Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.45s
William McKinney v. Pat Anderson Carol Ployer H.L. Whitley George W. Sumner John Nye
924 F.2d 1500 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 1, 1991
The defendants have raised the affirmative defense of qualified immunity, which shields them from liability for damages if their conduct “does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a … At the time the defendants acted, there was no clearly established liability for exposing prisoners to ETS.
Vacated on other grounds by Helling v. McKinney, 502 U.S. 903 (1991)Cited 107 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · Oct 29, 1998
established under the Fourth or Fourteenth Amendments, the police officers are entitled to qualified immunity. … Like the Aversa court, this court will bypass the issue of qualified immunity because current law forecloses the claim on the merits, making it unnecessary to engage in qualified immunity analysis. 3.
Cited 0 timesPublished556 F. App'x 103 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jan 30, 2014
Officials benefit from qualified immunity unless their conduct violates clearly established law. Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 131 S. Ct. 2074, 2080 (2011). … We must therefore determine whether it was clearly established that if the facts alleged by the plaintiffs are true, the officers’ actions were unconstitutional.
Cited 12 timesUnpublishedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Feb 17, 2026
“Qualified immunity attaches when an official’s conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” White v. … Tucker, 28 F.4th 54, 64 (9th Cir. 2022) (“A government officer is nevertheless entitled to qualified immunity if the plaintiff’s rights were not clearly established at the time of the alleged misconduct.”).
Cited 0 timesUnknown338 F. App'x 587 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 18, 2009
We follow a two-pronged approach when analyzing qualified immunity. … Morris confronted that her conduct was unlawful under clearly established law.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLogan Vanderhoef v. Maurice Dixon
938 F.3d 271 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 21, 2019
Dixon Page 2 verdict, ruling that Dixon was entitled to qualified immunity because no clearly established law put him on notice that doing what he did was unconstitutional. … The rights violated must have been clearly established at the time—the second prong of the qualified-immunity analysis. Bletz, 641 F.3d at 750. “Clearly established No. 18-5993 Vanderhoef v.
Cited 67 timesPublishedClifford George v. Thomas Edholm
752 F.3d 1206 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 28, 2014
The panel further held that the police officers were not entitled to qualified immunity on the Fourth Amendment claim. … Qualified Immunity Even if Officers Freeman and Johnson violated George’s Fourth Amendment rights, they are entitled to qualified immunity if those rights were not “clearly established” at the time of the search.
Cited 41 timesPublished818 F.3d 864 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 5, 2016
Because it was not clearly established at the time, that the perceived domestic violence nature of an investigation was .insufficient to establish reasonable suspicion, however, we hold Dillard is entitled to qualified immunity … He contends it was clearly established that Dillard’s conduct was unconstitutional when the events took place in September 2010, and.Dillard therefore is not entitled to qualified immunity.
Cited 70 timesPublishedSodaro v. City and County of Denver
District Court, D. Colorado · Oct 7, 2024
“Officers named in a § 1983 action may raise a defense of qualified immunity, which shields public officials . . . from damages actions unless their conduct was unreasonable in light of clearly established law.” … Woodward, 912 F.3d 1278, 1299 (10th Cir. 2019) (holding all defendants, including supervisors, were entitled to qualified immunity where Fourth Amendment § 1983 claim failed at clearly established law prong).
Cited 0 timesUnknown88 F.3d 1315 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 15, 1996
The doctrine of qualified immunity would provide Sheriff Brown, in his individual capacity, with a full defense to Cromer's § 1983 charges if Brown's conduct did not "violate clearly established statu- tory or constitutional … If the law supporting the allegedly violated rights was not clearly established, then immunity must lie.
Cited 101 timesPublished338 F. App'x 587 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 18, 2009
We follow a two-pronged approach when analyzing qualified immunity. … Morris confronted that her conduct was unlawful under clearly established law.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 7, 2007
“Whether a right is ‘clearly established’ for purposes of qualified immunity is an BLANKENHORN v. … Saucier’s requirement that the plaintiff’s asserted right be clearly established “does not mean that the very action at issue must have been held unlaw- ful before qualified immunity is shed.” Wall v.
Cited 0 timesPublished940 F.2d 1055 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 15, 1991
In its judgment, the district court said it could not “find the right plaintiffs asserted under the facts of this case to have been clearly established in 1982 to remove defendants’ qualified immunity.” … The district judge’s post-verdict finding of a lack of any clearly established constitutional right under the facts of this case was erroneous, as was his resulting grant of the protection of qualified immunity to the defendants
Cited 62 timesPublishedDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 26, 2025
The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials from liability for civil damages “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … the right was clearly established.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPRATT v. ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER
District Court, D. New Jersey · Sep 18, 2019
established right.” … App’x 142, 144 (3d Cir. 2006) (“Because there is a genuine issue of fact as to whether [defendant] was deliberately indifferent, he has not carried his burden to establish that he is entitled to qualified immunity.”); Carter
Cited 0 timesUnknown582 F.3d 910 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 18, 2009
We nonetheless affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants on the Fourth Amendment claim on the basis of qualified immunity, as the pertinent law was not clearly established at the time of the violations … Qualified Immunity Even if Jensen did violate Paul’s Fourth Amendment rights by seizing him without probable cause, Jensen may still be entitled to qualified immunity if his conduct “ ‘[did] not violate clearly established
Cited 101 timesPublished338 F. Supp. 3d 711 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 6, 2018
Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity protects government officials from liability for civil damages when their conduct does not violate a clearly established statutory or constitutional right. Greer v. … Whether the Rights at Issue Were Clearly Established Although defendants violated plaintiff's Fourth Amendment right, they are entitled to qualified immunity because that right was not clearly established.
Cited 0 timesPublished117 F.3d 1015 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 27, 1997
Public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity from civil damages “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory *1021 or constitutional rights of which a … The court’s comments simply noted an undeniable fact about balancing tests, which is that they produce a wide gray area between the clearly legal and the clearly illegal, and the rules of qualified immunity require giving
Cited 67 timesPublishedMichael Bearden v. Dudley Lemon
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Feb 2, 2007
Further, “[t]his court has . . . taken a broad view of what constitutes ‘clearly established law’ for the purposes of a qualified immunity inquiry . . . . Sexton 210 F.3d at 909 (quoting Boswell v. … “[I]f the law claimed to have been violated was clearly established, the qualified immunity defense ordinarily fails, ‘since a reasonably competent public official should know the law governing his conduct.’”
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 20, 2023
Defendants contend they are entitled to qualified immunity because there is no law that clearly established that a prison cannot limit bulk religious mailings sent directly to an inmate through the prison mailroom … Qualified immunity protects government officials “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna