Case law

People v. Brown

173 Misc. 2d 542 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1997

He cited People v Jones ( 62 AD2d 356 ) and People v Valderama ( 161 AD2d 820 ) in which the court did not allow the People to introduce, on their direct case, the amount of money found on a defendant who was charged with … The court initially ruled that the money found on one of the defendants could not come in during direct examination by the People based upon case law prevailing in the Second Department (People v Edwards, 199 AD2d 334 ).

Moscowitz v. Brown

850 F. Supp. 1185 · District Court, S.D. New York · May 3, 1994

Green, 411 U.S. 792, 798 , 93 S.Ct. 1817, 1822 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); Sheehan v. Purolater Courier Corp., 676 F.2d 877, 881 (2d Cir.1981), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 891 , 109 S.Ct. 226 , 102 L.Ed.2d 216 (1988); Brown v. … Williams v. Smith, 781 F.2d 319 (2d Cir.1986) (citing McKinnon v. Patterson, 568 F.2d 930 (2d Cir.1977), cert, denied 434 U.S. 1087 , 98 S.Ct. 1282 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978)); Brown v.

People v. Brown

151 A.D.2d 687 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 19, 1989

Motion by the People for resettlement of this court’s decision and order dated February 6, 1989 ( 147 AD2d 489 ), which determined the appeal of Charles Brown from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (West, … J., Brown, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

17 A.D.3d 283 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 28, 2005

The court properly denied defendant’s application made pursuant to Batson v Kentucky ( 476 US 79 [1986]). … The record establishes that defendant consented to submis *285 sion of statutory materials to the deliberating jury pursuant to CPL 310.30 (see People v Brown, 90 NY2d 872, 874 [1997]; People v Spruill, 245 AD2d 534 [1997

Brown v. Buckingham

11 Abb. Pr. 387 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1860

People v. Brown

248 A.D.2d 145 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 5, 1998

the jury specifically, as requested, that defendant’s mere presence at the scene was insufficient to convict her under an acting in concert theory, since the charge as a whole conveyed the proper standards (see, People v

People v. Brown

83 A.D.3d 1577 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2011

Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal does “not encompass the right to challenge the legality of the sentencing procedure on appeal” (People v Nicholson, 237 AD2d 973, 974 [1997], lv denied 90 NY2d 908 [1997]), … nor is preservation required to challenge the legality of a sentence (see generally People v Samms, 95 NY2d 52, 56 [2000]).

Brown v. McBride

24 Misc. 235 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1898

There was no error in this (Prince v. Brooklyn Eagle, 16 Misc. Rep. 186 ; Ullrich v. N. Y. Press Co., 23 Misc. Rep. 168 ; Cady v. Brooklyn Union Co., 23 Misc. Rep. 409 ; Shanks v. Stumpf, 23 Misc. Rep. 264 ). … Evidence in mitigation has to do only with the question of smart money (Millard v. Brown, 35 N. Y. 297 , and cases supra). , . The motion for a new trial on the minutes is denied. Motion denied.

People v. Brown

214 A.D.2d 579 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 3, 1995

Rivera, All AD2d 662; People v Wells, 144 AD2d 400 ; People v Jones, 138 AD2d 405 ). … Marilla, 1 NY2d 319; People v Mower, 144 AD2d 117 ).

Citimortgage, Inc. v. Brown

83 A.D.3d 644 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 5, 2011

vacate a default in appearing or answering must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a potentially meritorious defense to the action (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Development Strategies Co., LLC, Profit Sharing Plan v … Bank N.A. v Slavinski, 78 AD3d 1167 [2010]). Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear or answer.

People v. Brown

194 A.D.2d 682 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 14, 1993

Darby, 75 NY2d 449, 454-455 ; People v Skye, 167 AD2d 892 ; cf., People v Salisbury, 182 AD2d 1105 ). … ; People v Beckum, 156 AD2d 571 ).

Thomas v. Brown

71 A.D.3d 1469 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 19, 2010

People v. Brown

264 A.D.2d 781 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 20, 1999

McCall, 88 NY2d 838 ; People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818 ). … In any event, the defendant’s contention is without merit (see, People v Fardan, 82 NY2d 638 ; People v Watson, 156 AD2d 403 ). *782 The defendant’s claims of prosecutorial misconduct regarding certain questions posed on

People v. Brown

227 A.D.2d 237 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 16, 1996

Sinistaj, 67 NY2d 236, 239 ; People v Sigismundi, 222 AD2d 382, 383 ). … Although the hearing court found this period to be includable, it was, in fact, excludable as time expended for motion practice (see, People v Buong Sai, 223 AD2d 439 -440; People v Bissereth, 194 AD2d 317 , lv denied 82

People v. Brown

215 A.D.2d 772 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 30, 1995

The hearing court, which saw and heard the witnesses, found that the lineup was not suggestive (see, e.g., People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759 ), and we find no reason on this record to disturb its determination.

Brown v. Guichard

37 Misc. 78 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1902

Grant v. Bank, 97 N. Y. 80 ; Stucky v. Bank, 108 id. 74; Barbour v. Priest, 103 id. 293; Bank v. Cook, 95 id. 343.

People v. Brown

125 Misc. 2d 132 · New York County Courts · Jun 25, 1984

California, 342 US 165 ; People v Pobliner, 32 NY2d 356, 365 ). … This finding conforms with Judge Kevin Thomas Duffy’s observation that “the medical records raise a possibility that Brown suffered a second trauma after his arrest.” (United States v Shakur, 560 F Supp 318, 333, n 19 .)

People v. Brown

307 A.D.2d 973 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 11, 2003

The eyewitnesses’ testimony established that the defendant displayed what appeared to be a gun during the course of the crime (see Penal Law § 160.15 [4]; People v Lopez, 73 NY2d 214 [1989]; People v Baskerville, 60 NY2d … Under the circumstances of this case, the defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).

People v. Brown

300 A.D.2d 314 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 2, 2002

of the case’ ” (People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 566 , quoting People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 714 ). … ; People v Lindo, 167 AD2d 558, 559 ).

Brown v. Cody

23 A.D. 210 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1897

“BROWN & FLEMING, “ Per Wm. L. Quinn.” … (Potter v. Thompson, 22 Barb. 87 ; Lyon v. Clark, 8 N. Y. 148, 157 ; Babbett v. Young, 51 Barb. 466 ; Fowler v. Martin, 1 T. & C. 377.)