Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.43s
277 A.D.2d 857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 1950
Cited 0 timesPublished216 A.D. 725 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1926
Cited 0 timesPublished104 N.Y.S. 1123 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 26, 1907
Cited 0 timesPublished543 S.W.3d 620 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 2018
See Bugg v. Rutter , 466 S.W.3d 596 , 605 (Mo. App. 2015) (attorneys' fees and costs may be awarded under "special circumstances," such as in the case of a party's intentional misconduct); Klinkerfuss v. … Helstein v. Schmidt , 78 S.W.2d 132 , 135 (Mo. App. 1935).
Cited 10 timesPublished51 R.I. 132 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Dec 8, 1930
In the meantime on April 3 the respondent filed her motion in the nature of a cross-petition for divorce from bed and board from petitioner. … In support of her contention she cites Wetmore v. Fiske, 15 R.
Cited 1 timesPublished243 Ga. 423 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Apr 4, 1979
Appellant relies on McNabb v. … Gazaway v. Brackett, 241 Ga. 127 ( 244 SE2d 238 ) (1978); Anderson v. Anderson, 240 Ga. 795 ( 242 SE2d 593 ) (1978). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. Lawson & Brown, Robert W. Lawson, Jr., for appellant.
Cited 1 timesPublished33 Miss. 39 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1857
This was a petition filed in the Probate Court of Marshall *40 county, by ..the appellant, as executor of the last will and testament of John Brown, deceased, alleging the insufficiency of the personal estate of the testator
Cited 0 timesPublished123 Miss. 125 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1920
Brown, filed a suit for divorce in the chancery court and for custody of her child, and was allowed alimony in the sum of sixty dollars per month and attorney’s fees of one hundred and seventy-five dollars.
Cited 0 timesPublished22 Haw. 715 · Hawaii Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1915
In Monroe v. Osborne, 43 N. J. … In Whitney v. Martine, 88 N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025
See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBolieu v. Our Lady of Compassion Care Center
983 P.2d 1270 · Alaska Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1999
Davis v. … Co. v.
Cited 17 timesPublished3 Shan. Cas. 86 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879
This canse of Simeon Cornick and wife v. Mary Brown et al. is referred *87 to in- this bill, and asked to be made exhibits and parts thereof. … See [Beeler v. Dunn], 3 Head, 90 , 91. In Roseborough v.
Cited 0 timesPublished34 Tenn. 431 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1854
. *435 This action in debt for $1167 86 was instituted in the circuit court of Davidson, by Brown & McCullough, against "Win. L. Brown, the defendant below.
Cited 0 timesPublished12 S.D. 21 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1899
defendants kept and retained said wheat, and failed, refused, and neglected to deliver said wheat to plaintiff, or to pay her the market price therefor. ” After the summons had been served in Hutchinson county on the defendant Brown … As the service upon the defendant Brown was confessedly good, appellant’s motion to dismiss the action would not be entertainable in the absence of the following statute, within *23 which, the case clearly comes: ‘ ‘The summons
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna