Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

3.07s

  • Cable One, Inc. v. Oklahoma State Board of Equalization

    403 P.3d 384 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 24, 2017

    Schulte Oil Co., Inc. v. … National Cable & Teleeommu-nications Ass’n v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Excise Board of Creek County v. State Ex Rel. Kissick

    105 Okla. 102 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1924

    This rule has been approved in Muskogee Times-Democrat v. County Commissioners of Muskogee County, 76 Okla. 188 , 184 Pac. 591 ; State ex rel. v. Beatty, 77 Okla. 50 , 186 Pac. 240 ; Watts, Mayor v. … This conclusion is sustained by Board of Education of the City of Guthrie v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mailath v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Board of Bar Examiners

    752 P.2d 803 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 1, 1988

    The Board allowed him to take the February 1987 examination but did not disclose the results. 10 . Cobb v. … Meinhard v. Salmon, supra note 15. 19 . See Konigsberg v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. v. Board of Com'rs of Pontotoc County

    119 Okla. 215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1926

    Schilling v. … Gooch v. Drumright et al., 88 Okla. 244 , 212 Pac. 991 : “Counsel for the plaintiff contends that this question is settled in his favor in the case of State ex rel. Schilling v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Grant County Excise Board v. Grant County Free Fair Ass'n

    157 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 24, 1932

    J., CLARK, V. C. J., and RILEY, J., absent.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of County Com'rs v. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co.

    178 Okla. 13 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1936

    In the case of Board of Commissioners of Garfield County v. … Board of County Com’rs v. Seawell, 3 Okla. 281 , 41 P. 592 ; Butler v. Board of County Com’rs, 57 Okla. 748 , 157 P. 912 ; Western Paint Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Excise Board of Tulsa County v. State Ex Rel.

    168 Okla. 216 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1934

    Board of Education of the City of Tulsa, v. Ralsa F. Morley et al., this date decided, 168 Okla. 259 , 34 P. (2d) 258 . … CULLISON, V. C. ,T., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, BAY-LESS, and WELCH, JJ., concur. RILEY, C. J., absent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. State Board of Medical Examiners v. Naifeh

    598 P.2d 225 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 10, 1979

    This Court is of the opinion that by virtue of 59 O.S.1971 § 513 and our holdings thereunder, Davis v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 181 Okl. 385 , 74 P.2d 610 (1937) and Choate v. … State, 204 Okl. 596 , 232 P.2d 634 (1951), all appeals from a decision of the Oklahoma Board of Medical Examiners lie exclusively to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. LET THE WRIT ISSUE. LAVENDER, C. J., IRWIN, V. C.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People's Nat. Bank v. Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County

    24 Okla. 145 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1909

    In Gibbons v. *150 Mahon, 136 U. S. 557 , 10 Sup. Ct. 1058, 34 L. … Bryant v. Hawley, 7 Cal. App. xiii , 94 Pac. 850‘.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 19, 2020

    See United States v. Brown, 15-cr-93-G (Doc. … On December 9, 2014, Defendant boarded a return flight to Oklahoma City. Id. at 3.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Standish Pipe Line Co. v. Okmulgee County Excise Board

    201 Okla. 207 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1949

    ARNOLD, V. C. J. … of the need by such governing boards, without itemization and notice, casts upon the excise board the mandatory duty of making a levy for such purposes within the constitutional limitation of one (1) mill.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. OKLAHOMA SECONDARY SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASS'N

    207 P.3d 362 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2009

    See Morrison v. … v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of City of Muskogee v. Valeur

    71 Okla. 100 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 8, 1918

    Valeur, who will be referred to as plaintiff, brought suit against the board of education of the city of Muskogee, who will be referred to as defendant, to recover the sum of $75 alleged to be due him as salary from August … It is admitted that plaintiff was employed by the board of education at a salary of $150 per month, and that on July 31st a resolution was adopted that his services be dispensed with on August 15th.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Elliott v. State

    45 Okla. Crim. 5 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1929

    This question was considered by this court in the case of Sledge v. State, 40 Okla. Cr. 421 , 269 Pac. 385 , and Brown v. State, 42 Okla. … FolloAving the cases of Sledge v. State and Brown v. State, supra, we hold that the contention is without merit.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bradford v. Brennan

    15 Okla. 47 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 3, 1904

    Brown and against the defendant, W. L. Bradford. From this judgment the defendant appeals. It appears from the record that no motion for a new trial was filed. … Mutual Life Insurance Co., 7 Okla., 285; Glasser v. Glasser, 13 Okla., 389 .) The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed. All the -Justices concurring.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • School Board of Cons. School Dist. No. 47 v. Monsey

    198 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1946

    Board of Education v. Allen, 195 Okla. 209 , 156 P. 2d 596 . … Dowell v. Board of Education, 185 Okla. 342 , 91 P. 2d 771 . Since Senate Bill No. 5 does not require that the an *45 nexing district give its consent to the annexation, such consent is not required. Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

    69 O.B.A.J. 2049 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 1998

    by the Board (central assessment). 1 ¶ 3 On August 8, 1994, Taxpayer filed a written protest with the Court of Tax Review, denying that it was a public service corporation and protesting Board’s July 20, 1994 valuation of … Davis v. Sandlin, 1964 OK 123 , 392 P.2d 722 . ¶ 5 Citing United Airlines, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Board of County Commissioners

    389 P.2d 476 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 1964

    We have expressly held it was applicable to a county in Board of Commissioners of Harmon County v. Keen, District Judge, 194 Okl. 593 , 153 P.2d 483 ; Hazlett v. … Board of Com’rs of Muskogee County et al., 168 Okl. 290 , 32 P.2d 940 ; Board of Commissioners of Stephens County v. Hancock, Adm’r, 96 Okl. 238 , 221 P. 429 . See also Whiteneck v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Individual Self-Insured Guaranty Fund Board v. Reno

    76 O.B.A.J. 390 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 2004

    Amos v. Spiro Public Schools, 2004 OK 4 , 85 P.3d 813 . … Waste Commections, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Old Reliable Mutual Insurance Co. v. State Insurance Board

    294 P.2d 294 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1956

    The Board denied Company’s application. … The order of the Board is therefore affirmed. JOHNSON, C. J., and HALLEY, BLACKBIRD, JACKSON and HUNT, JJ-, concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.