Case law

Baird v. Board, C., South Orange

108 N.J. Eq. 91 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 12, 1931

All the money was taken in and disbursed by employes of the recreation commission — not themselves members of that board or of the board of village trustees. … In activity a corporation is managed by a board of directors; in dissolution by a board of trustees — the former directors.

Darby v. Board or Review

359 N.J. Super. 479 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 2003

Co. v. … Brady v. Board of Review, 152 N.J. 197, 212 , 704 A.2d 547 (1997), quoting Yardville Supply Co. v. Board of Review, 114 N.J. 371, 375 , 554 A.2d 1337 (1989) (quoting cases; part of sentence de-emphasized).

Toll Bros. v. Planning Board

359 N.J. Super. 448 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 17, 2003

Palatine I v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of Montville, 133 N.J. 546, 553 , 628 A.2d 321 (1993); Hilton Acres v. … Palatine I v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of Montville, supra, 133 N.J. at 554 , 628 A.2d 321 .

Duerr v. Board of Fire Commissioners

55 N.J.L. 272 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1893

.: (1) Written charges of the cause of complaint preferred, signed by the person making them, and filed in the office of the board in charge of the fire department, and (2) a public examination into the charges by said board … Devault v. Camden, 19 Vroom 433 ; Ayres v. Newark, 20 Id. 110; Ackerly v. Jersey City, 25 Id. 310.

CHARLES HEADWEAR, INC. v. Board of Review

11 N.J. Super. 321 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 18, 1951

Super. 321 (1951) 78 A.2d 306 CHARLES HEADWEAR, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW AND LOUIS B. CORTEZ, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. CHARLES HEADWEAR, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW AND GEORGE H. … McFeely v. Board of Pension Commissioners of City of Hoboken, 1 N.J. 212, 216 (1948).

Urso & Brown, Inc. v. DIR., DIV. OF TAX.

353 N.J. Super. 248 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 8, 2002

Super. 248 URSO & BROWN, INC., Predecessor to Al Gar/The Display Connection, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF TAXATION, Defendant-Respondent. … The Tax Court, in a published opinion, Urso & Brown, Inc. v.

Burns v. Hoboken Rent Leveling & Stabilization Board

429 N.J. Super. 435 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 6, 2013

See Arena v. … See Biddle v.

Linden v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

15 N.J. Misc. 549 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 3, 1937

Grimm v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, Sussex, 118 N. J. L. 210, and cases therein cited. Nor does it matter that he did not hold the exemption certificate at the time of his appointment. … Grimm v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, Sussex, supra. Third: Was the dismissal for economic reasons? The meager proofs on this point lack persuasion.

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Board of Review

25 N.J. 221 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 24, 1957

See Browning King Co. of N. Y. v. Local 195, 34 N. J. Super. 13, 26 (App. Div. 1955); Textile Workers Union of America v. Paris Fabric Mills, Inc., 22 N. J. Super. 381, 383 (App. … In Ablondi v. Board of Review, supra, and Mortensen v.

Bloomfield v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

74 N.J.L. 261 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1907

In the case of Pangborn v. … Green, 13 Vroom 627 , and Hermann v. Guttenberg, 34 Id. 616. The distinction between these cases and Freeholders v.

Di Miceli v. State Parole Board

15 N.J. 446 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 31, 1954

Di Miceli v. State Parole Board

29 N.J. Super. 80 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Dec 17, 1953

Super. 80 (1953) 101 A.2d 580 ROSARIO DI MICELI, APPELLANT, v. STATE PAROLE BOARD, RESPONDENT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Submitted December 14, 1953. … Zink v. Lear, 28 N.J. Super. 515 ( App. Div. 1953); White v. Parole Board, 17 N.J. Super. 580 ( App. Div. 1952).

Thomas v. Teaneck Board of Education

184 N.J. Super. 443 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 4, 1982

Bishop v. City of San Jose, 1 Cal.3d 56 , 460 P.2d 137 , 81 Cal.Rptr. 465 (Sup.Ct.1969); City of Joplin v. Industrial Comm’n of Missouri, 329 S.W.2d 687 (Mo.Sup.Ct. 1959); Bradley v. … Casey, 415 Ill. 576 , 114 N.E.2d 681 (Sup.Ct. 1953); see, also, City of Monmouth v. Lorenz, 30 Ill.2A 60, 195 N.E.2d 661 (Sup.Ct.1964).

Wawa Food Market v. Planning Board

114 N.J. 299 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1988

Curley v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

66 N.J.L. 401 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 10, 1901

may order the payment of any bill or claim without such approval by a two-thirds vote of all the members of such board.” … Chism v. Schipper, 22 Vroom 1 . No method of approval is prescribed, and the chief engineer’s testimony may fairly be taken as an approval of the amount of the claim, though not of its legality.

Hofbauer v. Board of Police Commissioners

133 N.J.L. 293 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Oct 5, 1945

In June, 1944, prosecutor was called before the Board of Police Commissioners, reprimanded and warned that charges would be preferred against him if he continued his part-time employment. … The argument that the power given the Board of‘ Police Commissioners to formulate rules and regulations is an unconstitutional delegation of legislative duties has no merit. Cf. Alcutt v. Police Commissioners, 66 N. J.

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Buettel

102 N.J.L. 74 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 27, 1925

In the case of Board of Medical Examiners v. … A jury was demanded and accorded under section 149 of the District Court act, following the decision in the case of Lowrie v. State Board of Dentistry, 90 Id. 54. In State v.

Brown v. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center

767 F. Supp. 618 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 15, 1991

Brown’s appeal was heard by a Committee of the Board of Trustees. DA at 301. None of the members of the Committee of the Board of Trustees hearing the appeal were doctors. Id. … Brown points to the Supreme Court’s decision in Patrick v.

East Orange Board of Educ. v. Scc

405 N.J. Super. 132 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 3, 2009

Super. 132 EAST ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY SCHOOLS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION and The New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Defendants-Respondents. No. … Promissory Estoppel The Board also argues that it should prevail under the doctrine of promissory *875 estoppel, relying on Lobiondo v.

Smith v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

146 N.J. Super. 45 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 7, 1977