Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

1.33s

  • Ott v. United States Board of Parole

    324 F. Supp. 1034 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 4, 1971

    Following the rule of the decision in this Court in Langston v. … The above statute, it has been said, vests the matter of granting parole into the “almost unreviewable” discretion of the Board of Parole. Hyser v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Board of Trustees

    768 S.W.2d 100 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1988

    City of Richmond Heights v. Board of Equalization, 586 S.W.2d 338, 342 (Mo. banc 1979). A contested case does not mean every case in which there may be a contest about rights, duties or privileges. Id. … Abney v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Co., 608 S.W.2d 576, 578 (Mo.App.1980); Holt v. Rabun, 519 S.W.2d 561, 562 (Mo.App.1975).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McLaughlin v. Board of Education

    659 S.W.2d 249 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1983

    The narrow construction of the word “position” urged by appellant here was rejected in Carter County R — I School District v. Palmer, 627 S.W.2d 664 (Mo.App.1982). … Carter County R-I School District v. Palmer, 627 S.W.2d at 666 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cody v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    111 S.W.3d 547 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 5, 2003

    Coats v. Hickman, 11 S.W.3d 798, 807 (Mo.App.1999). … Slankard v. Thomas, 912 S.W.2d 619, 628 (Mo.App.1995).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ordo v. Missouri Dental Board

    689 S.W.2d 825 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1985

    The findings of the AHC and the MDB are not supported by competent and substantial evidence based upon the whole record, as required by the holding in State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. … In Consumer Contact Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mozee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    401 S.W.3d 500 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 2013

    In McDermott v. … Edger v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 307 S.W.3d 718 (Mo.App.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McDermott v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    61 S.W.3d 246 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 18, 2001

    The trial court sustained the board of probation and parole’s motion for summary judgment and entered judgment against McDermott. … State v. Bolin, 643 S.W.2d 806, 811 (Mo. banc 1983).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • St. Louis Board of Education v. Shannon

    640 S.W.2d 121 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 12, 1982

    The Board of Education informed him his injury was not job related and therefore not compensable under the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Law. Mr. … Diemer v. Weiss, 343 Mo. 626, 627 , 122 S.W.2d 922, 923 (1938). A statute is presumed constitutional unless it clearly contravenes some constitutional provision. Prokopf v. Whaley, 592 S.W.2d 819, 824 (Mo. banc 1980).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Wilkins v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    374 S.W.3d 359 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 2012

    Wilkins appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition seeking a declaratory judgment against the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole. The trial court found Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rainwater v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF GREENVILLE

    645 S.W.2d 172 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1982

    In Board of Education, Mt. Vernon Schools, Etc. v. Shank, 542 S.W.2d 779, 781-782 (Mo. banc 1976), a board of education terminated the indefinite contract of a permanent teacher. … In Conder v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Boutelle v. Boutelle

    124 Mo. App. 450 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1907

    Henry V. Brown, on his mother’s side. The contest is- between these parties. Mrs. Brown says her daughter, who was the wife of Fred C. … Brown and her husband. The return of Mrs.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Irvin v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    34 S.W.3d 202 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2000

    See Boersig v. … Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 30 , 101 S.Ct. 960, 965 , 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981). In State v. Frederick, 783 S.W.2d 469, 472 (Mo.App.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Gurley v. Missouri Board of Private Investigator Examiners

    361 S.W.3d 406 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 6, 2012

    V, sec. 3. 7 III. … See United States v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    359 S.W.3d 500 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2012

    Denbow v. State, 309 S.W.3d 831, 834 (Mo. App.2010). … Moore v. State, 318 S.W.3d 726, 734 (Mo. App.2010).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Watley v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

    863 S.W.2d 337 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1992

    Brown v. St. Louis County, 792 S.W.2d 398, 401 (Mo.App.1990). … See Tomich v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 585 F.Supp. 939, 940 (W.D.Mo.1984).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Delvin Brown

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2020

    Louis v. ) ) DELVIN BROWN, ) Honorable Jason … State v. Henry, 568 S.W.3d 464, 470 (Mo. App. E.D. 2019), citing State v. Watson, 407 S.W.3d 180, 184 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Highlands Homes Ass'n v. Board of Adjustment

    306 S.W.3d 561 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 2009

    “A board may consider the hearsay testimony of city staff members received without objection.” Baumer v. City of Jennings, 247 S.W.3d 105, 113 (Mo.App. E.D.2008); State ex rel. Sander v. … Repeated grants of variances on this issue could possibly constitute an abuse of the Board’s discretion. 3 See Wehrle v. Cassor, 708 S.W.2d 788, 791 (Mo.App.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lagud v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners

    136 S.W.3d 786 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 22, 2004

    He and the Board both state that, in applying this provision, this Court is to consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the Board’s decision. But, in Hampton v. … See Rogers v.

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Executive Board v. Windermere Baptist Conference Center, Inc.

    430 S.W.3d 274 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 2014

    Haynes Family Corp. v. Dean Properties, Inc., 928 S.W.2d 465 , 466[2] (Mo. App. S.D.1996); Amparan v. Martinez, 862 S.W.2d 497, 498 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). … See Willis v. Missouri Farm Bureau Services, Inc., 396 S.W.3d 451, 454 (Mo.App. W.D.2013). Here, The Executive Board’s failure to comply with Rule 84.04 is so serious as to impede our appellate review. See Yates v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Turner

    4 Mo. 274 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1836

    Wilson, to Turner and Brown Dr. … The counsel for the petitioners contends that this is a note, and cites Hubbard v. Beckwith, p. 492 1st vol. of Bibb’s reports.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.