Case law

Smith v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

48 N.J. Eq. 627 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1891

The bill was filed by the board of chosen freeholders of Essex county, the respondent, against appellant and the Newark City National Bank. … For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Mague, Reed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, Whitaker — 9. For affirmance — Depue, Knapp, Smith — 3.

State v. State Board of Assessors

59 N.J.L. 269 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 15, 1896

State ex rel. Gallager v. Board of Public Works & Board of Finance & Taxation

45 N.J.L. 465 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1883

Springfield v. County Commissioners, 10 Pick. 59 . … It was said by this court in Silverthorne v.

Hinfey v. Matawan Regional Board of Education

77 N.J. 514 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 31, 1978

See Patterson v. Boards of Ed., 11 N. J. Misc. 179 (Sup. Ct. 1933) aff’d o.b. 112 N. J. L. 99 (E. & A. 1934); cf. Fraser v. Robin Dee Day Camp, 44 N. J. 480 (1965); see also Brown v. Board of Ed., 347 U. S. 483 , 74 S. … See Patterson v. Board of Ed., supra; cf. Fraser v. Robin Dee Day Camp, supra; see also Brown v. Board of Ed., supra.

State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

71 N.J.L. 159 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 13, 1904

Hermann v. Guttenberg, 34 Vroom 616 ; Hammer v. State, ex rel. Richards. 15 Id. 667 ; Freeholders of Hudson v. Clarke, 36 Id. 271; Riccio v. … See Kraft v. Board of Education, 38 Vroom 512 .

Fitzsimmons v. Board of Education, Carteret

125 N.J.L. 15 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 18, 1940

Magowan v. Baird, 53 N. J. … of the cases headed by Lyon v.

Commons v. Westwood Zoning Board of Adjustment

81 N.J. 597 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 18, 1980

See Gougeon v. … In Chirichello v.

Central Railroad v. State Board of Assessors

74 N.J.L. 1 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 12, 1906

The validity of the original act for the taxation of railroad and canal property was attacked in the .ease of the Central Railroad Co. v. … fail or refuse to comply with the order so given the board shall have power to appoint some other person to make the new assessment under the direction of the board, and the assessment so made and affirmed by the board shall

Kochman v. Keansburg Board of Education

124 N.J. Super. 203 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 31, 1973

Shelton v. Tucker, supra, 364 U. S. at 488 , 81 S. Ct. 247 . See Keyishian v. Board of Regents of U. of St. of N. Y., 385 U. S. 589, 603-604 , 87 S. Ct. 675 , 1 7 L. Ed. 2d 629 (1967); State v. Caez, supra, 81 N. J. … State v. George Brown, 62 N. J. 588 (1973). The term “deviation from normal * * * *212 mental health” as used in N. J. S.

Bloomfield v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

74 N.J.L. 261 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 25, 1907

In the case of Pangborn v. … Green, 13 Vroom 627 , and Hermann v. Guttenberg, 34 Id. 616. The distinction between these cases and Freeholders v.

Trantino v. New Jersey State Parole Board

154 N.J. 19 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 15, 1998

Brady v. Department of Personnel, 149 N.J. 244, 256 , 693 A.2d 466 (1997). Thus, we must first consider whether the Parole Board applied the correct legal standard for determining parole. See Beckworth v. … unless found to be arbitrary, Monks v.

Thomas v. Teaneck Board of Education

184 N.J. Super. 443 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 4, 1982

Bishop v. City of San Jose, 1 Cal.3d 56 , 460 P.2d 137 , 81 Cal.Rptr. 465 (Sup.Ct.1969); City of Joplin v. Industrial Comm’n of Missouri, 329 S.W.2d 687 (Mo.Sup.Ct. 1959); Bradley v. … Casey, 415 Ill. 576 , 114 N.E.2d 681 (Sup.Ct. 1953); see, also, City of Monmouth v. Lorenz, 30 Ill.2A 60, 195 N.E.2d 661 (Sup.Ct.1964).

Andrews v. Ocean Twp. Board of Adjustment

30 N.J. 245 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 30, 1959

The cited statute reads: “The board of adjustment ^ shall have the power to: d. … They argue relief may not be granted in the absence of hardship, some zoning burden peculiar to the property in question and not common to the entire district, citing Lumund v. Board of Adjustment, 4 N.

Wawa Food Market v. Planning Board

114 N.J. 299 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 1, 1988

Creighton v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

70 N.J.L. 350 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 23, 1904

The liability of the board of freeholders in a case like that under consideration is not that of insurers. It arises only where they "wrongfully neglect to repair” the bridge. Gen. Stat., p. 307, § 9. … In order to prove a legal liability resting upon the board, therefore, it was necessary for the plaintiff to show not only that the bridge was out of repair, but, in addition, either that the board of freeholders had knowledge

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Buettel

102 N.J.L. 74 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 27, 1925

In the case of Board of Medical Examiners v. … A jury was demanded and accorded under section 149 of the District Court act, following the decision in the case of Lowrie v. State Board of Dentistry, 90 Id. 54. In State v.

Baird v. Board, C., South Orange

108 N.J. Eq. 91 · New Jersey Court of Chancery · Mar 12, 1931

All the money was taken in and disbursed by employes of the recreation commission — not themselves members of that board or of the board of village trustees. … In activity a corporation is managed by a board of directors; in dissolution by a board of trustees — the former directors.

Darby v. Board or Review

359 N.J. Super. 479 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 22, 2003

Co. v. … Brady v. Board of Review, 152 N.J. 197, 212 , 704 A.2d 547 (1997), quoting Yardville Supply Co. v. Board of Review, 114 N.J. 371, 375 , 554 A.2d 1337 (1989) (quoting cases; part of sentence de-emphasized).

Toll Bros. v. Planning Board

359 N.J. Super. 448 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 17, 2003

Palatine I v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of Montville, 133 N.J. 546, 553 , 628 A.2d 321 (1993); Hilton Acres v. … Palatine I v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of Montville, supra, 133 N.J. at 554 , 628 A.2d 321 .

Duerr v. Board of Fire Commissioners

55 N.J.L. 272 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1893

.: (1) Written charges of the cause of complaint preferred, signed by the person making them, and filed in the office of the board in charge of the fire department, and (2) a public examination into the charges by said board … Devault v. Camden, 19 Vroom 433 ; Ayres v. Newark, 20 Id. 110; Ackerly v. Jersey City, 25 Id. 310.