Case law

Brown v. Brown

117 R.I. 967 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jan 6, 1977

Brown v. Brown

175 Mich. 444 · Michigan Supreme Court · May 28, 1913

The complainant states in her bill that she is the widow of Walter Brown, and that she has been appointed administratrix of his estate, and charges that in the year 1906 the deceased, Walter Brown, with his father, Levi Brown

Carl Kelley Construction LLC v. Danco Technologies

656 F. Supp. 2d 1323 · District Court, D. New Mexico · Aug 7, 2009

BROWNING, District Judge. … See Pedroza v. Lomas Auto Mall, Inc., 625 F.Supp.2d 1156, 1161-62 (D.N.M.2009) (Browning, J.). In Kreischer v.

Brown v. Brown

17 Ind. 475 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1861

Brown recovered a judgment against Thomas M. Springsteen and Thomas II Brown, upon a promissory note, for a fraction over $100. … Kirby v. Studebaker, 15 Ind. 45 . But the statute goes no further than to direct the sheriff in his proceedings on executions in his hands. It does not require him, nor the plaintiff, to pursue collateral remedies.

Brown v. Brown

238 Conn. 906 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 18, 1996

Brown v. Brown

223 N.J. Super. 68 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Oct 2, 1987

See Schlemm v. Schlemm, 31 N.J. 557 (1960); Smith v. Smith, 72 N.J. 350, 360 (1977); Lepis v. Lepis, 83 N.J. 139, 148 (1980). … For example, see the Kentucky case of Peterson v. Peterson, 583 S.W.2d 707 (Ky.Ct.App.1979). It is nevertheless interesting that the Supreme Court of Montana in the case of Reilly v.

Brown v. Brown

167 Ga. 555 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Dec 15, 1928

State v. Dennis

309 Or. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 3, 2021

Brown, 301 Or 268, 721 P2d 1357 (1986), and other cases, so long as the automobile is mobile and officers have probable cause to search the vehicle, the state does not need to show any particular exigency under the facts … Dennis see State v.

Brown v. Brown

269 So. 2d 76 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Oct 17, 1972

Brown v. Brown

99 Ga. 312 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Aug 18, 1896

Brown v. Brown

270 Ill. App. 639 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 11, 1933

Brown v. Brown

23 Ill. App. 90 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 27, 1887

Appellant called one Alfred Brown, who testified that in a conversation shortly before the bringing of this suit, with the appellee, the latter told him that he had notified appellant to remove the fence and that if he did … that appellant had said he would remove his fence on his own land and would not join fences with him, appellee, and he told Brown if appellant, removed it without giving statutory notice he would sue him, and ' that that

Brown v. Brown

2 La. Ann. 834 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Sep 15, 1847

The defendant, Brown, had previously held the land, and all the parties cited in warranty claim under him.

Brown v. Brown

629 So. 2d 1054 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 29, 1993

Brown (husband) appeals the trial court’s order entered upon rehearing and reconsideration of the court’s order which was entered upon the husband’s motion for reduction of alimony and Frances R. … Brown’s (wife) motion for an increase of alimony and expenses. Frances R. Brown *1055 cross-appeals the same order.

Brown v. Brown

249 Or. 274 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1968

In Rodda v. … Harrison v.

Brown v. Brown

430 S.W.2d 458 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Jun 28, 1968

Brown v. Brown

396 So. 2d 922 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 6, 1981

In re Cynthia Vinnedge Brown, wife of David Brown, applying for writs of review, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Orleans. No. 79-13867, consolidated with No. 80-13892. Denied.

Brown v. Brown

22 La. Ann. 475 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 15, 1870

Brown, the plaintiff, from L. C. Ferrell, decreed a simulation, and a demand to have the transfer of said note from L. C. … Brown from L. C.

Brown v. Brown

278 Ky. 251 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · May 5, 1939

This is a divorce action filed in the Clark circuit court by appellant and plaintiff below, Marietta Brown, against appellee and defendant below, Duard Brown. … for appellee that it was insufficient for that purpose in that it did not allege . that plaintiff was not guilty of like fault charged against her husband as grounds supporting her petition, and he cites the case of Simms v.

Brown v. Brown

219 Ky. 787 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · May 10, 1927

Nellie Brown brought this action against her husband, Elliott Brown, for divorce and alimony on the .ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. … circuit court in refusing to grant the plaintiff a divorce was correct, for it was shown in the action that she had been granted a divorce by the judgment of the court from her former husband before she was married to Elliott Brown