Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.06s
174 A.D. 857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1916
Cited 2 timesPublished850 F. Supp. 1185 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 3, 1994
Green, 411 U.S. 792, 798 , 93 S.Ct. 1817, 1822 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); Sheehan v. Purolater Courier Corp., 676 F.2d 877, 881 (2d Cir.1981), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 891 , 109 S.Ct. 226 , 102 L.Ed.2d 216 (1988); Brown v. … Williams v. Smith, 781 F.2d 319 (2d Cir.1986) (citing McKinnon v. Patterson, 568 F.2d 930 (2d Cir.1977), cert, denied 434 U.S. 1087 , 98 S.Ct. 1282 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978)); Brown v.
Abrogated on other grounds by Jackie Lauture v. International Business MacHines Corporation, 216 F.3d 258 (2000)Cited 45 timesPublished51 N.Y.S. 820 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 7, 1898
In Bagley v. Bowe, 105 N. Y. 179 , 11 N. … The doctrine laid down in Tilson v. Terwilliger, supra, was quoted and followed in Wallace v. Nodine (Sup.) 10 N. Y. Supp. 919 , and in Woodworth v. Hodgson (Sup.) 9 N. Y. Supp. 751 .
Cited 2 timesPublished141 A.D.2d 755 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 20, 1988
In any event, while we disapprove of the reference to wavering minds to explain the meaning of reasonable doubt (see, e.g., People v Stevenson, 104 AD2d 835 ), the charge, read as a whole, conveyed the correct standard of … proof to the jury (see, People v Stevenson, supra).
Cited 2 timesPublished38 A.D.3d 657 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 13, 2007
misbehavior report, the positive test results for cannabinoids, and the hearing testimony that the petitioner’s medication did not cause a false positive result, constituted substantial evidence of guilt (see Matter of Rincon v … Selsky, 28 AD3d 565, 566 [2006]; Matter of Burse v Goord, 274 AD2d 678, 679 [2000]; Matter of McBride v Selsky, 257 AD2d 930 [1999]).
Cited 1 timesPublished67 A.D.3d 1428 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 13, 2009
Cited 0 timesPublished67 A.D.3d 819 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 2009
Cited 0 timesPublished83 A.D.3d 1577 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2011
Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal does “not encompass the right to challenge the legality of the sentencing procedure on appeal” (People v Nicholson, 237 AD2d 973, 974 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 908 [1997]), … nor is preservation required to challenge the legality of a sentence (see generally People v Samms, 95 NY2d 52, 56 [2000]).
Cited 1 timesPublished170 Misc. 2d 554 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1996
(See, Matter of Jones v Berman, 37 NY2d 42, 57 .) … Y. v Soto-Lopez, supra, 476 US, at 903, 904 ).
Cited 9 timesPublished208 A.D.2d 431 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 18, 1994
Furthermore, defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is unfounded (see, People v Ellis, 81 NY2d 854 ; People v Thomas, 200 AD2d 413 , lv denied 83 NY2d 915 ). Concur—Sullivan, J.
Cited 1 timesPublished37 Misc. 78 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1902
Grant v. Bank, 97 N. Y. 80 ; Stucky v. Bank, 108 id. 74; Barbour v. Priest, 103 id. 293; Bank v. Cook, 95 id. 343.
Cited 2 timesPublished23 A.D.3d 703 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 2005
Sinistaj, 67 NY2d 236, 237 [1986]; People v Atkins, 309 AD2d 971, 972 [2003], lv denied 3 NY3d 636 [2004]). … People v Aubin, 245 AD2d 805, 806-807 [1997]; People v Edwards, 215 AD2d 498, 498 [1995]; People v Parker, 186 AD2d 593, 594 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 845 [1993]).
Cited 1 timesPublished91 A.D.2d 601 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 6, 1982
On a motion to dismiss under CPLR 4401, the court should not undertake to weigh the evidence, but must take that view of it most favorable to the nonmoving party (Cox v Don’s Welding Serv., 58 AD2d 1013 ; Bartkowiak v St.
Cited 3 timesPublished66 A.D.3d 1500 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 2, 2009
Cited 0 timesPublished68 A.D.3d 1824 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 2009
Cited 0 timesPublished13 N.Y.3d 742 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 2009
13 N.Y.3d 742 (2009) PEOPLE v. BROWN (MAURICE). Court of Appeals of New York. August 7, 2009. Application in criminal case for leave to appeal denied. (Pigott, J.).
Cited 0 timesPublished54 A.D.2d 913 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 1, 1976
Cited 1 timesPublished1 A.D.3d 147 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 13, 2003
exercised its discretion when it inquired whether the jury, after deliberating for six hours, had agreed upon a verdict as to any of the multiple counts submitted, and when it then accepted a partial verdict (see People v … There was nothing coercive or prejudicial about the court’s actions (see Bordas v Walker, 2000 WL 1867915 , 2000 US Dist LEXIS 18324 [SD NY, Dec. 20, 2000]).
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna