Case law

Brown v. Brown

5 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 44 · New York Court of Chancery · Oct 7, 1845

Brown v. . Brown

6 N.Y. 106 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1851

Although commenced before, it was tried and decided in the supreme court after the enactment of the code, and to such a case this court has decided that the code applies. ( Grover v. Coon, 1 Comst . 536.)

Brown v. Brown

51 R.I. 132 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Dec 8, 1930

In the meantime on April 3 the respondent filed her motion in the nature of a cross-petition for divorce from bed and board from petitioner. … In support of her contention she cites Wetmore v. Fiske, 15 R.

Brown v. Brown

243 Ga. 423 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Apr 4, 1979

Appellant relies on McNabb v. … Gazaway v. Brackett, 241 Ga. 127 ( 244 SE2d 238 ) (1978); Anderson v. Anderson, 240 Ga. 795 ( 242 SE2d 593 ) (1978). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. Lawson & Brown, Robert W. Lawson, Jr., for appellant.

William R. Young v. Eric K. Shinseki

25 Vet. App. 201 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · May 24, 2012

See Godfrey v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 398, 410 (1995). It is well settled that the Court has jurisdiction to determine whether the Board had jurisdiction to take the action it takes in a decision. See King v. … Brown, 10 Vet.App. 229, 232 (1997) (reviewing Board’s determination that claimant failed to file a Notice of Disagreement, such that the claim was not in appellate status).

Brown v. Brown

15 N.J. Eq. 499 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Mar 15, 1862

The decree of the Chancellor was reversed by the following vote: For reversa l—Judges Brown, Combs, Elmer, Haines, Kennedy, Ogden, Van Dyke, Vredenburgh, Whelpley, Wood—10. For affirmomce —N one.

Brown v. Brown

331 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1992

Brown v. Brown

22 Neb. 703 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1888

The defendant Brown has filed a very lengthy answer, which need not be noticed here. On the trial of the cause the court found “that the plaintiff, Eliza H. … pay the said sum of money in its possession, one-half of the same to-said plaintiff and one-half to said defendant Brown, as-aforesaid, and that the said plaintiff and the said defendant-Brown should pay the costs of suit

United States v. Jovanovic

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

Bolieu v. Our Lady of Compassion Care Center

983 P.2d 1270 · Alaska Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1999

Davis v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Brown

299 Ky. 388 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · Feb 13, 1945

Brown was 47 years of age and had one child 14 or 15 years old. Brown was 66 years of age and had reared several children, all of whom were grown and married in 1934. … Brown’s name. A small house was built on this lot, partly from lumber brought by Brown from his Letcher County farm. Mrs. Brown said she paid for the hauling of the lumber and also $10 on a lumber bill.

Brown v. Brown

544 So. 2d 141 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1989

Brown v. Brown

430 So. 2d 140 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 28, 1983

City of *142 New Orleans v. LeBourgeois, 50 La.Ann. 591 , 23 So. 542 (1898); cf. Bell v. Holdcraft, 196 So. 379 (La.App.1940); Sandfield Oil and Gas Co. v. Paul, 7 So.2d 725 (La.App.1942); Vinson v. … Johnson v. Jones-Journet, supra. In Pryor v.

Brown v. Brown

317 N.C. 332 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 2, 1986

Brown v. Brown

1 How. N.P. 94 · Circuit Court of the 3rd Circuit of Michigan · Feb 6, 1876

Brown, and no one else but him has power to settle,” thus taking the case from the hands of an officer of this court, amenable to this *98 court for Ms acts, and placing it in the hands of a person Over whom this court can

Brown v. Brown

18 Tenn. 84 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1836

The bill charges that the defendant, Elizabeth Brown, got possession of the said will immediately after the death of her father, and that she and her husband, Charles V. … Brown, have suppressed or destroyed it, so that it cannot now be found. The answer of Charles V. Brown denies any knowledge of the existence of a will, or that he had any agency in its destruction.

Brown v. Brown

210 Mich. 595 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1920

Brown, and each heir or assignee was made a party thereto. Neither the administrator nor the estate was made a party. … While these orders are discretionary with the court and are not reviewable, except for abuse of discretion (Smith v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 82 Mich. 93 ; Sanborn v. St.

Brown v. Brown

308 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1983

Brown v. Brown

75 S.C. 25 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Jul 24, 1906

Brown is entitled to. ......$ 280 40 W. F. Brown is entitled to. ......... 280 40 James H. Brown is entitled to>..... 280 40 Louisa A. Brown to................. 140 20 Margaret A. … This exception is overruled. 4 V. “Because said order is contrary to' the terras of the will of John A. Brown, deceased, and the decree of Judge Norton and Judge Townsend.”

Brown v. Brown

4 Pa. D. & C.2d 524 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County · Jun 21, 1955

Brown, filed her complaint in divorce on February 11, 1955, against defendant, John Paul Brown. … In the case of Herman v. Herman, 70 D. & C. 215, the complaint was filed on July 26, 1949, and the sheriff’s return of “Not Found” was made on August 10, 1949.