Case law

Wilson v. Turner

4 Mo. 274 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1836

Wilson, to Turner and Brown Dr. … The counsel for the petitioners contends that this is a note, and cites Hubbard v. Beckwith, p. 492 1st vol. of Bibb’s reports.

Christiansen v. Missouri State Board of Accountancy

764 S.W.2d 952 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 6, 1988

The Board has .directed this court’s attention to the case of Watson v. … Warren v. Warren, 601 S.W.2d 683, 687 (Mo.App. 1980); Central Moloney, Inc. v. City of St. Louis, 627 S.W.2d 39, 41 (Mo.App.1975). In support of its position, the Board cites the case of Payne v. St.

Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

444 F. Supp. 473 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 17, 1978

); Brown v. … All paroles shall issue upon order of the board, duly adopted.” 10 . Although Scarpa has been dismissed as moot, 501 F.2d 992 (1973), the Fifth Circuit has substantially readopted the reasoning of that case in Brown v.

State ex rel. Tedford v. Knott

207 Mo. 167 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 27, 1907

[State ex rel. v. May, 106 Mo. 488 .] … [State ex rel. v. Walbridge, 1191 Mo. l. c. 394 and 395; Wickham v. Page, 49 Mo. 526 ; Brown v. *176 Weatherly, 71 Mo. 152 .]

Campbell v. Personnel Board of Kansas City

666 S.W.2d 806 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1984

Younge v. State Board of Registration for Healing Arts, 451 S.W.2d 346 (Mo.1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 922 (1970). … Board of Fire and Police Commissioners, 90 Ill.App.2d 31 , 234 N.E.2d 339 (1967)[5]; Leeks v. State, 95 Okl.Cr.App. 326, 245 P.2d 764 (1952)[14-16].”

Jeannie Owens v. Missouri State Board of Nursing

474 S.W.3d 607 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 2015

In State v. … In Fee v.

Johnson v. BOARD OF POLICE COM'RS

370 F. Supp. 2d 892 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 27, 2005

Switzer, III, Steven Brown, Missouri Attorney General's Office, St. Louis, MO, for Defendants Board of Police Commissioners: Jo Ann Freeman, Susan C.J. Rollins, Bartholomew Saracino, Michael J. Quinn, and Francis G. … Louis Board of Police Commissioners ("Police Board").

Bantle v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

256 S.W.3d 205 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2008

Bantle sought a declaratory judgment from the trial court to determine *206 whether the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole (the Board) had correctly calculated his prison term. … Bantle alleges that this violates the holding in Jackson v. Kaiser, 353 Mo. 919 , 185 S.W.2d 784 (1945).

Roy F. Stamm Electric Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.

350 Mo. 1178 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 5, 1943

Kansas City v. Jones Store Co., 325 Mo. 226 , 28 S. W. (2d) 1008 ; McDermott v. Claas, 104 Mo. 14 , 15 S. W. 995 . … Deal & Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 349 Mo. 275 , 160 S. W. (2d) 719 , we held that the court should enter a general judgment against the bankrupt’s estate. Respondent cites Holland v. Cunliff, 96 Mo. App. 67 .

Blackmon v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole

97 S.W.3d 458 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 14, 2003

disinformation;” (5) the new regulations granting parole review every five years, instead of every two years under the old regulations, are unconstitutional; (6) other prisoners have received more favorable consideration by the board … Const, article V, section 3. The circuit court treated the claims as a petition for writ of habeas corpus and denied relief. There is no appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. E.W. v.

Muhammad v. Brown

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Sep 18, 2025

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). … See also Hudson v.

Howard v. Missouri State Board of Education

847 S.W.2d 187 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1993

In Gast v. … Director of Revenue, 804 S.W.2d 22, 25 (Mo. banc 1991), the propriety of the Board’s order of revocation. In Killeron v. American Bankers Ins.

Langston v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

325 S.W.3d 562 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 2010

Langston sought a declaration that the Board had erroneously *564 determined that he would never be eligible for parole and miscalculated his parole eligibility in contradiction to § 217.690(4) and Wolfe v. … Bugg v. Roper, 179 S.W.3d 893, 894 (Mo. banc 2005). The Board’s argument that this rule applies to this case is, however, fundamentally flawed.

Kukuljan v. Metropolitan Board of Police Commissioners

871 S.W.2d 119 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1994

Our review is limited to a determination of whether the Board’s findings and order are supported by competent and substantial evidence. Jackson v. Sayad, 741 S.W.2d 847, 850 (Mo.App.1987). … The Board is vested with broad discretion to impose discipline for the violation of department rules and regulations. State ex rel. Baer v. Campbell, 794 S.W.2d 690, 691 (Mo.App.1990).

Verna Properties, LLC v. Board of Adjustment

188 S.W.3d 50 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 2006

Co., Inc., 170 S.W.3d at 50 (quoting Wolfner v. Board of Adj. City of Warson Woods, 114 S.W.3d 298, 303 (Mo.App. E.D.2003)). … Cousin’s Adver., Inc. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City, 78 S.W.3d 774, 783 (Mo.App. W.D.2002).

Brown v. Hampton

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 8, 2025

AgriStor Leasing v. Farrow, 826 F.2d 732, 734 (8th Cir. 1987) (first citing Econ. Hous. Co. v. Cont’l Forest Prods., Inc., 757 F.2d 200, 203 (8th Cir. 1985); and then citing Holloway v. … See, e.g., Jones v.

Howard v. Missouri State Board of Education

913 S.W.2d 887 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1995

North Callaway Board of Education, 777 S.W.2d 275, 276 (Mo.App.1989) (quoting Lopez v. Vance, 509 S.W.2d 197, 202 (Mo.App.1974)). … See also Younge v.

Township Board ex rel. Feitz v. McPhearson

172 Mo. App. 369 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 1913

[State v. Feitz, 154 Mo. App. 578 .] … In this respect the case differs from Moore v. Hawk, 57 Mo. App. 495 , relied upon by relator.

Duvall v. Coordinating Board for Higher Education

873 S.W.2d 856 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1994

The Board next contends that Duvall has no standing as a taxpayer because his petition fails to allege an increased tax burden. The Board relies on Brock v. City of St. … Sullivan v. Carlisle, 851 S.W.2d 510, 512 [1—3] (Mo. banc 1993). In this case Duvall pleaded that certain rules, policies and procedures of the Board were illegal for stated reasons.

Anselmo v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

27 S.W.3d 831 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2000

Jones v. Carnahan, 965 S.W.2d 209, 214 (Mo.App.1998). Roy v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, 23 S.W.3d 738, 742-43 (Mo.App.W.D.2000). … Cavallaro v. Groose, 908 S.W.2d 133, 135 (Mo. banc 1995). The Board has almost unlimited discretion in whether to grant parole release. Id.