Case law

Bonham v. Board of Education

3 F. Cas. 850 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri · Jul 1, 1877

Commissioners of Douglas Co. v. Bolles (decided at the October term, 1876, of the supreme court of the United States) 94 U. S. 104 . … Jordan v. Cass Co. [Case No. 7,517].

Fleddermann v. Camden County, Missouri Board of Adjustment

294 S.W.3d 121 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 2009

set out by the Board. … In view of our holding under Point I that Appellant failed to show that he had standing to challenge the decision of the Board, we need not address his second point as the matter is moot. See KRP ex rel. Brown v.

Heinen v. Police Personnel Board of Jefferson City

976 S.W.2d 534 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1998

Kendrick v. Board of Police Commrs. of Kansas City, 945 S.W.2d 649, 651 (Mo.App.1997). … Mueller v. Ruddy, 617 S.W.2d 466, 478 (Mo.App.1981).

National Labor Relations Board v. Swift & Co.

130 F. Supp. 214 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Mar 25, 1955

The Board further argues that this case is controlled by the recent Supreme Court cases of Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union, 346 U.S. 485 , 74 S.Ct. 161 , 98 L.Ed. 228 and Capital Service, Inc., v. … In United Construction Workers v. Laburnum Const.

Office Supply Store.com v. Kansas City School Board

334 S.W.3d 574 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 2011

Browning Enterp., Inc. v. Rex Iron & Mach. Prods. Co., 504 F.Supp.2d 1217, 1224 (N.D.Ala.2007) (citations omitted); see also, e.g., Phillips Exeter Academy v. … See Klocek v.

Rodgers v. University of Missouri Board of Curators

56 F. Supp. 3d 1037 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 29, 2014

See Board of Curators of University of Missouri v. … Dover Elevator Co. v. Arkansas State Univ., 64 F.3d 442 , 446 (8th Cir.1995) (citing Medical Laundry Serv. v. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala., 906 F.2d 571 , 573 (11th Cir.1990)).

State Ex Rel. Hay v. Flynn

235 Mo. App. 1003 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1941

Ellis v. Brown, 326 Mo. 627 , 33 S. W. (2d) 104 .] … Ellis v. Brown, 326 Mo. 627 , 33 S. W. (2d) 124 , which construed provisions of the former registration statute applicable to cities of the size of Kansas City.

Smith v. Missouri State Board of Probation & Parole

743 S.W.2d 123 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 12, 1988

Louis County v. State Tax Commission, 608 S.W.2d 413, 414 (Mo. banc 1980). The element of adversity is essential to the meaning of “contested case” as that term is used in § 536.100. See City of Richmond Heights v. … Ortega v. Ortega, 695 S.W.2d 162, 163 (Mo.App.1985). The appeal is dismissed. All concur.

Madden v. Poplar Bluff R-1 School District

399 S.W.3d 843 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 2013

“D” v. Camden County Comm’n, 800 S.W.2d 452, 456 (Mo.App.1990). It is undisputed that board members Price, Robertson and Brown attended the entire termination hearing. … School Dist. of Kansas City, 606 S.W.2d 189, 196 (Mo.App.1980) (applying this rule to the termination of a tenured teacher rendered pursuant to §§ 168.118-.120); Brown v.

Amalgamated Clothing & Tex. Union v. Brown Group

879 F. Supp. 1015 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 27, 1993

879 F.Supp. 1015 (1993) AMALGAMATED CLOTHING AND TEXTILE WORKERS UNION, SOUTHWEST REGIONAL JOINT BOARD, Plaintiff, v. BROWN GROUP, INC. d/b/a Brown Shoe Company, Defendant. No. 4:92CV01678. … United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 820 F.Supp. 1192 (E.D.Mo.1993, Filippine, J.).

Woodward v. McGaugh

8 Mo. 161 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1843

Process was served on McGaugh and Brown only. … against the note given by McGaugh, Brown, and Davis.

Russo v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole

336 S.W.3d 472 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2011

ORDER PER CURIAM: Following the denial of parole by the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, Benjamin Russo filed a motion for declaratory judgment, or in the alternative, habe-as corpus or mandamus. … The Parole Board filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which was granted. This appeal follows.

Volkman v. City of Kirkwood

624 S.W.2d 58 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1981

Brown v. Beuc, supra at 852. … Brown v. Beuc, supra. Also see Rosedale-Skinker Improvement Ass’n v. Board of Adjustment, supra. We find no merit in this point as raised. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. STEPHAN, P.

Henson ex rel. Lincoln v. Board of Education

948 S.W.2d 202 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1997

The Board of Education of the Washington School District (the District) appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Damian Henson and Laura Lincoln (both referred to as plaintiffs). … Nachtweih v. Maravilla, 861 S.W.2d 164, 167-68 (Mo. App. E.D.1993); see also Lawton v. Jewish Hosp., 679 S.W.2d 370, 374 (Mo.App.

Brown v. Scott-New Madrid-Mississippi Electric Cooperative

728 S.W.2d 303 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1987

Graeff v. Baptist Temple of Springfield, 576 S.W.2d 291 (Mo. banc 1978); Cole v. Plummer, 661 S.W.2d 828 (Mo.App.1983); O’Riley v. Coffelt, 588 S.W.2d 203 (Mo.App.1979). … Kennedy v. Bi-State Development Agency, 668 S.W.2d 260 (Mo.App.1984); Executive Jet Management & Pilot Service, Inc. v. Scott, 629 S.W.2d 598 (Mo.App.1981); Tennis v. General Motors Corp., 625 S.W.2d 218 (Mo.App.1981).

Board of Trustees of Westminster College v. Dimmitt

113 Mo. App. 41 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 16, 1905

Board of Trustees of Westminster College, at Fulton, in the State of Missouri, in amount and manner following,” etc. The evidence shows that the widow of Joseph I. … In Rountree v. Dixon, 105 N.

Gipson v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

609 S.W.2d 468 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1980

Brown v. Beuc, 384 S.W.2d 845 (Mo. … Sheridan v.

Board of Education v. County of St. Louis

347 Mo. 1014 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 18, 1941

McKittrick v. Mo. Utilities Co., 339 Mo. 385 , 96 S. … Consolidated School District of Pike County v. Haid, 328 Mo. 739 , 41 S. W. (2d) 806 . That case is not in point on the facts. The judgment should' be reversed. It is so ordered. All concur.

O'Brien v. State Board of Cosmetology

776 S.W.2d 896 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 14, 1989

Gamble v. Hoffman, 732 S.W.2d 890, 892 [1] (Mo. banc 1987). For purposes of review, the action of the Commission and the order of the Board are treated as one decision. § 621.145. … This court reviews the findings and decision of the Board, not the judgment of the Circuit Court. Hulshof v. Mo. Highway & Transp. Com’n, 737 S.W.2d 726, 727 (Mo. banc 1987).

Carroll v. Board of Police Commissioners

768 S.W.2d 654 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1989

Roberts v. McNary, 636 S.W.2d 332, 335 (Mo. banc 1982). … As observed by this court in Meyer v. St. Louis County, 602 S.W.2d 728 , 734 . (Mo.App.1980), quoting Easy Living Mobile Manor, Inc. v.