Case law

Robinson v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners

212 S.W.3d 165 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 2006

Nelson v. Crane, 187 S.W.3d 868, 869 (Mo. banc 2006). We review such questions de novo. Id. … Cook Tractor Co., Inc. v. Director of Revenue, 187 S.W.3d 870, 873 (Mo. banc 2006). Undefined words are given their plain and ordinary meaning as found in the dictionary. Id. (citing Asbury v.

Mitchell v. Wellston Board of Education

567 S.W.2d 143 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 23, 1978

In Young v. … Winthrop Sales Corporation v. Shelton, 389 S.W.2d 70 [4, 6] (Mo.App.1965). It may well be that plaintiff breached the employment contract.

State ex rel. Nance v. Board of Trustees

961 S.W.2d 90 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1998

As we previously noted in Hale v. … Rector v. City of Springfield, 820 S.W.2d 639, 642 (Mo.App.1991). See also Sheehan v. Springfield Seed and Floral, 733 S.W.2d 795, 797 (Mo.App.1987). The Board counters that the worker’s compensation cases cited by Mr.

Sifferman v. BOARD OF REGENTS, SOUTHEAST MISSOURI

250 F. Supp. 2d 1139 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 11, 2003

250 F.Supp.2d 1139 (2003) James SIFFERMAN, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF REGENTS, SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. No. 1:01CV162 CDP. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Southeastern Division. … Ultimately, as in all major decisions, it is action by the Board of Regents which is legally binding.

State ex rel. Johnson v. Personnel Advisory Board

836 S.W.2d 519 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1992

She subsequently filed a letter with respondent Personnel Advisory Board (PAB) indicating her intent to appeal from her termination of employment pursuant to § 36.390, RSMo 1986. … Stoecker v. Dir. of Revenue, 734 S.W.2d 263 (Mo.App.1987). An application for a writ of mandamus invoking the discretion of an appellate court is the available remedy. Appeal dismissed.

Brown v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

130 Mo. App. 205 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1908

This was expressly decided by the Supreme Court in Webster v. … The instructions on the measure of damages were correct and were in the form approved by the Supreme Court in Ragan v. Railroad, 144 Mo. 623 , 46 S. W. 602 .

Campbell v. Missouri Personnel Advisory Board

687 S.W.2d 272 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1985

Overland Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Missouri State Highway Comm’n, 616 S.W.2d 563, 566 (Mo.App.1981). … State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Finch, 514 S.W.2d 608, 616 (Mo.App.1974). An extended opinion would have no value as precedent. Rule 84.16(b). The judgment is affirmed.

Rose v. Board of Zoning Adjustment Platte County

68 S.W.3d 507 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 2001

In City of Independence v. … V; MO. CONST. Art. I, § 26.

Abrams v. St. Louis County Library District Board

364 Mo. 25 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1953

The defendant Sam Brown Company appealed. The St. Louis County Library District Board, a corporation, was made a defendant. This corporation purchased the building involved in the rental contract. … Reade v. Brooks, 174 F. (2d) 624; Hawkinson v. Johnston, 122 F. (2d) 724.”

Brown v. Current River Land & Cattle Co.

100 Mo. App. 75 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1903

Board v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway

36 Mo. App. 151 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1889

Gorman v. Railroad, 26 Mo. 441 . … See the language of the court in Snider v. Railroad, 73 Mo. 469 ; Razor v. Railroad, 73 Mo. 471 ; Patton v. Railroad, 14 Mo. App. 589 ; Hamilton v. Railroad, 87 Mo. 85 . In Duncan v.

State v. Depriest

288 Mo. 459 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 23, 1921

[State v. Fields, 234 Mo. l.c. 625-6; State v. Ruck, 194 Mo. l.c. 440.] In State v. … [State v. Emory, 79 Mo. 461 ; State v. Hopkirk, 84 Mo. l.c. 288.]

State ex rel. Brown v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.

83 Mo. 395 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

of railroads in this state, the several county courts shall ascertain from the returns in the office of the clerk of the county court, the average rate of taxation levied for school purposes by the several local school boards

Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad v. State Board of Equalization

64 Mo. 294 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1876

The duties of the old board under the law are immediately imposed by the constitution upon the new board. In the case of Ketchum vs. The Pac. R. … We must then look both to' the constitution and the law in force at its adoption to ascertain what duties the board had to perform, and as the law of 1875 made the old board assessors, the new board coming in their stead,

Perkins v. Fielding

119 Mo. 149 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 23, 1893

Brown v. Town of Westport ( 116 Mo. 582 ), rendered in division number 2, as is also the proceedings in 1881, which culminated in the *155 organization of the town of Westport as a city of the fourth class. … Chief Justice Butleb, in the celebrated case of State v.

Jimmy D. Cook v. Parkland Health Center, and Dr. Lawrence Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 2023

Brown’s motion to dismiss. … .; see, e.g., Robertson v.

State ex rel. Horskottle v. Board of Health

16 Mo. App. 8 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1884

Clark v. Mayer, etc., 13 Barb. 32 ; The People v. Gas-Light Co., 64 Barb. 55 ; Reg. v. Bradford N. Co., 6 B. & S. 631. … Bamford v. Tumley, 2 B. & S. (Q. B.) 62. Where a brick-yard is a nuisance, it is immaterial that it was used before plaintiffs bought their lands or built their houses (Brady v.

City of St. Louis v. Brooks

107 Mo. 380 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1891

Bruce v. Vogel, 38 Mo. 101 ; Meek v. Hewitt, 48 Mo. 337 ; State v. Newkirk, 49 Mo. 472 ; Gale v. Michie, 47 Mo. 326 ; Slagel v. Murdock, 65 Mo. 522 . … McKee v. Logan, 82 Mo. 524 ; American Wine Co. v. Scholer, 85 Mo. 496.

TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. v. State Board of Pharmacy

238 S.W.3d 140 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 2007

Community Bancshares, Inc. v. Secretary of State, 43 S.W.3d 821, 823 (Mo. banc 2001). IV. Arguments TAP challenges the Board’s determination on two fronts. … Numerous Missouri cases have used the phrase “penalty” to describe licensure discipline imposed by the Board and other administrative bodies. See Tadrus v.

State ex rel. Hathaway v. State Board of Health

103 Mo. 22 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1890

State Medical Examining Board, 32 Minn. 324 ; People v. Dental Examiners, 110 Ill. 180 . See also Allbutt v. General Council of Medical Education and Registration, 23 Law Rep. 400 , Queen’s Bench Liv. … Illinois State Board of Dental Examiners v. People, 13 N. E. Rep. 201.