Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.80s
District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025
See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished65 S.W.2d 392 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 1933
Brown and wife, Carma Brown, only, the purported transfer of the lien from the Federal Land Bank to plaintiff, J. R. Brown, had been placed of record, and that thereupon, by amended' pleading, the said J. R. … Brown and F. E.
Cited 0 timesPublished684 So. 2d 940 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 6, 1996
In re Brown, Gayle Q.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of East Carroll, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 16,417; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 28441-CA.
Cited 0 timesPublished18 Tenn. 84 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1836
The bill charges that the defendant, Elizabeth Brown, got possession of the said will immediately after the death of her father, and that she and her husband, Charles V. … Brown, have suppressed or destroyed it, so that it cannot now be found. The answer of Charles V. Brown denies any knowledge of the existence of a will, or that he had any agency in its destruction.
Cited 0 timesPublished191 A.D.2d 301 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 18, 1993
Cited 1 timesPublished245 Pa. Super. 584 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1977
Cited 0 timesPublished240 Pa. Super. 702 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1976
Cited 0 timesPublished65 A.D.2d 936 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1978
Cited 0 timesPublished543 S.W.3d 620 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 2018
See Bugg v. Rutter , 466 S.W.3d 596 , 605 (Mo. App. 2015) (attorneys' fees and costs may be awarded under "special circumstances," such as in the case of a party's intentional misconduct); Klinkerfuss v. … Helstein v. Schmidt , 78 S.W.2d 132 , 135 (Mo. App. 1935).
Cited 10 timesPublished12 Ohio Law. Abs. 698 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1932
Brown had left him does not present, we think, a strong case on the part of the plaintiff in error. The deposit, according to the testimony of Mrs. … Brown and that she received the sum above stated from said estate. While this affidavit tends to detract from the testimony of Mrs.
Cited 0 timesPublished230 A.D. 716 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1930
Order denying motion of defendants Brown and Swasey for leave to serve a conditional cross complaint affirmed, without costs. … the denials contained in their answer, facts showing that tho trustee misappropriated and used in the purchase of the property in question the funds of the trust created for the appellants’ benefit by the will of Augusta Brown
Cited 0 timesPublished237 A.D. 881 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1933
Cited 0 timesPublished216 A.D. 725 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1926
Cited 0 timesPublished148 N.Y.S. 1107 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 5, 1914
Cited 0 timesPublished277 A.D.2d 857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 1950
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna