Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

2.02s

  • Heath v. Board of Commissioners

    297 N.C. 453 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1979

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lautenschlager v. Board of Transportation

    287 N.C. 260 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jordan v. Board of Commissioners

    245 N.C. 290 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 11, 1957

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robertson v. . Board of Education

    192 N.C. 765 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1926

    It is conceded that there is no legislative authority for the board of education to purchase said land, or for the board of county commissioners to issue said bonds. … Tate v. Board of Education of McDowell County, ante, 516. Chapter 120, Public Laws 1924, Extra Session, does not apply to Yancey County.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Woodhouse v. Board of Commissioners

    298 N.C. 305 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1979

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Church v. Board of Education

    292 N.C. 264 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Evans

    285 N.C. 588 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clary v. Board of Education

    285 N.C. 597 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 15, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Clary v. Board of Education

    284 N.C. 424 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 4, 1973

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McNeill v. Durham County ABC Board

    322 N.C. 425 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1988

    See Board of Transportation v. Wilder, 28 N.C. App. 105 , 220 S.E. 2d 183 (1975). *428 Our review is limited to the record. … State v. Frazier, 278 N.C. 458, 460 , 180 S.E. 2d 128, 130 (1971).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Griffin v. BOARD OF COM'RS

    319 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1987

    GRIFFIN v. The BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF the LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS' BENEFIT AND RETIREMENT FUND. No. 143P87. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 2, 1987.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Transportation v. Harvey

    28 N.C. App. 327 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 7, 1976

    Glenn v. Raleigh, 246 N.C. 469 , 98 S.E. 2d 913 (1957). In the case before us, the issue was the amount of damages the defendants were entitled to recover. … G.S. 136-112(1). *330 See Highway Commission v. Black, 239 N.C. 198 , 79 S.E. 2d 778 (1954); Proctor v. Highway Commission, 230 N.C. 687 , 55 S.E. 2d 479 (1949) ; Highway Commission v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Transportation v. Pierce

    301 N.C. 527 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1980

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Transportation v. Annas

    298 N.C. 293 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1979

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Loughlin v. Board of Registration

    292 N.C. 467 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Transportation v. Harrison

    22 N.C. App. 193 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Lamm

    276 N.C. 183 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1970

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wolfenden v. Board of Commissioners

    152 N.C. 83 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 9, 1910

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eshon v. Board of Commissioners

    95 N.C. 75 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1886

    Warren deposited with me, notes, amounting to $219.94, payable to himself, secured by mortgage on real estate, and verbally instructed me to hold them, as security for the costs of the appeal, in the case of Eshon v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wells v. Board of Commissioners

    152 N.C. 663 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 27, 1910

    Brown, J. As we construe the act to improve the public roads in Yalleytown Township in Cherokee County, ch. 210, Laws 1905, this proceeding cannot be maintained. … We agree with his Honor that the mandamus is sought to enforce a money demand, but in our opinion it is not a money demand payable from the general funds of Cherokee County, and a mandamus will not lie against its board of

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.