Case law

Mebane v. Board of Medical Examiners

305 N.C. 586 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 4, 1982

Development Associates v. Board of Adjustment

301 N.C. 719 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 6, 1981

Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners

300 N.C. 562 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1980

Bray v. State Board of Education

21 N.C. App. 225 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 3, 1974

Motley v. State Board of Barber Examiners

228 N.C. 337 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1947

W., 513 ; Lawrence v. Anderson, 75 S. E., 62 ; Adams v. Standard Oil Co., 97 Miss., 879 , 53 So., 692 . … Hinton v. State Treasurer, supra; Brumley v. Baxter, supra. The judgment below, therefore, is Affirmed.

Frink v. North Carolina Board of Transportation

27 N.C. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1975

In the act establishing the State Highway Commission (Now Board of Transportation), the General Assembly has expressly granted to it the power of eminent domain. G.S. 136-18, State Hwy. Comm’n. v. Matthis, 2 N.C. … Morganton v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co., 251 N.C. 531 , 112 S.E. 2d 111 (1960). Thus, the Board of Transportation has the statutory authority to determine the nature and extent of the property required for its purposes.

Keiger v. Winston-Salem Board of Adjustment

278 N.C. 17 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 29, 1971

Raleigh v. Fisher, 232 N.C. 629 , 61 S.E. 2d 897 . The power to zone, conferred upon the “legislative body” of a municipality, is subject to the limitations of the enabling act. Marren v. Gamble, supra; State v. … The application for the special or conditional use permit here involved was filed subsequent to our decision in Jackson v. Board of Adjustment, 275 N.C. 155 , 166 S.E. 2d 78 .

Jordan v. Civil Service Board of Charlotte

137 N.C. App. 575 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 18, 2000

‘to examine all competent evidence (the “whole record”) in order to determine whether the agency decision is supported by “substantial evidence.” ’ ” Act-Up Triangle v. … Whiteco Outdoor Adver. v. Johnston County Bd. of Adjust., 132 N.C. App. 465, 468 , 513 S.E.2d 70, 73 (1999). In the case at bar, Jordan concedes the Board’s findings of fact are correct.

Sampson County Board of Education v. Heath

368 N.C. 239 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 5, 2015

Evers v. Pender County Board of Education

104 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 3, 1991

In Thompson v. … State v. Schultz, 88 N.C. App. 197, 203 , 362 S.E.2d 853, 857 (1987) (citing State v. Brown, 280 N.C. 588 , 187 S.E.2d 85 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 870 , 34 L.Ed.2d 121 (1972)).

Cobb v. Rocky Mount Board of Education

102 N.C. App. 681 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 1991

The petitioner initially appealed to the Superior Court of Edgecombe County following a denial by the Rocky Mount Board of Education of his request to be reinstated as a school employee. … This case is controlled by the recent decision of Stachlowski v.

Dailey v. Board of Dental Examiners

308 N.C. 386 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 3, 1983

Cox v. Real Estate Licensing Board

301 N.C. 87 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 16, 1980

Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen

285 N.C. 374 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 8, 1974

Power Co. v. Board of Adjustment

285 N.C. 235 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1974

Farris v. Burke County Board of Education

355 N.C. 225 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 2002

However, a different statute controls judicial review of a school board’s action. Accordingly, we apply the standards set out in N.C.G.S. § 150B-51. Overton v. … Crump v. Board of Educ., 326 N.C. 603, 613 , 392 S.E.2d 579, 584 (1990).

Lackey v. Hamlet City Board of Education

258 N.C. 460 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 11, 1963

The question for determination is this: Does the defendant Hamlet City Board of Education now own the lot in controversy in fee absolute, or did title thereto revert to the plaintiffs when the aforesaid Board of Education … Cannon v. Baker, 252 N.C. 111 , 113 S.E. 2d 44 ; Griffin v. Springer, 244 N.C. 95 , 92 S.E. 2d 682 ; Dull v. Dull, 232 N.C. 482 , 61 S.E. 2d 255 ; Ellis v. Barnes, 231 N.C. 543 , 57 S.E. 2d 772 ; Willis v.

Board of Drainage Commissioners v. Wilkinson

193 N.C. 830 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 23, 1927

Board of Education v. Comrs., 183 N. C., p. 302; Construction Co. v. Brockenbrough, 187 N. C., p. 77; Storm v. Wrightsville Beach, 189 N. C., at p. 683. We can find no prejudicial or reversible error.

Day v. Asheville Tobacco Board of Trade

242 N.C. 136 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1955

Attention is directed to the case of Cooperative Warehouse, Inc., v. Lumberton Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc., ante, 123. … Hill v. R. R., 143 N.C. 539 , 55 S.E. 854 .

Coomer v. Lee County Board of Education

220 N.C. App. 155 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 17, 2012

Board of Education policy, State rule, or local board policy[.]” … . §§ 115C-2, 150B-2(la) (2011), our appellate courts have consistently applied the standards for judicial review set out in § 150A-51 to appeals from school boards to the courts, e.g., Overton v.