Case law

Spurlino Materials, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

805 F.3d 1131 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 13, 2015

Like the Board, we find that the partial-strike precedents are a poor fit for the case before us. See Pacific Coast Supply, LLC v. NLRB, 801 F.3d 321, 333 (D.C. … See Vencare Ancillary Servs., Inc. v.

Boeing Airplane Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

174 F.2d 988 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1949

The Board has found that the no-strike clause of the 1946 contract was not breached. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Sands Manufacturing Co., 306 U.S. 332, 344 , 59 S.Ct. 508 , 83 L.Ed. 682 .

Dover Energy, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

818 F.3d 725 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 22, 2016

Synergy Gas Corp. v. NLRB, 19 F.3d 649, 651 (D.C. Cir. 1994). … Id. at 930–31 (emphases added) (quoting Tasty Baking Co. v. NLRB, 254 F.3d 114, 124 (D.C. Cir. 2001)); accord DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. NLRB, 288 F.3d 434, 444 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Schonberger v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

940 A.2d 159 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2008

“On questions relating to the interpretation of the zoning regulations,” this court must defer to the Board’s reading unless it is “plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulations.” Davidson v. … Davidson v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, supra.

Lester v. Board of Elections for District of Columbia

319 F. Supp. 505 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 1970

Evans v. Cornman, 398 U.S. 419 , 90 S.Ct. 1752 , 26 L.Ed.2d 370 (1970); City of Phoenix, Ariz. v. … Thus this election is not local in the sense the school board election is local. The Court must take notice of the explosion in mass communication undreamed of fifty years ago.

Byrd v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

289 A.2d 877 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1972

Accordingly, the order of the Board is Affirmed. . A serious question, not raised here, is whether the Board had the authority to impose the sanction it did. See Press Liquors, Inc. v. Weakley, 115 U.S.App. … Minkoff v. Payne, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 123 , 210 F.2d 689 (1953) makes clear that the same qualifications required for an original license apply to renewals.

Petrochem Insulation, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

240 F.3d 26 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 26, 2001

The Board rejected this argument, relying on DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Bldg. & Constr. … --the Board relied on Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v.

Deutsche Lufthansa Aktienge-Sellschaft v. Civil Aeronautics Board

479 F.2d 912 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1973

National Airlines, Inc. v. … See, e. g., Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 257 F.2d 229 (1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 881 , 79 S.Ct. 120 , 3 L.Ed.2d 111 (1958); C.A.B. v.

Tenneco Automotive, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

716 F.3d 640 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 2013

Wayneview Care Ctr. v. NLRB, 664 F.3d 341, 348 (D.C. Cir. 2011). We owe “substantial deference” to inferences drawn by the Board from the factual record. Halle Enters., Inc. v. NLRB, 247 F.3d 268, 271 (D.C. Cir. 2001). … McQuaide, Inc. v. NLRB, 133 F.3d 47, 49 (D.C.

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

268 A.2d 801 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 1970

Therefore, the Board found that “[t]he premises qualify as appropriate for a Class ‘C’ license under the provisions of [D.C.Code 1967, § 25-115(a) (Supp. Ill, 1970)].” … After a thorough review of the record, we are unpersuaded that there is not substantial evidence to support the Board’s finding. 2 Affirmed. 1 . See Sophia's Inc. v.

Tradesmen International, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

275 F.3d 1137 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 15, 2002

Associa- tion of Civilian Technicians v. FLRA, 269 F.3d 1112, 1117 (D.C. Cir. 2001); see also, Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. … The Board also relied on the Ninth Circuit's decision in Kaiser Engineers v.

Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Babbitt

87 F.3d 1338 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 2, 1996

WALD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. … Id. at 36 (citing Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , [302] n. 31, 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979)) (emphasis added).

Vann v. District of Columbia Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers

441 A.2d 246 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1982

In JBG Properties, Inc. v. … See Morrison v.

Anderson Enterprises v. National Labor Relations Board

2 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 9, 2001

. § 160 (e) (West 2000); Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … See NLRB v. J.H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co., 396 U.S. 258, 264-65 , 90 S.Ct. 417 , 24 L.Ed.2d 405 (1969); NLRB v. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co., 315 U.S. 685, 698 , 62 S.Ct. 846 , 86 L.Ed. 1120 (1942); Bufco Corp. v.

Hubbard v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

366 A.2d 427 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1976

Board. … The dismal history of zoning action respecting halfway houses in this area of the District of Columbia is recounted in Dupont Circle Citizen’s Association v.

Labor Youth League v. Subversive Activities Control Board

322 F.2d 364 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 1963

Some of these cases are discussed in Mills v. Green 9 and in Walling v. James V. … And also see United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Co., 239 U.S. 466, 476-478 , 36 S.Ct. 212 ,. 60 L.Ed. 387 (1916); Defense Supplies Corp. v.

Town of Springfield v. Surface Transportation Board

412 F.3d 187 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 2005

ICC v. Bhd. of Locomotive Eng’rs, 482 U.S. 270, 280 (1987). … The Board’s refusal to reopen for that reason is therefore not subject to judicial review. See Entravision Holdings, LLC v. FCC, 202 F.3d 311, 313 (D.C. Cir. 2000); see also Schoenbohm v. FCC, 204 F.3d 243, 250 (D.C.

Woodard v. John Howard Pavilion Review Board

258 F. App'x 349 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 21, 2007

Synergy Gas Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

19 F.3d 649 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 25, 1994

See MECO Corp. v. … But see American Thread Co. v.

American Security & Trust Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board

376 A.2d 824 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1977

Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 289 A.2d 885 (1972); Woodridge Nursery School v. Jessup, D.C.App., 269 A.2d 199 (1970). … Green v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 346 A.2d 252, 255 (1975).