Case law

Garysburg Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Commissioners

196 N.C. 744 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1929

R. v. Commissioners, 188 N. C., p. 265; Wolfenden v. Commissioners, 152 N. C., p. 83; Commissioners v. Murphy, 107 N. C., p. 36; Wade v. Commissioners, 74 N. C., p. 81.” Lumber Co. v. Smith, 146 N. … C., 199 ; Land Co., v. Smith, 151 N. C., 70 ; Hart v. Commissioners, 192 N. C., 161 ; Whitley v. Washington, 193 N. C., 240 ; Caldwell Co. v. Doughton, 195 N. C., 62 ; Stanley v. Supervisors, 121 U.

Snow v. North Carolina Board of Architecture

273 N.C. 559 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 1, 1968

Young v. Roberts, 252 N.C.. 9, 112 S.E. 2d 758 ; Realty Co. v. Planning Board, 243 N.C. 648 , 92 S.E. 2d 82 ; Baker v. Varser, 239 N.C. 180 , 79 S.E. 2d 757 ; Pue v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 222 N.C. 310 , 22 S.E. 2d 896 . … Thomas v. Board of Elections, 256 N.C. 401 , 124 S.E. 2d 164 ; Young v. Roberts, supra; Hospital v. Wilmington, 235 N.C. 597 , 70 S.E. 2d 833 ; Jarrell v. Snow, 225 N.C. 430 , 35 S.E. 2d 273 ; Harris v.

Board of Com'rs of Roxboro v. Bumpass

233 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1951

Spiers v. Halstead, 71 N.C. 209 ; Windley v. Bradway, 77 N.C. 333 ; Wheeler v. Cobb, 75 N.C. 21 ; Faulk v. Smith, 84 N.C. 501 ; Bacon v. Johnson, 110 N.C. 114 ; Rodriguez v. Rodriguez, 224 N.C. 275 , 29 S.E. 2d 901 . … Spiers v. Halstead, supra; Bacon v. Johnson, supra; Martin v. Martin, 205 N.C. 157 , 170 S.E. 651 .

Board of Education v. . Lumber Co.

158 N.C. 314 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1912

Board (317) of Education v. Makely , 139 N.C. 34 . … Revisal, 4047; Board of Education v. Makely, supra . The prayers of the defendant so far as they were correct were given in substance in the charge.

Covington v. Montgomery County School Board

139 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Apr 7, 1956

Board of Trustees of University of North Carolina, decided the 16th day of September, 1955, 134 F.Supp. 589, 592 , defended by the Attorney General of North Carolina, in connection with the opinion in Brown v. … If it is ultimately determined that they are, such acts cannot be defended on the ground that the State Constitution, or Statutes or orders of the State Board compel it, for the obvious reason that Brown v.

Mitchell v. Guilford County Board of Education

1 N.C. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 12, 1968

Brown v. Board of Education, 269 N.C. 667 , 153 S.E. 2d 335 . The bus driver in this case had stopped his bus behind another bus while it loaded and moved away. … Greene v. Board of Education, 237 N.C. 336 , 75 S.E. 2d 129 . The plaintiff Joseph P. Mitchell was eleven years old. He is presumed to be incapable of contributory negligence. Brown v. Board of Education, supra.

Keiger v. Winston-Salem Board of Adjustment

281 N.C. 715 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 31, 1972

Town of Hillsborough v. Smith, 276 N.C. 48 , 170 S.E. 2d 904 (1969); Stowe v. Burke, 255 N.C. 527 , 122 S.E. 2d 374 (1961). … Heaton v. City of Charlotte, 277 N.C. 506, 513 , 178 S.E. 2d 352, 356 (1970). Accord, Walker v. Elkin, 254 N.C. 85 , 118 S.E. 2d 1 (1960); Kass v.

