Case law

Village of Westwood v. Board of Adjustment

811 S.W.2d 437 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1991

Missouri State Board of Mediation, 689 S.W.2d 51 (Mo. banc 1985), and we will affirm if it is supported by substantial evidence. See Eubanks v. Board of Adjustment, 768 S.W.2d 624 (Mo.App.1989). … Thus, the Board’s decision “is authorized by law and is supported by competent and substantial evidence upon the whole record.” Hamrick v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 739 S.W.2d 735, 737 (Mo.App.1987).

State Ex Rel. Thompson v. Board of Regents

305 Mo. 57 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 31, 1924

The'fund arising from such collections has been retained by the board and expended by it for the college. [State ex rel. v. Walker, 240 Mo. 1 . c. 724.] … [State ex rel. v. Gordon, 266 Mo. 412 ; Folk v. St. Louis, 250 Mo. 141 .]

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Nast

209 Mo. 708 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 27, 1908

It may and it has created boards with quasi-judicial functions, but those functions are not really judicial; they partake more of the character of ministerial offices.” In State ex rel. v. … [State v. Williams, 77 Mo. l. c. 313; State v. Bockstruck, 136 Mo. 335 ; State ex rel. v. Warner, 197 Mo. 650 .]

Bank of Crestwood v. State Banking Board

554 S.W.2d 519 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1977

V, §§ 1, 7, Const. of Mo., RSMo. Supp. 1975, and establishes an interpretation of the statutory law which in turn resolves the issues in the cases before us. … Walmar Investment Company v. Mueller, 512 S.W.2d 180, 182, 183 [1, 2] (Mo.App.1974).

State ex rel. Nesbitt v. Board of Education

53 Mo. 127 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1873

Stafford v. Saul

District Court, W.D. Missouri · Feb 7, 2022

Alhilfy v. Saul, No. 4:20-CV-00235-NKL, 2021 WL 462122, at *2 (W.D. Mo. Feb. 9, 2021) (quoting Brown v. Colvin, 825 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 2016)). … Tr. 672-73, 678-79; Brace v. Astrue, 578 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir. 2009) (“If an impairment can be controlled by treatment or medication, it cannot be considered disabling.” (quoting Brown v.

Young v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

221 S.W.3d 432 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2006

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Tiedemann

69 Mo. 306 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1879

In addition to the foregoing observations, it has been expressly decided by this court, that a school house and lot, title whereof is vested in a board of education, is not the subject of a mechanics’ lien. … Holland v. Mayor, 11 Md. 186 ; Mayor v. Porter, 18 Md. 284 ; Vogler v. Montgomery, 54 Mo. 577 ; Damschroeder v. Thias, 51 Mo. 100 ; McPike v. Pen, 51 Mo. 63 .

Board of Trade v. Donovan Commission Co.

121 F. 1012 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Apr 6, 1903

The main facts controlling these cases are stated and much of the evidence now before me is set out in the case of Board of Trade v. O’Dell Commission Company (C. … After careful consideration of the proof, it is found that the “continuous quotations” in question result largely from wagering on the future price of grain and hog products by the members of the board of trade operating

Board of Education v. City of St. Louis

267 Mo. 356 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 30, 1916

BROWN, C. This suit was instituted April 11, 1912, against the defendant city and Stephen IT. … We have carefully examined the authorities cited by the appellant and find but one, Pasadena School District v.

Boulch v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

186 S.W.3d 392 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 2005

ORDER The Missouri Board of Probation and Parole appeals the circuit court’s declaratory judgment that Mr. Boulch’s prior placement in a 120-day program under Mo. Ann.

Brown v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.

83 Mo. 478 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1884

Evans v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

192 S.W.3d 540 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 30, 2006

The Missouri Board of Probation and Parole appeals from the declaratory judgment of the Circuit Court of Cole County, Missouri, declaring, pursuant to § 559.115.7, RSMo Supp.2004, that the pri- or 120-day probationary incarceration

Missouri State Board of Pharmacy v. Kennedy

511 S.W.2d 913 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1974

Louis County v. State Tax Commission, 406 S.W.2d 644 (Mo. banc 1966); Wood v. Wagner Electric Corp., 355 Mo. 670 , 197 S.W.2d 647 (Mo. banc 1946); State ex rel. Bond v. Simmons, 299 S.W.2d 540 (Mo.App.1957). … Atley v. Williams, 472 S.W.2d 867, 869 (Mo.App.1971) and cases there cited. B.

Rosedale-Skinker Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Adjustment

425 S.W.2d 929 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1968

In Brown v. Beuc the landowner had a special permit to use a lot in a residential district for parking automobiles. … Zoning § 286, p. 1057; 58 Am.Jur., Zoning § 200, p. 1049; Brown v. Beuc, Mo.App., 384 S.W.2d 845, 851 [4]; Berard v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. Louis, Mo.App., 138 S.W.2d 731 , 733[1].

Kixmiller v. Board of Curators of Lincoln University

341 S.W.3d 711 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 17, 2011

Yarber v. … Brown v. Hannibal Anesthesia Serv., Inc., 972 S.W.2d 646, 647 n. 2 (Mo.App. E.D.1998).

State ex rel. Morris v. Board of Trustees

175 Mo. 52 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 27, 1903

The learned counsel for respondent rely on the following cases to sustain their contention that this is a religious corporation: State ex rel. v. Adams, 44 Mo. 570 ; McLaughlin v. Concordia College, 20 Mo. … [State ex rel. v. Ladies of the Sacred Heart, 99 Mo. 533 ; State ex rel. v. Lesueur, 141 Mo. 29 .]

Kossmeyer v. Missouri State Board of Accountancy

199 S.W.3d 778 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 2006

. *779 Louis, which affirmed the decisions of the Missouri Administrative Hearing Commission and the Missouri State Board of Accountancy to revoke his certificate and live permit to practice as a certified public accountant

Forsythe v. Board of Trustees of Park College

240 Mo. App. 622 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 10, 1948

It is stated in Brookfield v. Drury College, 139 Mo. App. 339 , l. c. 365, 123 S. … This rule is again recognized in Paisley v. Lucas, 346 Mo. 827 , l. c. 843, 143 S. W. 2d 262 , l. c. 271. It is also stated in 39 C.

State ex rel. Brown v. Dumphy

216 Mo. 293 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 1909

This is the second case mentioned in and tried with the case of this plaintiff v. A. C. Wilson, ante, page 215. The petition is the same as in the other cases except as herein stated. … Brown, collector of revenue of Lincoln county, Missouri, at whose relation and to whose use this suit is commenced, has no interest individually or as an officer in the subject-matter of the suit, and is made plaintiff herein