Case law

Stoll v. Mayor of Baltimore

163 Md. 282 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 6, 1932

We do not think that the *289 facts disclosed by this record are so clearly analogous to the facts in that case as to make it controlling. … sanitary engineer specializing in sanitary engineering pertaining to sewerage work, sewerage disposal, garbage and rubbish collection and disposal, industrial waste material, *291 odors and other kindred departments,” after qualifying

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 106OAG111

Maryland Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 2021

A statutory definition like GP § 1-113 is generally understood as establishing the default meaning of a term. … Laws, ch. 905, rather than a title clearly treating the statute as definitional, such as “an Act defining the terms ‘newspaper’ and ‘newspaper in general circulation.’”

Kleger

District Court, D. Maryland · Jan 8, 2026

Defendant Robinson is Not Entitled to Qualified Immunity or Public Official Immunity. … Defendant Robinson correctly states that qualified immunity protects government officials from civil liability “unless the official’s conduct violated a clearly established constitutional right.” Pearson v.

Alexander v. State

52 Md. App. 171 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 13, 1982

The *176 request was cumulative, we said, because the court had instructed that in order to qualify or excuse the killing, the defendant had to have believed at the time that a person close to him (his mother) was in danger … Section 12A is a criminal counterpart to Art. 43. § 132, which grants civil immunity to certain persons rendering medical aid under emergency conditions and which was also intended to afford protection to one who assists

Allen v. United States Government

District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 30, 2025

A facial challenge asserts “that the allegations pleaded in the complaint are insufficient to establish subject matter jurisdiction.” Id. … Here, Plaintiff’s amendment to add various federal and state agencies that have sovereign immunity, and against whom Plaintiff has failed to state a plausible claim, is “clearly insufficient.”

Henthorn v. Western Maryland Railway Co.

226 Md. 499 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 17, 1961

out (at p. 575) that “as a general rule grievance procedures provided by a collective bargaining agreement should be a bar to suits by individuals against the Employer based upon alleged violation of the agreement,” we clearly … The appellant, of course, contends that there was no qualified privilege as a matter of law. We do not agree. In Beeler v.

Winternitz v. Summit Hills Joint Venture

73 Md. App. 16 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Nov 9, 1987

The evidence viewed in a light favorable to appellant clearly suffices to establish an agreement between the parties to renew the lease on the terms set forth in the document delivered to appellant in mid-January. … Frank, and I asked him point blank—I said ‘They \sic ] people qualify. You have already qualified them. Will you give them a lease?’ ‘As long as Mr.

Resnick v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS OF BALTIMORE CITY

244 Md. 55 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Sep 14, 1966

Resnick, is a duly qualified candidate in the Democratic Primary Election to be held on September 13, 1966 in Baltimore City for the Maryland House of Delegates. … There-is no expert evidence in the record to establish this and we are of the opinion that this is most unlikely as the spaces reserved for the House of Delegates and the Municipal Court are clearly divided by a separating

Oursler v. Tawes

178 Md. 471 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 12, 1940

Maryland proposed an amendment to article 15 of the Declaration of Rights of the Constitution of Maryland, authorizing the General Assembly to impose taxes on incomes, and providing for the submission of said amendment to the qualified … Abstract comparisons in the application of the many and varied provisions of the Act are urged by the appellants as establishing inequities in its practical effect.

Mayor of Baltimore v. Dembo, Inc.

123 Md. App. 527 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Oct 29, 1998

Dembo’s business qualified as a nonconforming use upon enactment of the Ordinance. … The recited purposes of the Ordinance set forth above, as well as the substance of the licensing provisions for adult entertainment businesses, clearly demonstrate that these licensing provisions are not in the nature of

Rite Aid Corp. v. Lake Shore Investors

298 Md. 611 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 7, 1984

The limitation of “special damages” to pecuniary loss in an injurious falsehood action seems to be the only area with respect to damages that is clearly delineated. … Whether other various losses qualify as special damages depends upon the character of the defamation and the evidence adduced in each case.

Raitt v. Johns Hopkins Hospital

22 Md. App. 196 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 19, 1974

Corso, 265 Md. 84, 97 . 1 Thus, it is necessary that parameters be established through which the standard of care or skill may be expressed. We find these parameters clearly established in Maryland. … established.

Bonaparte v. State

63 Md. 465 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 7, 1885

validity of private demands may well be inquirable into by the Orphans’ Court, and its sanction of their amount be given or withheld as seems proper; but the exercise of such a supervision over claims for taxes, which are established … applicable tu *475 foreign, municipal or other corporations, whose credit is not identified with that of the State, which, for certain reasons and objects of a special and local nature, may be. disposed to aid them by granting immunity

In re Council of Unit Owners of the 100 Harborview Drive Condominium

572 B.R. 131 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Jun 9, 2017

It was established in 1993 as a condominium regime and contains 249 units and a health club. Disclosure Statement [P. 190]. 2. … Because the officers and directors are immune from suit in their official capacities, the debtor may be judgment-proof. . Mr.

Doe v. Miles Laboratories, Cutter Laboratories Div.

675 F. Supp. 1466 · District Court, D. Maryland · Dec 14, 1987

In the words of Lord Abinger: I am clearly of opinion that the defendant is entitled to our judgment.... … A plaintiff who cannot show that a product was both defective and unreasonably dan *1475 gerous has failed to establish the basis for the defendant’s liability.

Shreve v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

166 F. Supp. 2d 378 · District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 25, 2001

Plaintiffs claim that this is a “bold'' but clearly improper end. … Azure, 801 F.2d 336, 340-41 (8th Cir.1986), is clearly inapposite.

Marcas, L.L.C. v. Board of County Commissioners

977 F. Supp. 2d 487 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 25, 2013

The record clearly establishes the MDE inspecting St. Andrew’s Landfill as early as 1999 regarding leachate seeps flowing from the landfill to adjacent waters. See ECF No. 107 at 4. … "Preliminary, we note that, even if the doctrine of governmental immunity were to protect Riverdale from the Board’s claims based on negligence and strict liability, the doctrine of governmental immunity would have no application

McLamb v. The City of Mt. Rainier

District Court, D. Maryland · Sep 6, 2024

Qualified Immunity City Defendants generally contend that even if the conduct of Ms. Ferrufino or Mr. … immunity.

Warr v. JMGM Group, LLC

433 Md. 170 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 25, 2013

The Circuit Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss on the issue of public official immunity, which we affirmed. … But there is no blanket duty any more than there is blanket immunity.

Goldberg v. Modern Trashmoval, Inc.

207 F. Supp. 596 · District Court, D. Maryland · Jul 13, 1962

as retail in deciding whether a particular business enterprise was a ‘retail or service establishment,’ and to substitute a more flexible test, under which selling transactions would qualify as retail if they (1) did not … It does not clearly fall within the ordinary concepts of wholesale or retail.