Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.33s
Ott v. United States Board of Parole
324 F. Supp. 1034 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 4, 1971
Following the rule of the decision in this Court in Langston v. … The above statute, it has been said, vests the matter of granting parole into the “almost unreviewable” discretion of the Board of Parole. Hyser v.
Cited 12 timesPublished768 S.W.2d 100 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1988
City of Richmond Heights v. Board of Equalization, 586 S.W.2d 338, 342 (Mo. banc 1979). A contested case does not mean every case in which there may be a contest about rights, duties or privileges. Id. … Abney v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Co., 608 S.W.2d 576, 578 (Mo.App.1980); Holt v. Rabun, 519 S.W.2d 561, 562 (Mo.App.1975).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcLaughlin v. Board of Education
659 S.W.2d 249 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1983
The narrow construction of the word “position” urged by appellant here was rejected in Carter County R — I School District v. Palmer, 627 S.W.2d 664 (Mo.App.1982). … Carter County R-I School District v. Palmer, 627 S.W.2d at 666 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedCody v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
111 S.W.3d 547 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2003
Coats v. Hickman, 11 S.W.3d 798, 807 (Mo.App.1999). … Slankard v. Thomas, 912 S.W.2d 619, 628 (Mo.App.1995).
Cited 6 timesPublished689 S.W.2d 825 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1985
The findings of the AHC and the MDB are not supported by competent and substantial evidence based upon the whole record, as required by the holding in State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. … In Consumer Contact Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMozee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
401 S.W.3d 500 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 2013
In McDermott v. … Edger v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 307 S.W.3d 718 (Mo.App.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMcDermott v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
61 S.W.3d 246 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 2001
The trial court sustained the board of probation and parole’s motion for summary judgment and entered judgment against McDermott. … State v. Bolin, 643 S.W.2d 806, 811 (Mo. banc 1983).
Cited 7 timesPublishedSt. Louis Board of Education v. Shannon
640 S.W.2d 121 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 12, 1982
The Board of Education informed him his injury was not job related and therefore not compensable under the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Law. Mr. … Diemer v. Weiss, 343 Mo. 626, 627 , 122 S.W.2d 922, 923 (1938). A statute is presumed constitutional unless it clearly contravenes some constitutional provision. Prokopf v. Whaley, 592 S.W.2d 819, 824 (Mo. banc 1980).
Cited 7 timesPublishedWilkins v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
374 S.W.3d 359 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 2012
Wilkins appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition seeking a declaratory judgment against the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole. The trial court found Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRainwater v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF GREENVILLE
645 S.W.2d 172 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1982
In Board of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools, Etc. v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 781-782 (Mo. banc 1976), a board of education terminated the indefinite contract of a permanent teacher. … In Conder v.
Cited 6 timesPublished124 Mo. App. 450 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1907
Henry V. Brown, on his mother’s side. The contest is- between these parties. Mrs. Brown says her daughter, who was the wife of Fred C. … Brown and her husband. The return of Mrs.
Cited 3 timesPublishedIrvin v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
34 S.W.3d 202 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2000
See Boersig v. … Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 30 , 101 S.Ct. 960, 965 , 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981). In State v. Frederick, 783 S.W.2d 469, 472 (Mo.App.
Cited 6 timesPublishedGurley v. Missouri Board of Private Investigator Examiners
361 S.W.3d 406 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 2012
V, sec. 3. 7 III. … See United States v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedJohnson v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
359 S.W.3d 500 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2012
Denbow v. State, 309 S.W.3d 831, 834 (Mo. App.2010). … Moore v. State, 318 S.W.3d 726, 734 (Mo. App.2010).
Cited 2 timesPublishedWatley v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole
863 S.W.2d 337 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1992
Brown v. St. Louis County, 792 S.W.2d 398, 401 (Mo.App.1990). … See Tomich v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 585 F.Supp. 939, 940 (W.D.Mo.1984).
Cited 8 timesPublishedState of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Delvin Brown
Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2020
Louis v. ) ) DELVIN BROWN, ) Honorable Jason … State v. Henry, 568 S.W.3d 464, 470 (Mo. App. E.D. 2019), citing State v. Watson, 407 S.W.3d 180, 184 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHighlands Homes Ass'n v. Board of Adjustment
306 S.W.3d 561 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2009
“A board may consider the hearsay testimony of city staff members received without objection.” Baumer v. City of Jennings, 247 S.W.3d 105, 113 (Mo.App. E.D.2008); State ex rel. Sander v. … Repeated grants of variances on this issue could possibly constitute an abuse of the Board’s discretion. 3 See Wehrle v. Cassor, 708 S.W.2d 788, 791 (Mo.App.
Cited 2 timesPublishedLagud v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners
136 S.W.3d 786 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 22, 2004
He and the Board both state that, in applying this provision, this Court is to consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the Board’s decision. But, in Hampton v. … See Rogers v.
Cited 61 timesPublishedExecutive Board v. Windermere Baptist Conference Center, Inc.
430 S.W.3d 274 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2014
Haynes Family Corp. v. Dean Properties, Inc., 928 S.W.2d 465 , 466[2] (Mo. App. S.D.1996); Amparan v. Martinez, 862 S.W.2d 497, 498 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). … See Willis v. Missouri Farm Bureau Services, Inc., 396 S.W.3d 451, 454 (Mo.App. W.D.2013). Here, The Executive Board’s failure to comply with Rule 84.04 is so serious as to impede our appellate review. See Yates v.
Cited 18 timesPublished4 Mo. 274 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1836
Wilson, to Turner and Brown Dr. … The counsel for the petitioners contends that this is a note, and cites Hubbard v. Beckwith, p. 492 1st vol. of Bibb’s reports.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna