Case law

School District No. 1 v. Board of Education

73 Mo. 627 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1881

Co. v. County, Court of Morgan Co., 53 Mo. 156 . Judgment affirmed. All concur.

Daniels v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

58 S.W.3d 553 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 2001

Steven GaU Daniels appeals the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole. We affirm. Rule 84.16.(b).

Jackson County Board of Election Commissioners v. Paluka

13 S.W.3d 684 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2000

primary, was disqualified, and whether the election board was obligated to remove his name from the ballot. … Illinois Elections Board v. Socialist Workers Party, 440 U.S. 173, 184-85 , 99 S.Ct. 988 , 59 L.Ed.2d 230 (1979).

Brown v. Kijakazi

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Feb 20, 2025

Swarthout v. Kijakazi, 35 F.4th 608, 611 (8th Cir. 2022) (citing Wildman v. Astrue, 596 F.3d 959, 964 (8th Cir. 2010) and Thomas v. Berryhill, 881 F.3d 672, 675 (8th Cir. 2018)). … Karlix v.

Montague v. Metropolitan Board of Police Commissioners

971 S.W.2d 365 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 21, 1998

Eddie Montague appeals the judgment of the trial court which affirmed the decision of the Metropolitan Board of Police Commissioners finding Montague was unable to faithfully perform the duties for which he was hired, and … Montague alleges the Board erred because: (1) its decision was not supported by competent and substantial evidence; and (2) its decision was arbitrary, unlawful, capricious and unreasonable.

Conder v. Board of Directors of Windsor Sch.

567 S.W.2d 377 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1978

Merideth v. Board of Education of Rockwood R-6 School District, 513 S.W.2d 740, 745 (Mo.App.1974), expresses this limitation: “. . . … Aubuchon v. Gasconade County, R —1 Sch. Dist., 541 S.W.2d 322, 326 (Mo.App.1976). The courts may not usurp the discretionary powers of a school board. Johnson v. Branch, 364 F.2d 177, 181 (4th Cir. 1966).

Johnson v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

964 S.W.2d 253 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1998

Randall Johnson appeals the circuit court’s judgment dismissing his petition for declaratory judgment for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted in which he sought a declaration that the Missouri Board

St. Joseph Board of Public Schools v. Gaylord

86 Mo. 401 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1885

The eleventh section is as follows: “The board of education of any city, town or village elected in pursuance-of this act, as also the board of education, or school directors of any city, town or village already organized … By the act of March 13,1S67 (Acts of 1867, p, 163), this section was made to read as follows : “The board of education elected in pursuance of this act, as well as the board of education or school directors of any city, town

Thornton v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

518 S.W.3d 265 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 2017

During his time on probation, Thornton paid the Board $1,260.00 in intervention fees. Intervention fees are monthly fees paid “toward the costs of [Board] supervision.” Little v. McSwain, 400 S.W.3d 461, 461 (Mo. App. … Anderson v. Crawford, 309 S.W.3d 863, 866 (Mo. App. W.D. 2010) (quoting Armstrong v. Cape Girardeau Physician Assocs., 49 S.W.3d 821, 824 (Mo. App. E.D. 2001)).

Vernor v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

950 S.W.2d 17 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1997

. *18 George Lee Vernor filed a Petition for Declaratory Judgment alleging that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole erred in failing to afford him a preliminary hearing before extending his conditional release date

Newbold v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

34 S.W.3d 403 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 7, 2000

Newbold filed a Petition for Declaratory Judgment, in which he sought to have the trial court issue an injunction requiring the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole to apply the 1968 parole standards in determining his … The trial court granted the Board’s motion to dismiss. This appeal followed.

Sterling Investment Group, LLC v. Board of Managers

402 S.W.3d 95 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 2013

This question is jurisdictional, and our review is guided by Murphy v. Carron. Vahey v. Vahey, 120 S.W.3d 288, 291 (Mo.App.E.D.2003) (citing Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976)). … relies exclusively on Epstein v.

State Ex Rel. Morris B. I. Co. v. Brown

228 Mo. App. 760 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 21, 1934

[McQuoid v. Lamb, 19 Mo. App. 153 .] In Schwoerer v. Christophel, 64 Mo. … J., pp. 886, 887; Carter v. Exposition Co., supra, l. c. 537, 538; Cabanne v. Spaulding, 14 Mo. App. 312, 313, 314 ; Norton V. Griffith, 221 Mo. App. 834, 837 ; Huff v. Shepard, 58 Mo. 242, 245 ; State ex rel. v.

Brown v. Hampton

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Nov 20, 2024

Finally, the Court reminds Brown that a party’s “pro se status . . . do[es] not insulate him from the reach of Rule 11.” Carman v. Treat, 7 F.3d 1379, 1382 (8th Cir. 1993). … Galvan v. Cameron Mut. Ins. Co., 831 F.2d 804, 805 (8th Cir. 1987).

Morris v. St. Louis Board of Education

27 S.W.3d 851 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2000

Dana Casnocha-Jones v. State Board of Nursing

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 2025

As with any other statutory right, an officer can waive his or her right to appear before the board.”); State v. … Relying on Malan Realty Investors, Inc. v.

Dana Casnocha-Jones v. State Board of Nursing

Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 2024

App. 1966); see also, e.g., Brown v. State Bd. of Accountancy, 588 S.W.3d 519, 523 (Mo. App. … Thus, in Gard v. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts, 747 S.W.2d 726 (Mo. App.

Drury Displays, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment

781 S.W.2d 201 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1989

See Kelly v. City of St. Louis Board of Adjustment, 745 S.W.2d 177 (Mo.App.,E.D.1987). The trial court clearly erred as to the second basis for dismissal in light of the recent holding in Drury Displays, Inc. v. … Respondent contends that, since the Board is not a corporation, quasi corporation, or a natural person, it is therefore not a suable entity. In Reifschneider v.

Expanded Metal Co. v. Board of Education

103 F. 287 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Jun 30, 1900

It is, therefore, in my opinion, brought within the doctrine of the case of Smith v. Vulcanite Co., 93 U. S. 486 , 23 L, Ed. 952.

Jamie Snethen v. Missouri State Board of Nursing

Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 2025

Relying on Casnocha-Jones v. State Board of Nursing, 686 S.W.3d 695 (Mo. App. … (quoting Cleveland v. Pol’y Mgmt. Sys.