Case law

Brown v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

4 N.C. App. 169 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 2, 1969

As to the latter rule, see Kinlaw v. R. R., 269 N.C. 110 , 152 S.E. 2d 329 ; Cox v. Gallamore, supra; Henderson v. Powell, 221 N.C. 239 , 19 S.E. 2d 876 ; and Harper v. R. R., 211 N.C. 398 , 190 S.E. 750 . In Hinnant v. … To like effect, see Faircloth v. R. R., supra, and Godwin v. R. R., 220 N.C. 281 , 17 S.E. 2d 137 . In Jeffries v.

Prichard v. Board of Commissioners of Morganton

126 N.C. 908 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1900

White v. Commissioners , 90 N.C. 439 ; Manuel v. Commissioners , 98 N.C. 9 . … Cited: Bell v. Commissioners , 127 N.C. 91 ; McIlhenny v. Wilmington, ibid. , 149; Moody v. State Prison , 128 N.C. 16 ; Peterson v. Wilmington , 130 N.C. 77 ; Jones v. Commissioners, ibid. , 452; Hull v.

Moss ex rel. Moss v. Brown

199 N.C. 189 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1930

White v. Realty Co., 182 N. C., 536 ; Construction Co. v. R. R., 184 N. C., 179 . “In Bank v. Rochamora, 193 N. … McCall v. Lumber Co., 196 N. C., at p. 602. .

Overton v. Goldsboro City Board of Education

304 N.C. 312 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 3, 1981

Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 292 N.C. at 410 , 233 S.E. 2d at 541 . … However, the Court of Appeals indicated in Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education, 31 N.C.

Gaston Board of Realtors, Inc. v. Harrison

311 N.C. 230 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1984

The Board maintains that a contract between the Board and its members is formed by the Code of Ethics and the bylaws of the group. See Bright Belt Warehouse Association v. … The Board is not aided by its contention that jurisdiction exists by virtue of the “contract” between the parties. In Bright Belt Warehouse Association v.

Huff v. Northampton County Board of Education

259 N.C. 75 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1963

In the case of Smith v. Board of Education, 241 N.C. 305 , 84 S.E. 2d 903 , a 14-year-old pupil on a school bus was assaulted by another pupil. … G.S. 143-291 through 143-300.1 * * Fields v.

Board of Education v. Town of Henderson

126 N.C. 689 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 29, 1900

It will be seen that the act of 1899 does not undertake to "abolish" the school board of education. … Cited: Davison v. Land Co., post , 709; Board of Education v. Henderson , 127 N.C. 8 ; Directors v. Asheville , 128 N.C. 251 ; Bearden v. Fullam , 129 N.C. 479 ; School Directors v. Asheville , 137 N.C. 507 ; S. v.

Southern Railway Co. v. Board of Commissioners

148 N.C. 220 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 25, 1908

In Board of Education v. Commissioners, 137 N. … We are not inadvertent to tbe fact tbat this conclusion in this last respect is not in harmony with what was said in Board of Education v. Board of Commissioners, 137 N. C., 310 .

Brown v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad

208 N.C. 50 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1935

Lumber Co. v. Finance Co., 204 N. C., 285 , 168 S. … Timber Co. v. Insurance Co., 192 N. C., 115 , 133 S. E., 424 . See Lunceford v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Association, 190 N. C., 314 , 129 S. E., 805 . The judgment is Affirmed.

Crawford v. Wayne County Board of Education

275 N.C. 354 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 18, 1969

In Brown v. … Huff v. Board of Education, 259 N.C. 75 , 130 S.E. 2d 26 . The claimant in the Huff case was 17 years of age.

Board of Com'rs of Roxboro v. Bumpass

233 N.C. 190 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 2, 1951

Spiers v. Halstead, 71 N.C. 209 ; Windley v. Bradway, 77 N.C. 333 ; Wheeler v. Cobb, 75 N.C. 21 ; Faulk v. Smith, 84 N.C. 501 ; Bacon v. Johnson, 110 N.C. 114 ; Rodriguez v. Rodriguez, 224 N.C. 275 , 29 S.E. 2d 901 . … Spiers v. Halstead, supra; Bacon v. Johnson, supra; Martin v. Martin, 205 N.C. 157 , 170 S.E. 651 .

Lee v. Federal Paper Board Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 14, 2002

Plaintiff, who is fifty-four years old and a high school graduate, began working for Federal Paper Board's predecessor in February 1967.

Silver v. North Carolina Board of Transportation

47 N.C. App. 261 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 1980

Reidsville v. Burton, 269 N.C. 206 , 152 S.E. 2d 147 (1967); Craig v. Price, 210 N.C. 739 , 188 S.E. 321 (1936). … Little v. Rose, 285 N.C. 724 , 208 S.E. 2d 666 (1974).

Person v. Board of State Tax Commissioners

184 N.C. 499 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 20, 1922

C., 426 ; Board of Education v. Board of Comrs., 178 N. … Sec. 8, par. 6.’ ” In the later case of Brown v. Jackson, 179 N.

Clary v. Alexander County Board of Education

286 N.C. 525 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 12, 1975

Fields v. Board of Education, 251 N.C. 699 , 111 S.E. 2d 910 (1960). Hence, Rule 8(b) and 8(d) required defendant to file a responsive pleading. … Kelly v. Harvester, 278 N.C. 153 , 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971).

Ins. Co. v. . Board of Education

194 N.C. 430 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 2, 1927

C., 672 ; Trust Co. v. Construction Co., 191 N. C., 664 ; Hall v. Jones, 151 N. C., 419 ; Anniston Nat. Bank v. School Committee, 118 N. C., 383 ; Brem v. Covington, 104 N. … Bank v. Clark, 192 N. C., 403 .

North Carolina Board of Architecture v. Lee

264 N.C. 602 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 18, 1965

This assignment of error is overruled on two grounds: First, because plaintiff failed to insert in the record what the answer of Polier would have been had he been permitted to respond, Board of Education v. … Insurance Co. v.

Liggett Group Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

116 F.R.D. 205 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Nov 10, 1986

See, O’Leary v. Purcell Co., 108 F.R.D. 641, 646 (M.D.N.C.1985); Rockland Industries, Inc. v. Frank Kasmir Associates, 470 F.Supp. 1176, 1181 (N.D.Tex.1979); W.R. Grace & Co. v. … In Duplan Corp. v.

Godfrey v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

73 N.C. App. 299 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 5, 1985

See Godfrey v. Union County Board of Commissioners, 61 N.C. App. 100 , 300 S.E. 2d 273 (1983). … In the case sub judice, the landowner, unlike the landowner in Atkins v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Union County, 53 *302 N.C.

Keiger v. Winston-Salem Board of Adjustment

281 N.C. 715 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 31, 1972

Town of Hillsborough v. Smith, 276 N.C. 48 , 170 S.E. 2d 904 (1969); Stowe v. Burke, 255 N.C. 527 , 122 S.E. 2d 374 (1961). … Heaton v. City of Charlotte, 277 N.C. 506, 513 , 178 S.E. 2d 352, 356 (1970). Accord, Walker v. Elkin, 254 N.C. 85 , 118 S.E. 2d 1 (1960); Kass v.