Parker v. Board of Alcoholic Control

23 N.C. App. 330 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 16, 1974

Board of Alcoholic Control, 279 N.C. 140 , 181 S.E. 2d 448 (1971) ; Keg, Inc. v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 277 N.C. 450 , 177 S.E. 2d 861 (1970) ; Freeman v. … Board of Alcoholic Control, 264 N.C. 320 , 141 S.E. 2d 499 (1965) ; Bergos v. Board of Alcoholic Control, 15 N.C. App. 169 , 189 S.E. 2d 494 (1972).

Board of Education v. . Hood, Comr.

204 N.C. 353 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1933

See, also, Morecock v. Hood, Comr. , 202 N.C. 321 , 162 S.E. 730 . Nor do the facts constitute a preference upon the trust fund theory as interpreted in Parker v. Trust Co. , 202 N.C. 230 , 162 S.E. 564 ; Williams v. … See, also, Flack v. Hood, Comr., ante , 337. Reversed. *Page 355

Sneed v. Greensboro City Board of Education

299 N.C. 609 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 1, 1980

v. … elective courses); Board of Education v.

Marion Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Commissioners

189 N.C. 99 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 1925

Guano Co. v. New Bern, 172 N. C., p. 260; Pickens v. Comrs., 112 N. C., p. 699; Stanly v. Board of Supervisors, 121 U. S., p. 535. … R. v. Comrs., 188 N. C., p. 265; Wolfenden v. Comrs., 152 N. C., p. 83; Comrs. v. Murphy, 107 N. C., p. 36; Wade v. Comrs., 74 N. C., p. 81.

Carter v. Rockingham County Board of Education

158 N.C. App. 687 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 1, 2003

Mauney v. Morris, 316 N.C. 67, 72 , 340 S.E.2d 397, 400 (1986). … Martin v. Hare, 78 N.C. App. 358, 361 , 337 S.E.2d 632, 634 (1985).

Brannock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

260 N.C. 426 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1963

However, the changes in membership did mot break the continuity of the Board. … The findings .are ample to .sustain the action of the Zoning Board of Adjustment in issuing the special use permit under its discretionary powers. The order of Judge Fountain is Affirmed.

Malloy v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

155 N.C. App. 628 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 31, 2002

“Where the Petitioner alleges that a board decision is based on error of law, the reviewing court must examine the record de novo, as though the issue had not yet been determined.” Whiteco Outdoor Adver. v. … In Kilpatrick v.

City of Wilmington v. Board of Education

210 N.C. 197 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 20, 1936

Tillery v. Candler, 118 N. C., 888 ; Bernard v. Shemwell, 139 N. C., 446 ; Maggett v. Roberts, 108 N. C., 174 . By proper amendment new parties may be brought into a pending action. Dobson v. Southern Ry. Co., 129 N. … Goins v. Sargent, 196 N. C., 478 ; C. S., 547.

Barrett v. North Carolina Psychology Board

132 N.C. App. 126 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 19, 1999

The North Carolina Psychology Board (Board) appeals from the Order of the superior court vacating and reversing the Board’s denial of Patrick Barrett’s (Barrett) application for licensure as a psychologist. … Because the Board erred in its construction of section 90-270.13, we agree with the trial court that the Final Decision of the Board must be reversed. See Brooks, Comr. of Labor v.

Smith v. Forsyth County Board of Adjustment

186 N.C. App. 651 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 6, 2007

Heery v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C. App. 612, 613 , 300 S.E.2d 869, 870 (1983) (applying N.C. Gen. Stat. § 160A-388(e), the parallel statute governing city zoning boards). … To establish standing to appeal a zoning decision to the Board, “[a]djoining property owners must present evidence of a reduction in their property values.” County of Lancaster v.

Brokers, Inc. v. Board of Education

293 N.C. 159 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 14, 1977

Lumberton Improvement Co. v. Board of Commissioners

146 N.C. 353 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1907

Lowder v. Lowder

68 N.C. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1984

Doggett v. Welborn, 18 N.C. App. 105 , 196 S.E. 2d 36 , cert. denied, 283 N.C. 665 , 197 S.E. 2d 873 (1973). … The question of whether Brown, Brown and Brown divulged confidential information to the other parties was litigated and decided against Horace by this court in Lowder v. Mills, Inc., 60 N.C.