Trickey

34 Me. 273 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1852

Hemenway v. Wheeler, 14 Pick. 408 . … Averill v. Loucks, 6 Barb. 20 ; Woodworth v. Stafford, 14 Vermont, 447. Nelson, C. J., in Pierce v.

Laughton v. Harden

68 Me. 208 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 27, 1878

Haskell v. Hilton, 30 Maine, 419. Miller v. Whittier, 32 Maine, 203. Moor v. Veazie, Id. 343. Brown v. Johnson, 53 Maine, 246. … Haughton v. Davis, 23 Maine, 28, 34. Brown v. Johnson, ubi, supra. Sears v. Hardy, 120 Mass. 524 . Story Eq. Pl. §§ 26, 153, 236, and notes.

Logan v. City of Biddeford

2006 Me. 102 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 17, 2006

Logan appealed the Planning Board’s decision to the ZBA, and the ZBA affirmed. … V, § 6[A], tables B, C.

State v. Hinds

485 A.2d 231 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1984

State v. Hebert, 480 A.2d 742, 746 (Me.1984); see State v. Brown, 479 A.2d 1317, 1318 (Me.1984). … Brown, 479 A.2d at 1318 ; see State v. Mahaney, 437 A.2d 613, 621 (Me.1981).

City of Portland v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

103 Me. 240 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 6, 1907

It is true that in Paris v. … In Telephone, Co. v.

Parker v. Bath Iron Works Corp.

644 A.2d 1037 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1994

See Davis v. Scott Paper Co., 507 A.2d 581, 583 (Me.1986). … See Bouford v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 514 A.2d 470, 474 (Me.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1065 , 107 S.Ct. 951 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1987); Stockford v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 482 A.2d 843, 845 (Me.1984); Bouford v.

Carter v. City of Augusta

84 Me. 418 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 31, 1892

Linneus v. Sidney, 70 Maine, 114; Smithfield v. Waterville, 64 Maine, 412. *422 The child was five years of age. The doctrine of Lamson v. Newburyport, 14 Allen, 80 , relied upon by defendant does not apply. … So in Knight v.

Kevin J. Hill v. Town of Wells

254 A.3d 1161 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 13, 2021

Toomey v. Town of Frye Island, 2008 ME 44, ¶ 11, 943 A.2d 563. In doing so, we will not “substitute [our] judgment for that of a board.” Id. … “[T]he party bearing the burden of proof before the Board . . . must show on appeal that the evidence compelled the Board to grant him a variance.” Twigg v. Town of Kennebunk, 662 A.2d 914, 916 (Me. 1995). B.