Case law

Bell v. Brown

12 N.Y.3d 801 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 2009

People v. Brown

255 A.D.2d 686 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 12, 1998

Murtagh, 36 NY2d 306, 310 ; see, People v Wimberly, 145 AD2d 823, 825 , lv denied 73 NY2d 1024 ; People v Brown, 66 AD2d 223, 226 ). … 575, 578 ; People v Stockwell, 243 AD2d 992 ).

Baron v. Brown

83 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, S.D. New York · Feb 24, 1949

Merchants’ Heat & Light Co. v. James B. Clow & Sons, 204 U.S. 286 , 27 S.Ct. 285 , 51 L.Ed. 488 ; Freeman v. Bee Machine Co., 319 U. S. 448, 453 , 63 S.Ct. 1146 , 87 L.Ed. 1509 ; Haney v. … Stearns v. Lichtenstein, 48 App.Div. 498 , 62 N.Y.S. 949 ; Sayer v. Beirne, 78 App.Div. 491 , 79 N.Y. S. 696; Bilder v. Ellis, 148 App.Div. 647 , 133 N.Y.S. 425 ; Block v. Nussbaum, 163 App.Div. 463 , 148 N.Y.S. 594 .

Stutson & Bank of Utica v. Brown & Brown

7 Cow. 732 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1827

Horan v. Brown

43 A.D.3d 608 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 9, 2007

v Spencer, 36 NY2d 35, 43-51 [1974]; Wheeler v Sears Roebuck & Co., 37 AD3d 710, 711 [2007]; Wallace v Pacelli, 221 AD2d 778 [1995]; Hlavinka v Slovak Sky Bungalow Colony, 203 AD2d 855, 856 [1994]). … Spencer, supra at 48 [citation omitted]; see Hoppe v Hoppe, 281 AD2d 595 [2001]; Cantave v Peterson, 266 AD2d 492, 493 [1999]; Hlavinka v Slovak Sky Bungalow Colony, supra at 856-857).

Mandle v. Brown

5 Misc. 2d 115 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1956

V, § 6). … The case of Matter of Williams v. Morton ( 297 N. Y. 328 ) appears to be definite authority to the contrary.

Gaylord v. Brown

128 A.D. 340 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 23, 1908

Brown & co., who are defendants in this action; that the firm -had become interested in certain gold and - copper, lands in the Republic of Santo Domingo and caused the defendant, the San Domingo Gold and Copper Company to … Gaylord, and that this defendant is ready and willing, upon the receipt of the proper releases, authorizations, assignment or transfer of said shares of stock from the said Brown & Co. and Alice B.

Brown v. Lavine

56 A.D.2d 649 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 28, 1977

People v. Brown

143 A.D.2d 1026 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 31, 1988

Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796 ; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 ; People v Aiken, 45 NY2d 394 ). … We find that the sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83 ). We have considered the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Eiber, J.

Dunn v. Brown

261 A.D.2d 432 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 10, 1999

Since allegations of intentional conduct cannot form the basis of a claim founded in negligence (see, Wertzberger v City of New York, 254 AD2d 352 ; Friedman v Gallinelli, 240 AD2d 699 ; Cummins v Schouten, 160 AD2d 1165 … Brown, intended to assault the plaintiff (see, Rastelli v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 79 NY2d 289, 295 ; Vanacore v Teigue, 243 AD2d 706 ).

Brown v. Colvin

146 F. Supp. 3d 489 · District Court, W.D. New York · Nov 20, 2015

V. … Nielson v.

People v. Brown

187 A.D.2d 872 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 25, 1992

Our holding in People v Marzano ( 147 AD2d 752 ) requires reversal of the second degree assault conviction on these facts. … Stacey, 173 AD2d 960, 961 , lv denied 79 NY2d 832 ; *873 see also, People v Ware, 173 AD2d 903, 903-904 ; People v Laurey, 163 AD2d 742, 743 , lv denied 76 NY2d 941 ).

People v. Brown

262 A.D.2d 419 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 7, 1999

Quiroz, 192 AD2d 730 ; People v Ro *420 sado, 166 AD2d 544 ; see also, People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241 ). … Brewley, 192 AD2d 540 ; People v Martinez, 187 AD2d 992 ; People v Donovan, 141 AD2d 835 ).

Brown v. Evans

39 Misc. 3d 171 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2012

(Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US at 484 ; Mayfield v Evans, 93 AD3d at 107-109 .) … Council of Teachers v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. of Nassau County, 63 NY2d 100, 102-103 [1984]; Matter of Camacho v Kelly, 57 AD3d 297, 299 [1st Dept 2008].)

Clay v. Brown

264 N.Y. 543 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1934

People v. Brown

77 A.D.3d 1190 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 28, 2010

In 2009, this Court reversed defendant’s prior conviction of stalking in the second degree and remitted the matter to County Court for a new trial (People v Brown, 61 AD3d 1007, 1008 [2009]). 1 Upon defendant’s retrial, he … Miller, 6 NY3d 295, 302 [2006]; People v Beauharnois, 64 AD3d 996, 1000 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 834 [2009]; People v Fairley, 63 AD3d 1288, 1289 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 743 [2009]; People v Ogborn, 55 AD3d 1054, 1056

Brown v. State

268 A.D.2d 548 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 31, 2000

School Dist., 91 NY2d 577, 582 ; Maher v Whitehead, 254 AD2d 263 ; Blessinger v Estee Lauder Cos., 246 AD2d 363 ), the pre-amendment provisions must be considered in resolving this issue. … v Behlen, 220 AD2d 720 ; Anderson v Baker, 248 AD2d 572 ).

People v. Brown

11 N.Y.3d 710 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 2008

11 N.Y.3d 710 (2008) PEOPLE v. BROWN. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Decided October 28, 2008 Motion for leave to appeal denied [*] . NOTES [*] Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic or denied.

Penoyer v. Brown

13 Abb. N. Cas. 82 · New York Marine Court · Jun 15, 1882

The distinction between this case and Miller v. Levi ( 44 N. Y. 489 ), although close, is yet obvious, upon examination.

Wormser v. Brown

25 N.Y.S. 553 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1893

In November, 1892, the defendant trustees, upon notice to the plaintiffs, made an application to the said park board to rescind the resolution of said board revoking said permit; and the said board, after having heard both … defendants that no-relief could be granted to the plaintiffs because the windows had been finished, even if this action had been commenced as soon as-their construction had been begun, citing decision in case of Fire Department v.