Case law

Brown v. Ulster County Board of Elections

48 N.Y.2d 614 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1979

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, to the extent of reinstating so much of the judgment of Special Term as directed the Ulster County Board of Elections to provide the enrolled Democratic … Power, 20 NY2d 680 ; Matter of Ramos v Alpert, 41 AD2d 1012 , affd 32 NY2d 903 ).

Brown v. Maryland Unemployment Compensation Board

189 Md. 233 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 13, 1947

One of the appellants, Robert Brown, testified that he didn’t know whether the gate was locked. … From that decision Robert Brown and other employees appeal to this court.

Brown v. Banking Board

579 P.2d 1267 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 23, 1978

See: Brown v. Banking Board, Okl., 512 P.2d 166 (1973). … Brown v. Banking Board, supra. In an effort to end this interminable litigation, we shall enter an appropriate and final order and judgment. Village Bank v.

Brown v. Board of Trustees

41 Cal. App. 100 · California Court of Appeal · May 7, 1919

The action was brought by Helena Brown, the widow of Alexander Brown, and by ten children and grandchildren of the deceased, to recover damages for the death of said Alexander .Brown, alleged to have been caused by the negligence … (Kenna v. Central Pac. R. R. Co., 101 Cal. 29 , [ 35 Pac. 333 ]; Brett v. Frank & Co., 153 Cal. 272 , [ 94 Pac. 1051 ]; Mugford v. Atlantic etc. Co., 7 Cal. App. 678 , [ 95 Pac. 674 ].)

Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

134 Pa. Commw. 31 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1990

Brown (claimant) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed a referee’s termination of claimant’s benefits. *33 The facts of this case are as follows. … Buckley v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Corbo’s AM PM Mini Market), 109 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 64, 530 A.2d 530 (1987). The City relies on Shenango, Inc. v.

Brown v. Genesee County Board of Commissioners

464 Mich. 430 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jul 3, 2001

See Sewell v Southfield Public Schools, 456 Mich 670 ; 576 NW2d 153 (1998); Bush v Oscoda Area Schools, 405 Mich 716 ; 275 NW2d 268 (1979). … Wade v Dep’t of Corrections, 439 Mich 158 ; 483 NW2d 26 (1992).

Brown v. Board of Appeals.

327 Ill. 644 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1927

The board of appeals denied the application for a building permit, and on review by certiorari the circuit court ordered the board to issue the permit. The board and its members have appealed. … In Kilgore v. Gratto, 112 N. E.

Brown v. Suffolk County Board of Elections

93 N.Y.2d 1012 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1999

Brown v. Campbell County Board of Education

915 S.W.2d 407 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1995

For approximately ten years, Brown worked in food service for the defendant employer, Campbell County Board of Education. … Brown’s employer, the Campbell County Board of Education, apparently does not contest the trial court's award of benefits.

Sherlyn Brown v. Milwaukee Board of School Dire

855 F.3d 818 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 4, 2017

Reeves v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc., 759 F.3d 698, 702 (7th Cir. 2014), citing Beck v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents, 75 F.3d 1130, 1135 (7th Cir. 1996). II. … See EEOC v.

Brown v. Board of County Commissioners

58 Kan. 672 · Supreme Court of Kansas · Nov 6, 1897

On that day, in pursuance of previous arrangements, it was by order of the Board of Commissioners continued as a depository for another year; *673 and thereupon it executed a bond, as required by law, for the security of … Wilkinson v. Adam, 1 Ves. & B. 422. A lessor covenanted with his 'tenant ‘ ‘ to pay for all the buildings and improvements that may be made on said lands.”

Brown v. Franchise Tax Board

197 Cal. App. 3d 300 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1987

Background Plaintiff Sandra Brown represents the class of investors who paid the challenged tax. … Plaintiff Brown sought a refund of this tax on her own behalf and on behalf of the class. Companies also sought to be excused from reporting their distributions as taxable income. The Board denied both requests.

Brown v. Board of Education

81 N.M. 460 · New Mexico Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1970

Brown v. Romero, 77 N.M. 547 , 425 P.2d 310 (1967). She subsequently filed a mandamus proceeding in the district court of Rio Arriba County, in accordance with a suggestion in Brown v. … Brown v. Hatley, supra.

Brown v. Handgun Permit Review Board

188 Md. App. 455 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Oct 28, 2009

The Board affirmed the denial of Brown’s permit by a vote of three to zero. … See United States v. Brooks, 330 A.2d 245, 247 (D.C.1974). Consequently, the evidence before the Board supported the conclusion that Brown’s conviction must have been under § 22-3214(b).

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka

139 F. Supp. 468 · District Court, D. Kansas · Oct 28, 1955

A hearing was held, the subject of which was whether the Board of Education had fully complied with the order of the Supreme Court in this cause dated May 31, 1955. 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 . … The Board of Education submitted the plan put in force for the current school year to bring about desegregation. No useful purpose would be accomplished by setting out the plan in detail.

Brown v. Bedford School Board

122 N.H. 627 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Jul 7, 1982

The United States Supreme Court in Board of Regents v. … See Signorino v. Thomson, No. 85-345 (D.N.H. June 13, 1980).

Brown v. Board of Education

84 F.R.D. 383 · District Court, D. Kansas · Nov 29, 1979

BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, T-316. This historic action was commenced on February 28, 1951. … It was the school board’s theory that Brown v.

Brown v. Chicago Board of Education

824 F.3d 713 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 2, 2016

The district court granted summary judgment to the Board on both. Brown appeals. Because Brown’s suspension did not violate his constitutional rights, we affirm. … He suspended Brown for five days based solely on the Section 3-3 charge of use of verbally abusive language. Brown appealed this decision to the Board.

Brown v. Public Employment Relations Board

345 N.W.2d 88 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 15, 1984

See, e.g., Franzen v. Deere & Co., 334 N.W.2d at 732 (discovery rule applicable to claims based on strict liability in tort); Brown v. … R.B. v.

Brown v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

411 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 1975