Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFL

10,000+ results

6.53s

  • Brown v. State

    666 So. 2d 240 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 5, 1996

    Compare Alfonso v. … Next, Brown argues that the trial court erred in requiring him to maintain full-time employment as a special condition of probation. To support his argument, Brown cites Armstrong v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    949 So. 2d 205 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Feb 16, 2007

    949 So.2d 205 (2007) BROWN v. STATE. No. 2D06-404. District Courts of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 16, 2007. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Brown

    366 So. 2d 411 · Supreme Court of Florida · Dec 15, 1978

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Minning

    757 So. 2d 628 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 19, 2000

    757 So.2d 628 (2000) Darwin V. BROWN, Appellant, v. Judith A. MINNING f/k/a Judith A. Brown, Appellee. No. 5D99-2637. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. May 19, 2000. James R. … See Malone v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    418 So. 2d 464 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 25, 1982

    These issues are foreclosed by virtue of the defendant’s plea, Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979), and, therefore, the trial court properly denied relief on these issues. … See LeDuc v. State, 415 So.2d 721 (Fla.1982); Jones v. State, 384 So.2d 736 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded with instructions. LETTS, C. J., and HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    954 So. 2d 32 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 11, 2007

    954 So.2d 32 (2007) BROWN v. STATE. No. 2D06-4823. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. April 11, 2007. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Dugger

    547 So. 2d 1281 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 29, 1989

    See Mills v. State, 507 So.2d 602, 605 (Fla.1987); Bush v. Wainwright, 505 So.2d 409, 411 (Fla.1987); Palmes v. Wainwright, 460 So.2d 362, 365 (Fla.1984).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    946 So. 2d 1249 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 26, 2007

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    388 So. 2d 586 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Aug 20, 1980

    She does not want her appeal dismissed and cites Marshall v. State, 344 So.2d 646 (Fla.2d DCA), cert. denied, 853 So.2d 679 (Fla.1977), as authority for us to allow her appeal to proceed. … The rationale for dismissing an appeal of an escaped prisoner is set out in Woodson v. State, 19 Fla. 549 (1882), as cited in Marshall .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    952 So. 2d 1188 · Supreme Court of Florida · Feb 16, 2007

    952 So.2d 1188 (2007) BROWN v. STATE No. SC06-2496 Supreme Court of Florida February 16, 2007. Decision without published opinion. Rev. denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    434 So. 2d 50 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 12, 1983

    See State v. Barber, 301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974); Estrada v. State, 400 So.2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); V.J.T. v. State, 390 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Daley v. State, 374 So.2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); De La Cova v. … State, 355 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Magueira v. State, 352 So.2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    36 So. 3d 770 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 12, 2010

    Disregarding police orders to stop, the men ran into an apartment which turned out to be Brown’s. … Ill Brown’s argument for affirmance is based on the “knock and announce” statute, § 901.19(1), Fla. Stat. (2007) 2 , as interpreted in Ortiz v. State, 600 So.2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    943 So. 2d 918 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 6, 2006

    BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 1D06-5609. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 6, 2006. Edward L. Brown, pro se, Petitioner.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    943 So. 2d 918 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Dec 6, 2006

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Epstein

    227 So. 2d 245 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 26, 1969

    Brown v. Epstein, Fla.App. 1968, 208 So.2d 836 . … Shavers v. Duval County, Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 684 ; 8 Fla.Jur., Costs, § 33.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    633 So. 2d 1175 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 22, 1994

    This court reversed his conviction in Brown v. State, 427 So.2d 304 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 438 So.2d 834 (Fla.1983). Subsequently, appellant pleaded to a lesser offense of manslaughter with a firearm. … Mills v. Dugger, 559 So.2d 578, 579 (Fla.1990) (citing Suarez v. Dugger, 527 So.2d 190 (Fla.1988); White v. Dugger, 511 So.2d 554 (Fla.1987); Blanco v. Wainwright, 507 So.2d 1377 (Fla.1987)).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    639 So. 2d 1136 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 29, 1994

    State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1069 (Fla.1994). We vacate the sentence and remand for re-sentencing. … See State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla.1990); State v. Betancourt, 552 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1989); Dyer v. State, 534 So.2d 843 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED. COBB, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    946 So. 2d 625 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jan 12, 2007

    BROWNING, C.J., WOLF, and KAHN, JJ., Concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    650 So. 2d 1130 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Mar 1, 1995

    The issues presented are procedurally barred from consideration, as they formed the basis for an earlier motion for postconviction relief. 1 See La Marca v. State, 547 So.2d 350 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Affirmed. . Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Palmer

    233 So. 2d 459 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 2, 1970

    In Webb v. Brown, supra, decided by our Supreme Court in 1912, an action was brought to recover damages for an alleged malicious assault and battery. … The confusion is compounded by the failure of the court, either intentionally or through oversight, to discuss or even mention its prior decision in Webb v. Brown which by dictum appeared to reach a contrary conclusion.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.