Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters2015

10,000+ results

1.88s

  • Brown v. Brown

    175 Mich. 444 · Michigan Supreme Court · May 28, 1913

    The complainant states in her bill that she is the widow of Walter Brown, and that she has been appointed administratrix of his estate, and charges that in the year 1906 the deceased, Walter Brown, with his father, Levi Brown

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    249 Or. 274 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1968

    In Rodda v. … Harrison v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Carl Kelley Construction LLC v. Danco Technologies

    656 F. Supp. 2d 1323 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Aug 7, 2009

    BROWNING, District Judge. … See Pedroza v. Lomas Auto Mall, Inc., 625 F.Supp.2d 1156, 1161-62 (D.N.M.2009) (Browning, J.). In Kreischer v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    15 Mass. 389 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1819

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    633 So. 2d 577 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 30, 1994

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    17 La. App. 35 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 1931

    Arthur Brown, 'the plaintiff, was employed by Newton Brown, his father, who is one of the defendants herein, to work as a laborer on a rice farm in Calcasieu parish. The farm belonged to Seaman A. … Defendant Mayo, on .the other hand, swears that he never refused Newton Brown money to pay -the laborers, and he is. positive that Arthur Brown’s name appeared on the pay rolls.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    21 So. 2d 899 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 1945

    Brown and his wife, Christine, instituted this suit against Grady V. Brown, Willie Teal, J.T. Skeins and R.L. … Plaintiffs charge that Grady V. Brown broke the lock on the front door of the house in order to gain admission therein.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    167 Ga. 555 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Dec 15, 1928

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Dennis

    309 Or. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 3, 2021

    Brown, 301 Or 268, 721 P2d 1357 (1986), and other cases, so long as the automobile is mobile and officers have probable cause to search the vehicle, the state does not need to show any particular exigency under the facts … Dennis see State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    269 So. 2d 76 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 17, 1972

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    99 Ga. 312 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Aug 18, 1896

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    270 Ill. App. 639 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 11, 1933

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    23 Ill. App. 90 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 27, 1887

    Appellant called one Alfred Brown, who testified that in a conversation shortly before the bringing of this suit, with the appellee, the latter told him that he had notified appellant to remove the fence and that if he did … that appellant had said he would remove his fence on his own land and would not join fences with him, appellee, and he told Brown if appellant, removed it without giving statutory notice he would sue him, and ' that that

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    2 La. Ann. 834 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Sep 15, 1847

    The defendant, Brown, had previously held the land, and all the parties cited in warranty claim under him.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    629 So. 2d 1054 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 29, 1993

    Brown (husband) appeals the trial court’s order entered upon rehearing and reconsideration of the court’s order which was entered upon the husband’s motion for reduction of alimony and Frances R. … Brown’s (wife) motion for an increase of alimony and expenses. Frances R. Brown *1055 cross-appeals the same order.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    430 S.W.2d 458 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Jun 28, 1968

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    396 So. 2d 922 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 6, 1981

    In re Cynthia Vinnedge Brown, wife of David Brown, applying for writs of review, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Orleans. No. 79-13867, consolidated with No. 80-13892. Denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    17 Ind. 475 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1861

    Brown recovered a judgment against Thomas M. Springsteen and Thomas II Brown, upon a promissory note, for a fraction over $100. … Kirby v. Studebaker, 15 Ind. 45 . But the statute goes no further than to direct the sheriff in his proceedings on executions in his hands. It does not require him, nor the plaintiff, to pursue collateral remedies.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    22 La. Ann. 475 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 15, 1870

    Brown, the plaintiff, from L. C. Ferrell, decreed a simulation, and a demand to have the transfer of said note from L. C. … Brown from L. C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    278 Ky. 251 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · May 5, 1939

    This is a divorce action filed in the Clark circuit court by appellant and plaintiff below, Marietta Brown, against appellee and defendant below, Duard Brown. … for appellee that it was insufficient for that purpose in that it did not allege . that plaintiff was not guilty of like fault charged against her husband as grounds supporting her petition, and he cites the case of Simms v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.