Case law

Lankamer v. Lalley

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 9, 2024

“Qualified immunity attaches when an official’s conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” White v. … That right is clearly established.”); Snukis, 2022 WL 2305697, at *7 (denying qualified immunity at the motion to dismiss stage because “it was clearly established that Snukis had a Fourth Amendment right to prompt medical

Normand v. Mississippi Department of Corrections

District Court, N.D. Mississippi · Aug 3, 2021

has clearly abrogated it.” … constitutional right, and (2) that the right was clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct.”

Sims v. Metropolitan Dade County

972 F.2d 1230 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Sep 18, 1992

The current doctrine covers the state official’s discretionary actions with the cloak of qualified immunity so long as the official’s actions do not violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have … ’s actions violated clearly established rights.

BRASHER v. NEW JERSEY STATE PARK POLICE

District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 30, 2025

Plaintiff also contends the Officer Defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity because their actions violated his clearly established rights. (Id. at 24–28.) … immunity because no facts demonstrate a violation of clearly established law.

Berg v. N.Y.C. Police Comm'r

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 25, 2018

  we  determine  they  violated a  clearly  established  right.  … Vega, 371 F.3d 110,  8 116  (2d  Cir.  2004)  (stating  that  where  qualified  immunity  is  based  on  9 claimed special need to search parolee’s residence, the issue “is whether, in  10 light of clearly established

The Cloister East, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

District Court, S.D. New York · Sep 28, 2021

”''® However, “[e]ven where the law is clearly established and the scope of an official’s permissible conduct is clearly defined, the qualified immunity defense also protects an official if it was objectively reasonable … “Qualified immunity is no immunity at all if ‘clearly established’ law can simply be defined” at such a high level of generality. /d.

Fenn v. City of Truth or Consequences

District Court, D. New Mexico · Nov 6, 2019

immunity prong, and that Defendants Alirez and Apodaca are entitled to qualified immunity under the second “clearly established” prong. … Plaintiff’s failure to carry his burden of showing the law was clearly established entitles Defendants to qualified immunity. See Cox v.

Canary v. Osborn

211 F.3d 324 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 3, 2000

It is the defendants’ burden to establish the the title of one of its substitute teachers, it voted to not renew existence of absolute legislative immunity. See Kamplain v. … as established by Bogan v.

Ketring v. City of Loveland, Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 6, 2023

right was clearly established at the time of the offense. … Once a defendant raises the qualified immunity defense, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating a violation of a constitutional right and showing that the right was clearly established.

Hernandez v. County of Santa Clara

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 8, 2020

was clearly established at the time of the 11 alleged misconduct.” … 6 risk that [detainee] would imminently attempt suicide”). 7 Plaintiff argues that qualified immunity does not apply in this case because “custodial 8 safety” is a “clearly established right,”

Horn v. Price

255 N.J. Super. 350 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 9, 1992

doctrine of parental immunity. … Moreover, we are satisfied that all issues of law raised are clearly without merit. R. 2:ll-3(e)(l)(E).

Occupy Columbia v. Nikki Haley

738 F.3d 107 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 16, 2013

In addressing Appellants’ qualified immunity arguments, the district court first agreed with Appellants “that it was not clearly established at the time … June 12, 2013) (denying qualified immunity for state officials and holding that “plaintiffs had a clearly established right to utilize the Plaza to engage in overnight protest activity”).

Garcia v. Does 1-40

779 F.3d 84 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 21, 2014

Qualified Immunity “Qualified immunity protects public officials from liability for civil damages when one of two conditions is satisfied: (a) the defendant’s action did not violate clearly established law, or (b) it was … Defendants bear the burden of establishing qualified immunity. Vincent v. Yelich, 718 F.3d 157, 166 (2d Cir.2013).

REDMON v. SHROPSHIRE

District Court, M.D. Georgia · Feb 23, 2022

establishing that Ford’s actions were unconstitutional, he is entitled to qualified immunity. … Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231 (2009) (“The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional

Wallisa v. City of Hesparia

369 F. Supp. 3d 990 · District Court, C.D. California · Mar 20, 2019

"The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person … The qualified immunity analysis involves two distinct steps, determining: (1) whether the facts alleged by a plaintiff make out a violation of a constitutional right; and (2) if so, whether the right was "clearly established

Jones v. Milsteen

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2023

Finally, on the second prong of the qualified immunity analysis, Jones’ right to be free from excessive force was clearly established at the time of the violation, because a robust consensus of persuasive Court of Appeals … doctrine, and its contention that qualified immunity bars the claim is without merit.

Liggins v. Reicks

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 8, 2021

App’x 555, 558 (7th Cir. 2001) to argue that limited discovery is appropriate after the defense of qualified immunity is asserted. … See Crawford-El, 523 U.S. at 598 (stating that before allowing discovery, the district court should determine whether, assuming the truth of the plaintiff’s allegations, the official’s conduct violated clearly established

Coleman, Sidney v. Sperry, Sam

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · Mar 15, 2024

Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 231 (2009) (qualified immunity protects government officials from personal liability provided that “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … Finally, once again, defendant Sperry is not entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff’s malicious prosecution claim, since it was clearly established within this circuit by the time of the events in question, that no

Kennedy v. City of Ridgefield

439 F.3d 1055 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 7, 2006

Southwest Airlines, 124 F.3d 1103, 1107 (9th Cir.1997) ("[W]e have jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity where the appeal focuses on whether the defendants violated a clearly established … I would hold that, taking into account the "specific context of th[is] case," the right was not clearly established at the time Officer Shields acted, and Shields is thus entitled to qualified immunity.

Olmsted v. Douglas County

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 31, 2023

Government officials are not entitled to qualified immunity if their conduct violates “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Rivas-Villegas v. … See Id. at 657 (“Our qualified-immunity cases illustrate the importance of drawing inferences in favor of the nonmovant, even when . . . a court decides only the clearly-established prong of the standard.”); Anderson, 477