Case law

Harding v. Skolfield

125 Me. 438 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 7, 1926

Waterhouse as a representative of said Board were approved and confirmed by said Board of Trustees acting as a board as aforesaid.” It appears in the case that the alleged settlement was made by Mr. … Keniston v. Rowe, 16 Maine, 38. Wheelwright v. Greer, 10 Allen, 389 . The statute, indeed, authorizes the mother, although a minor,, to make the complaint, and in Low v.

McAdam v. United Parcel Service & Helmsman Management Services, Inc.

763 A.2d 1173 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 9, 2001

In Freeman v. … Clukey v.

Robbins v. Bates Fabrics, Inc.

412 A.2d 374 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 5, 1980

Pottle v. Brown, supra, at 1013 ; Willette v. Statler Tissue Corp., Me., 331 A.2d 365, 367 (1975); Poole v. Statler Tissue Corp., Me., 400 A.2d 1067 (1979). … Pottle v. Brown, supra; Richardson v. Robbins Lumber, Inc., Me., 379 A.2d 380 (1977); Dunkin Donuts of America, Inc. v. Watson, supra. See also Moreau v. Zayre Corporation, Me., 408 A.2d 1289 (1979), n. 4.

Treat v. Lord

42 Me. 552 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

This is found to bo in exact accordance with the law as laid down by the *562 Court in the case of Brown v. Chadbourne, 31 Maine, 9. … By the common law it is clear, that the public have no right to go upon the banks of ancient navigable rivers for the purpose of towing; and it is said by the Court in the case of Brown v.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

731 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 8, 1990

Webber v. … State v. Edward C., 531 A.2d 672, 673 (Me. 1987).

Farnsworth v. Jackson

32 Me. 419 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1851

In the case of Crocker & ux. v. … In the case of Cutts v.

Elizabeth T. Jalbert v. Maine Public Employees Retirement System

2017 ME 69 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 11, 2017

See Rossignol v. Me. Pub. Emps. Ret. … Antler’s Inn & Rest., LLC v. Dep’t of Pub.

Waugh v. Prince

121 Me. 67 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1921

L., Page 807; Brown v. *71 Vinalhaven, 65 Maine, 402. … In Brown v.

State v. Wilcox

387 A.2d 1124 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 11, 1978

Later that night, the dynamite, wrapped with tape in brown paper with a single blasting cap and a safety fuse, was discovered on the inside window ledge in the principal’s office at Caribou High School. … State v. Gagne, Me., 362 A.2d 166, 170-171 (1976). See also State v. Gagne, Me., 343 A.2d 186, 190-192 (1975). We find no abuse of discretion by the presiding justice in denying the motion for a mistrial. State v.

McIntire v. Plaisted

68 Me. 363 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1878

Cushing v. Thompson, 34 Maine, 496. White v. Brown, 2 Cush. 412 . King v. Ins. Co., 7 Cush. 1 . Bill dismissed, with costs. Appleton, C. J., Babbows, Yibgin, Petebs and Libbey, JJ., concurred.

Inhabitants of Newcastle v. County Commissioners

87 Me. 227 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 15, 1895

Goodwin v. Co. Com. 60 Maine, 328; Brown v. Co. Com. 68 Maine, 537. The petition to the county commissioners in the case now under consideration fails to state many of the facts essential to give them jurisdiction. … The court so held in the case last cited, Brown v. Co. Com. 68 Maine, 537.

Mitchell v. City of Rockland

45 Me. 496 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1858

By section 18, vessels arriving “at any port,” having infected persons on board, are required to anchor “below the town of such port,” and no person or thing on board “ shall be suffered to be brought on shore until the selectmen … J., in delivering the opinion of the Court, in Mitchell v.

Dow v. Caribou Chamber of Commerce & Industry

884 A.2d 667 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 3, 2005

Champagne v. Mid-Me. Med. Ctr., 1998 ME 87, ¶ 5 , 711 A.2d 842, 844 ; M.R. Civ. P. 56. … Newspapers, Inc. v. State, 2005 ME 56, ¶ 10 , 871 A.2d 523, 527 . [¶ 9] “The purpose of FOAA is to open public proceedings and require that public actions and records be available to the public.” Tom of Burlington v.

Darby v. Hayford

56 Me. 246 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1868

It is not perceived that the instructions actually given materially differ from those which were approved in Hovey v. Chase, 52 Maine, 304, and Hovey v. Hobson, 55 Maine, 256. … Brown, as bearing upon the transaction of August 18th, 1860.” A refusal to comply with such a request is not a subject of exceptions.

Estabrook v. Town of Bowdoin

568 A.2d 1098 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 16, 1990

Aucella v. Town of Winslow, 564 A.2d 68, 69 (Me. 1989). … Brown to the north, land of Albert Burgoin to the east, and land of Peter Baker to the south, exactly as listed in the lien notice and inventory.

Comeau v. Maine Coastal Services

449 A.2d 362 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 17, 1982

Similarly, in Brown v. … See Blackman v. Harris Baking Co., Me., 407 A.2d 21 (1979); Gilbert v. Maheux, supra; Brown v.

Fogg v. Town of Eddington

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 31, 2002

See Town of Union v. Strong, 681 A.2d 14, 17 (Me. 1996). Here, the plain meaning, see Springborn v. … TOWN OF EDDINGTON Plaintiff’s Attorney Defendant’s Attomey Donald Brown Esq GILBERT & GREIF, P.A.

State v. Bickford

582 A.2d 250 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 2, 1990

In Colorado v. … Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1982), (quoting, Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949)).

City of Bath v. Inhabitants of Harpswell

110 Me. 391 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1913

, and shall, without fee or reward, deliver such body or bodies to said board, or its duly authorized officer or agent, and permit and suffer the said board or its agents, or the physicians and surgeons from time to time … Veazie v. Howland, 53 Maine, 38; Fayette v. Livermore, 62 Maine, 229; Rockport v. Searsmont, 103 Maine, 495.

Goodrich v. Maine Public Employees Retirement System

48 A.3d 212 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 17, 2012

We vacate the judgment of the Superior Court *214 in part and remand for entry of a judgment (1) vacating the decision of the Board, and (2) remanding to the Board with instructions to provide Goodrich with prospective basic … DISCUSSION [¶ 6] We review the Board’s decision directly for errors of law, abuse of discretion, or findings not supported by substantial evidence in the record. FPL Energy Me. Hydro LLC v. Dep’t of Envtl.