Opinion

INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF PITTSFIELD v. Chandler

  • 457 A.2d 1122
  • 1983 Me. LEXIS 664
Court
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Filed
Apr 4, 1983
Status
Published
On the bench
Godfrey, Nichols, Carter, Violette, Wathen
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 62.4%

dismissing appeal from Superior Court’s remand as interlocutory

How later courts described this case

  • dismissing appeal from Superior Court’s remand as interlocutory

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

In this action the Defendant, Hadley R. Chandler, appeals a judgment of the Superior Court (Somerset County) entered October 20, 1982, which vacated a decision by the Pittsfield Zoning Board of Appeals holding that a mobile home park owned by the Defendant constituted a nonconforming use under the Pittsfield zoning ordinance. The Superior Court remanded the case to the Pittsfield Zoning Board of Appeals, directing a further remand to the Town’s Planning Board for a hearing on the special exception permit application originally filed by the Defendant.

It is well-established that Superior Court judgments which vacate and remand

*1123

for further proceedings are interlocutory in nature and are not final judgments reviewable by this Court.

Harris Baking Company v. Maine Employment Security Commission,

457 A.2d 427, 428 (Me.1983);

Mac-Dougall

v.

MacDougall,

403 A.2d 783, 784 (Me.1979).

Accordingly, the entry is:

Appeal dismissed.

All concurring.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.