Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1993

10,000+ results

3.43s

  • Brown v. Brown

    277 A.D.2d 857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 1950

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    47 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 418 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    216 A.D. 725 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    5 Thomp. & Cook 691 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    104 N.Y.S. 1123 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 26, 1907

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    480 So. 2d 527 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1985

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown-Thill v. Brown-Thill

    543 S.W.3d 620 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 2018

    See Bugg v. Rutter , 466 S.W.3d 596 , 605 (Mo. App. 2015) (attorneys' fees and costs may be awarded under "special circumstances," such as in the case of a party's intentional misconduct); Klinkerfuss v. … Helstein v. Schmidt , 78 S.W.2d 132 , 135 (Mo. App. 1935).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    51 R.I. 132 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Dec 8, 1930

    In the meantime on April 3 the respondent filed her motion in the nature of a cross-petition for divorce from bed and board from petitioner. … In support of her contention she cites Wetmore v. Fiske, 15 R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    243 Ga. 423 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Apr 4, 1979

    Appellant relies on McNabb v. … Gazaway v. Brackett, 241 Ga. 127 ( 244 SE2d 238 ) (1978); Anderson v. Anderson, 240 Ga. 795 ( 242 SE2d 593 ) (1978). Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. Lawson & Brown, Robert W. Lawson, Jr., for appellant.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    320 N.C. 511 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 28, 1987

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    33 Miss. 39 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1857

    This was a petition filed in the Probate Court of Marshall *40 county, by ..the appellant, as executor of the last will and testament of John Brown, deceased, alleging the insufficiency of the personal estate of the testator

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    123 Miss. 125 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1920

    Brown, filed a suit for divorce in the chancery court and for custody of her child, and was allowed alimony in the sum of sixty dollars per month and attorney’s fees of one hundred and seventy-five dollars.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    331 N.C. 383 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1992

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    22 Haw. 715 · Hawaii Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1915

    In Monroe v. Osborne, 43 N. J. … In Whitney v. Martine, 88 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jovanovic

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

    See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bolieu v. Our Lady of Compassion Care Center

    983 P.2d 1270 · Alaska Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1999

    Davis v. … Co. v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    3 Shan. Cas. 86 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879

    This canse of Simeon Cornick and wife v. Mary Brown et al. is referred *87 to in- this bill, and asked to be made exhibits and parts thereof. … See [Beeler v. Dunn], 3 Head, 90 , 91. In Roseborough v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    34 Tenn. 431 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1854

    . *435 This action in debt for $1167 86 was instituted in the circuit court of Davidson, by Brown & McCullough, against "Win. L. Brown, the defendant below.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    32 S.D. 216 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1913

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    12 S.D. 21 · South Dakota Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1899

    defendants kept and retained said wheat, and failed, refused, and neglected to deliver said wheat to plaintiff, or to pay her the market price therefor. ” After the summons had been served in Hutchinson county on the defendant Brown … As the service upon the defendant Brown was confessedly good, appellant’s motion to dismiss the action would not be entertainable in the absence of the following statute, within *23 which, the case clearly comes: ‘ ‘The summons

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.