Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.58s
528 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Dec 21, 1981
Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1967 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … Ettinger v. Johnson, 518 F.2d 648, 652 (3d Cir. 1975); cf. Brown v. General Services Administration, supra, at 832, 96 S.Ct. at 1967 ; Gissen v. Tackman, 537 F.2d 784 (3d Cir. 1976).
Cited 8 timesPublished43 Colo. App. 535 · Colorado Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1980
Brown, the deceased’s son, who at the time of decedent’s death was living at the same address as the decedent. … See Griffin v. Workman, 73 So.2d 844 (Fla.1954); Graves v. Welborn, 260 N.C. 688 , 133 S.E.2d 761 (1963).
Cited 2 timesPublished96 Ga. 578 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Aug 12, 1895
Brown died intestate, leaving a mortgage upon his land. The widow was entitled to dower, but it seems yielded her right.
Cited 0 timesPublished98 Cal. App. 2d 142 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 1950
In support of her position, appellant cites the case of DeUprey v. … Proc., § 759.) *145 Apropos is the case of Livermore v. Webb, 56 Cal. 489 . That was an action in partition, the complaint therein alleging that plaintiffs and defendants were owners of land as tenants in common.
Cited 1 timesPublished119 Md. App. 289 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 16, 1998
Denise and Joseph Brown divorced on February 7, 1986. Full custody was awarded to Mrs. Brown 1 (Appellant), and Mr. Brown (Appellee) was ordered to pay child support for the couple’s two children. … Smith v. Smith, 631 So.2d 252, 254-55 (Ala.Civ.App.1993); In re Marriage of Brown, 487 N.W.2d 331, 333-34 (Iowa 1992); Rexroad v. Rexroad, 186 W.Va. 696 , 414 S.E.2d 457, 459-460 (1992).
Cited 1 timesPublished136 So. 2d 684 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 17, 1962
Cited 0 timesPublished7 D.C. 221 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1869
Brown, a colored man, died seized of the lot of ground in dispute five or six years ago, leaving a widow, the defendant, but no children. … Ennis, showing that he had full authority from Amelia Brown to make the arrangement for compromise on the terms already stated, and therefore to appear for and answer the complainant’s bill in her name.
Cited 0 timesPublished71 Cal. App. 4th 358 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1999
Brown has forum-shopped his way through three continents. … As the court stated in Plas v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIn re Advisory Opinion to the Governor—Dual Office-Holding
19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 40 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 20, 1994
on a board. … See, e.g., Town of Palm Beach v. City of W. Palm Beach, 55 So.2d 566, 569 (Fla.1951) (officers of a city’s special sanitary district “are neither state nor county officers. They are district officers _”).
Cited 19 timesPublished184 W. Va. 627 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1991
Syllabus point 2, Garska v. McCoy, 167 W.Va. 59 , 278 S.E.2d 357 (1981). We defined the “primary caretaker” in syllabus point 3 of David M. v. … We pointed out, in David M. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished27 N.C. 136 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1844
In Ford v. Whidbee, 1 Dev. & Bat. … In the next session after the decision of Ford v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedRussell v. Harman International Industries, Inc.
773 F.3d 253 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 2014
See Colbert v. Potter, 471 F.3d 158, 168 (D.C. … Compare Trucking Emp’rs, 561 F.2d at 318 (Title VII waivers must be knowing and voluntary), and Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 456 n.10 (D.C.
Cited 15 timesPublished123 So. 2d 778 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1960
He further answered that Fannie Bailey Brown knew of the said marriage of Tobe Brown and'Melindy Nelson before she, i. e., Fannie Bailey Brown, married Tobe Brown. … Johnson v. Hogan, La.App., 171 So. 467 . As to the necessity ,of producing the marriage record, it was stated in Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMartinsen v. Employment Department
227 Or. App. 597 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 2009
Claimant seeks judicial review of a final order of the Employment Appeals Board (board) dismissing his application for review. … Consequently, we affirm the board’s dismissal of claimant’s application for review because it was untimely.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna