Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

3.97s

  • Neu v. Planning Board of Union

    352 N.J. Super. 544 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 2, 2002

    See, e.g., Govito v. West Jersey Health System, 332 N.J.Super. 293, 321 , 753 A.2d 716 (App.Div.2000); Gerber v. Springfield Bd. of Educ., 328 N.J.Super. 24, 40 , 744 A.2d 670 (App.Div.2000). … Plaintiffs point out that in Smith v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Green v. Jersey City Board of Education

    177 N.J. 434 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Aug 11, 2003

    In Lockley v. … In Wilson v.

    Cited 97 timesPublished
  • Bellis v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    67 N.J.L. 528 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 19, 1902

    L., p. 69), and which provides that whenever a charter or municipal election and a general election shall be held on the day fixed for the general election, the clerk of election and each member of the board of election of … L., p. 41); and that, consequently, members of boards of registry and election in cities are entitled to receive from the county collector, for services rendered at a general election, the compensation provided by section

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wyse v. Board of Police Commissioners

    68 N.J.L. 127 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 9, 1902

    Corp. (4th ed.) 372, and note 1; Weil v. Ricord, 9 C. E. Gr. 169. … L. 264; Road Commission v. Harrington, 26 Vroom 327; Atlantic City, &c., v. Consumers' Water Co., 17 Stew. Eq. 427.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Potts v. Board of Adjustment of Princeton

    133 N.J.L. 230 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 14, 1945

    Brandon v. Montclair, 124 N. J. L. 135; affirmed, 125 Id. 367; Dubin v. Wich, 120 Id. 469; Schnell v. Township Committee of Ocean, 120 Id. 194; Phillips Oil Co. v. Municipal Council of Clifton, 120 Id. 13; Cook v. … Since he adduced no evidence to sustain it, it was incumbent upon the board to resolve the issue against him. Brandon v. Montclair, supra; Dubin v. Wick, supra.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Carrick v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    126 N.J.L. 181 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 21, 1941

    Knight v. Freeholders of Ocean, 48 N. J. L. 70. … McDonald v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Hudson, 99 N. J. L. 393.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Home News v. Board of Education

    286 N.J. Super. 380 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jan 17, 1996

    Auth. v. South Jersey Publishing Co., 135 N.J. 53, 63-64 , 637 A.2d 1261 (1994); North Jersey Newspapers Co. v. Passaic County, 127 N.J. 9, 15-16 , 601 A.2d 693 (1992); South Jersey Publishing Co. v. … Newspapers, Inc. v. Township of Mt. Laurel, 275 N.J.Super. 465, 478-79 , 645 A.2d 510 (App.Div.1994), affirmed as modified, 141 N.J. 56 , 660 A.2d 1173 (1995); Asbury Park Press v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Abbamont v. Piscataway Township Board of Education

    138 N.J. 405 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 22, 1994

    Oklahoma City v. … See, e.g., Jackson v.

    Cited 234 timesPublished
  • Weeks v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    68 N.J.L. 622 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 2, 1903

    The liability of the board of freeholders to answer in damages for injuries received by a person in crossing a county bridge is a statutory one, and is limited to such injuries as *623 directly result from tbe neglect of … the board to properly “erect, rebuild or repair” such bridge.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lanning v. Board of Excise Commissioners

    76 N.J.L. 128 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 24, 1908

    Church, the board has no authority under the law to consider the application of Mr. Lanning.” Assuming, but not deciding, that certiorari is a proper remedy in such case (Stout v. Hopping, 2 Harr. 471 ; Ricardo v. … Common Pleas, 9 Vroom 182 ; Benedict v. Howell, 10 Id. 221; East Orange v. Hulsey, 41 Id. 244), we are of the opinion that the resolution under review must be affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Conda

    164 N.J. Super. 386 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 30, 1978

    In re Brown, 50 N.J. 435 (1967). Contempt by a public official indicates a lack of good faith and a failure to act in the bona fide discharge of his duties. See West v. City of Utica, 71 Hun. 540 , 24 N.Y.S. 1075 (Sup. … A similar statute concerning board of education members was at issue in Errington v. Mansfield Tp. Bd. of Ed., 100 N.J. Super. 132 (App. Div. 1968).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brandon v. Board of Commissioners of Montclair

    124 N.J.L. 135 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1940

    Phillips Oil Co. v. Clifton, supra; Dubin v. Wich, supra; Cook v. Board of Adjustment of Trenton, supra; Schnell v. Township of Ocean, 120 N. J. L. 194. … Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. Walsh, supra; Grady v. Katz, supra; Levy v. Board of Standards and Appeals, supra.

    Cited 96 timesPublished
  • TSI East Brunswick, LLC v. Zoning Board

    215 N.J. 26 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jul 23, 2013

    Id. at 4 , 526 A.2d 109 ; see Sica v. … The Zoning Board was entitled to accept the expert opinion offered by New Vornado’s planner and to reject the contrary opinions offered by TSI’s planner. See Kramer v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Delker v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    90 N.J.L. 473 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jun 18, 1917

    See Hansen v. De Vita, 76 N. J. L. 330. … This court, in Trenton v. Shaw, 49 N. J.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Troth v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    60 N.J.L. 190 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1897

    Shumar v. Applegate, 22 Vroom 117 . … State v. Kelsey, 15 Vroom 1 , 32.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Springfield Tp. v. Board of Educ.

    217 N.J. Super. 570 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 12, 1987

    See Anschelewitz v. Belmar, 2 N.J. 178, 183 (1949); City of Jersey City v. Roosevelt Stadium, 210 N.J. Super. 315, 328 (App.Div. 1986); Van Ness v. Borough of Deal, 139 N.J. … See, e.g., Edelstein v. Asbury Park, 51 N.J. Super. 368, 391-392 (App. Div. 1958); Bowen v. Pursel, 109 N.J. Eq. 67 (E. & A. 1931); Freichnecht v. Meyer, 39 N.J. Eq. 551 (E. & A. 1885); Green v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Board of Chosen Freeholders

    50 N.J.L. 82 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1887

    This, it is admitted, is special and local legislation under the case of Closson v. Trenton, 19 Vroom 438 . … The only boards of freeholders, therefore, which can give such notice are the boards named in the first section, which are boards in counties having no road board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of West Paterson v. Board of Education of Little Falls

    92 N.J.L. 284 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 27, 1918

    The matter sought to be reviewed is the ruling or order of the state board of education substantially affirming the decision of the commissioner of education in a dispute between the board of education of West Paterson and … there shall be an indebtedness for which the board of education of the original school district shall be liable, the said indebtedness shall be assumed by and become the obligation of the board of educa *287 tion of the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • E.M. v. Millville Board of Education

    849 F. Supp. 312 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 28, 1994

    See, e.g., Barlow-Gresham Union High School District No. 2 v. Mitchell, 940 F.2d 1280 (9th Cir.1991); Shelley C. v. Venus Indep. … Baumgartner v. Harrisburg Hous.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Masiello v. State Board of Examiners

    25 N.J. 590 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Jan 20, 1958

    Ct. 1935); Schwarzrock v. Board of Education of Bayonne, 90 N. J. L. 370 (Sup. Ct. 1917); Ridgway v. Board of Education of Upper Freehold Tp., 88 N. J. L. 530 (Sup. Ct. 1916). … Laba v. Board of Education of Newark, supra, 23 N. J. at page 382.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.