Case law

Luchejko v. City of Hoboken

207 N.J. 191 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 27, 2011

See Brown v. Saint Venantius Sch., 111 N.J. 325, 335 , 544 A.2d 842 (1988) (“[W]e acknowledge the well-settled principal that municipal ordinances do not create a tort duty, as a matter of law.”); Lodato v. … State v. Brown, 190 N.J. 144, 157 , 919 A.2d 107 (2007) (quoting Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 443 , 120 S.Ct. 2326, 2336 , 147 L.Ed.2d 405, 419 (2000)); see also Flomerfelt v.

Sylvia Oshiver on Behalf of Albert H. Oshiver and Sherry J. Oshiver, Trustee for Estate of Albert H. Oshiver v. Office of Personnel Management

896 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Feb 14, 1990

“Our precedent clearly establishes the impropriety of seeking a reversal of the board’s decision on the basis of assertions never presented to the presiding official or to the board.” Rockwell v. … We will not consider the new evidence contained in the supplemental papers because that evidence was not presented to the Board. See Yuni v. Merit Sys.

Brown v. Brown

68 Ala. 114 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1880

If the complainant, Clara Brown, have any interest or estate in the lands, their issues or profits, or any right to occupy them, which she has not forfeited, her remedy at law was adequate and complete. … Brown. This judgment to take effect as of July 16th, 1878, when this cause was submitted.

Brown v. MOORE-BROWN

991 A.2d 33 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 2010

Wynes v. Kaiser Permanente Hospitals

936 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, E.D. California · Mar 28, 2013

Defendants rely on Brown v. City of Tucson, 336 F.3d 1181, 1190 (9th Cir.2003), in arguing that a hostile work environment claim is not actionable under the ADA. (ECF No. 71' at 15.) … See Earl v.

Brown v. Little, Brown & Co.

269 Mass. 102 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 30, 1929

No stock was offered to Brown [the plaintiff] because his services to the company did not warrant a reward. … Neither salary increases, accounting changes, or additions to surplus, were made with any thought to defraud Brown or to enrich the defendants.”

Brown v. Brown

117 Cal. App. 205 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1931

Brown and Alta Blanche Brown. The facts relevant to the appeal herein are briefly as follows: Respondents George B. Brown and Alta Blanche Brown recovered a judgment for the sum of. $750 against appellant Arthur P. … In Cramer v.

Matter of Brown v. Brown

127 A.D.3d 969 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 2015

The question of credibility is irrelevant, and should not be considered” (Matter of Stephens v Stephens, 106 AD3d 748, 748 [2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of DeGasero v DeGasero, 95 AD3d 883 [2012]; … Matter of Opray v Fitzharris, 84 AD3d 1092, 1093 [2011]).

City Council of Watervliet v. Town Board of Colonie

3 N.Y.3d 508 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 2004

SEQRA’s primary purpose “is to inject environmental considerations directly into governmental decision making” (Matter of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v Board of Estimate, 72 NY2d 674, 679 [1988]). … Perales, 86 NY2d 361, 367 [1995]; Matter of Astoria Generating Co. v General Counsel of N.Y.

Commonwealth v. Dobrolenski

460 Pa. 630 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1975

Commonwealth v. … In the words of Justice Frankfurter, writing for the United States Supreme Court in Brown v.

Tequila Cuadra S. de RL de CV v. Manufacturera de Botas Cuadra, S.A. de C.V.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · May 8, 2025

Citations to the appeal record are to TTABVUE, the Board’s online docketing system. See, e.g., Turdin v. Trilobite, Ltd., Conc. No. 94002505, 2014 TTAB LEXIS 17, at *6 n.6 (TTAB 2014). … Berger, 787 F.3d at 1377 (“[V]iewing the evidence as a whole, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion.”).

Brown v. Brown

48 Cal. App. 84 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1920

(Avery v. Clark, 87 Cal. 619, 629 , [ 22 Am. St. Rep. 272 , 25 Pac, 919 ]; Paine v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co., 143 Cal. 654, 657 , [ 77 Pac. 659 ].)

Steinhart v. County of Los Angeles

47 Cal. 4th 1298 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 2010

by the local appeals board before resort is made to the courts.” 7 (Sunrise Retirement Villa v. … City and County of San Francisco (1985) 37 Cal.3d 859, 865 [ 210 Cal.Rptr. 226 , 693 P.2d 811 ]; Board of Supervisors v.

MH DAVIS ESTATE OIL CO. v. Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Board

789 A.2d 398 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2001

The Board’s Decision, March 30, 2001, at 16. … In Dellenbaugh v. Pennsylvania Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund, 562 Pa. 558 , 756 A.2d 1172 (2000), Arturo Azurin, M.D. (Dr. Azurin) performed abdominal surgery on Dora M. Dellenbaugh (Dellenbaugh).

Brown v. Brown

18 V.I. 534 · District Court, Virgin Islands · Jul 13, 1981

Parham v. West

13 Vet. App. 59 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Sep 28, 1999

Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119, 123 (1993); see also Zimick v. … Brown, 7 Vet.App. 271, 274 (1994) (noting that RO “must provide ... notification to the appellant of his or her procedural due process and appellate rights” (citing, inter alia, 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.103 , 19.25)); Hauck v.

Brown v. Brown

4 F. Cas. 356 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana · Jul 1, 1873

[Cited in Peck v. Pease, Case No. 10.894. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.!

Brown v. Brown

277 Ala. 217 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 22, 1964

Co. v. Crocker, 95 Ala. 412 , 11 So. 262 . ‘Courts and juries should rather weigh than count the testimony of witnesses.’ Graham v. State, 92 Ala. 55 , 9 So. 530 ; Life Ass’n v. … We have held in Farish v.

City of East St. Louis v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board

213 Ill. App. 3d 1031 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 30, 1991

See City of Freeport v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board (1990), 135 Ill. 2d 499, 507 , 554 N.E.2d 155, 159 . … (County of Menard v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board (1988), 177 Ill. App. 3d 139, 143 , 531 N.E.2d 1080, 1083 .)

Benjamin Brown v. Michelle Brown

Michigan Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 2020

9, 2020 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 350576 Monroe Circuit Court MICHELLE … BROWN, Family Division LC No. 19-040077-DM Defendant-Appellee.