Case law

Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Johnson

115 A.D.3d 162 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2014

Plaintiff Brown & Brown, Inc. (BBI) is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Florida, and it is the parent corporation of plaintiff Brown & Brown of New York, Inc. (BBNY). … , 484-485 [2012]; Brown & Brown, Inc. v Mudron, 379 Ill App 3d 724, 727-728, 887 NE2d 437, 440 [2008]; Unisource Worldwide, Inc. v South Cent.

Brown v. Brown

1 D. Chip. 360 · Supreme Court of Vermont · Feb 15, 1815

V iewed in this light, it is unnecessary to resort to precedents to support the claim of the appellants; common sense and common feelings are sufficient to decide against every authority short of a positive law. *363 The

Brown v. Brown

635 So. 2d 893 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1994

Brown v. Brown

890 S.W.2d 378 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1994

Brown, appeals from the Jefferson County Circuit Court’s modification of the parties’ decree of dissolution as to child support. We affirm.

United States v. Jovanovic

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

Brown v. Brown

65 S.W.2d 392 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 1933

Brown and wife, Carma Brown, only, the purported transfer of the lien from the Federal Land Bank to plaintiff, J. R. Brown, had been placed of record, and that thereupon, by amended' pleading, the said J. R. … Brown and F. E.

Brown v. Brown

18 Tenn. 84 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1836

The bill charges that the defendant, Elizabeth Brown, got possession of the said will immediately after the death of her father, and that she and her husband, Charles V. … Brown, have suppressed or destroyed it, so that it cannot now be found. The answer of Charles V. Brown denies any knowledge of the existence of a will, or that he had any agency in its destruction.

Brown v. Brown

191 A.D.2d 301 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 18, 1993

Appeal of O'Rourke

220 N.W.2d 811 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 24, 1974

Tierney v. Dodge, 9 Minn. 166 ( Gil. 153 .)" [8] County of Brown v. Winona & St. … Chief Justice Gilfillan was the author of the opinion in both Brown and Leftwich. It may be noted, however, that Brown was more extensively quoted by a different justice in State ex rel. Board of County Commrs. v.

Brown v. Brown

245 Pa. Super. 584 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1977

Brown v. Brown

240 Pa. Super. 702 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1976

Brown v. Brown

26 Or. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 1976

Brown v. Brown

65 A.D.2d 936 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1978

Brown v. Brown

78 N.H. 337 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Feb 6, 1917

Brown v. Brown

12 Ohio Law. Abs. 698 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1932

Brown had left him does not present, we think, a strong case on the part of the plaintiff in error. The deposit, according to the testimony of Mrs. … Brown and that she received the sum above stated from said estate. While this affidavit tends to detract from the testimony of Mrs.

Brown-Thill v. Brown-Thill

543 S.W.3d 620 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 2018

See Bugg v. Rutter , 466 S.W.3d 596 , 605 (Mo. App. 2015) (attorneys' fees and costs may be awarded under "special circumstances," such as in the case of a party's intentional misconduct); Klinkerfuss v. … Helstein v. Schmidt , 78 S.W.2d 132 , 135 (Mo. App. 1935).

Brown v. Brown

23 N.Y.S. 1155 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 26, 1893

Brown v. Brown

5 Thomp. & Cook 691 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

Brown v. Brown

47 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 418 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1886

Brown v. Brown

230 A.D. 716 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1930

Order denying motion of defendants Brown and Swasey for leave to serve a conditional cross complaint affirmed, without costs. … the denials contained in their answer, facts showing that tho trustee misappropriated and used in the purchase of the property in question the funds of the trust created for the appellants’ benefit by the will of Augusta Brown