Case law

State v. Battle

408 S.C. 109 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Apr 23, 2014

State v. Brown, 362 S.C. 258, 261 , 607 S.E.2d 93, 95 (Ct.App.2004). “To warrant reversal, a trial judge’s refusal to give a requested jury charge must be both erroneous and prejudicial to the defendant.” … See State v.

Brown v. Brown

817 So. 2d 588 · Court of Appeals of Mississippi · Mar 5, 2002

Matt Brown was granted a divorce from Stephanie Cummings Brown on the grounds of habitual cruel and inhuman treatment. Stephanie was awarded $300 per month rehabilitative alimony for thirty-six months. … In Kergosien v.

Kennon Copeland v. Greene County Board of Supervisors

Court of Appeals of Virginia · Apr 14, 2026

v. GREENE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ET AL. … Brown v. Jacobs, 289 Va. 209, 215 (2015). A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of alleged facts, and we treat those facts as true without accepting the pleader’s legal conclusions. Murayama 1997 Trust v.

Sida of Hawaii, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

512 F.2d 354 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 24, 1975

NLRB v. United Insurance Co., 390 U.S. 254, 256 , 88 S.Ct. 988 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1083 (1968). Brown v. NLRB, 462 F.2d 699 , 702 (9th Cir. 1972). … As this court reaffirmed in Brown, we cannot uphold the Board where it has in its “application of the law to the facts overlooked accepted principles of the law of agency . . . .” 462 F.2d at 702, quoting Carnation Co. v.

In Re Validation of up to $27,600,000 Trust Certificates Evidencing Proportional Interests in a Lease by The Simpson County School District: Thomas Floyd, Ray Floyd, Lee McCoy, and Jason McCoy v. Simpson County School Board

Mississippi Supreme Court · Nov 14, 2024

Huey Stockstill, Inc. v. Hales, 730 So. 2d 539, 544 (Miss. 1998). “In Walters v. … Floyd relies on Sinquefield v.

Brown v. Brown

142 S.W. 23 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 14, 1911

Brown, as the guardian of the estate of Joe Brown, Jr., minor son of the applicant. … Revised Statutes, art. 1018; Stephenville Oil Mill v. McNeill, 122 S. W. 911 ; Hess v. Webb (Sup.) 123 S. W. 111 ; Rules 25 and 26 ( 67 S. W. xv ).

Brown v. Brown

70 Ohio App. 41 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 1942

Appellee urges upon us two Massachusetts cases, Thurston v. Thurston, 99 Mass., 39 , and Bradley v. Bradley, 160 Mass., 258 , 35 N. E., 482 . … Seemingly these cases support the appellee’s view; but if the later case of Wight v. Wight, 272 Mass., 154 , 172 N.

Brown v. Brown

99 W. Va. 615 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1925

In Bridgman v. Bridgman, 30 W. … Lessee of Lore v. Truman, 10 O. S. 45, 55; Moss v. Ashbrooke, 12 Ark. (7 Eng.) 369; Detrick v. Sharrar, 95 Pa. St. 521, 525; 2 Van Fleet Former Adjudication, Sec. 305; Poole v. Dilworth, 26 W. Va. 583 ; Biern v.

Brown v. Brown

90 Miss. 410 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1907

The case was precisely within the principles announced in the case of Berry v. Bullock, 81 Miss., 463 , 33 South., 410 , and the authorities therein cited.

Brown v. Brown

28 Or. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 1977

Abraham v. Abraham, 248 Or 163, 164 , 432 P2d 797 (1967); Cook and Cook, 27 Or App 467 , 556 P2d 707 (1976); Baker and Baker, 22 Or App 555 , 540 P2d 388 (1975).

Brown v. Brown

31 Wash. App. 1083 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 17, 1982

Dieter v. Prime Computer, Inc.

681 A.2d 1068 · Court of Chancery of Delaware · May 24, 1996

See Brown v. Automated Mktg. Sys., Inc., Del.Ch., C.A. No. 6715, Brown, V.C. (Mar. 22, 1982), Mem. op. at 3, 1982 WL 8782 . … (Apr. 22, 1992), Mem. op. at 10, 1992 WL 82365 ; Zirn v. VLI Corp., Del.Ch., C.A. No. 9488, Hartnett, V.C. (Feb. 15, 1991), Mem. op. at 16, 1991 WL 20378 ; Singer v. Magnavox, De l.Ch., C.A. No. 4929, Brown, V.C.

Vranicar v. Board of Com'rs of Brown County

730 N.E.2d 752 · Indiana Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 2000

Vranicar and Colin Reeves (collectively, Petitioners) appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their action seeking review of the decision of the Brown County Board of Commissioners (the Board) which refused to vacate a pub- … For example, in Smith v.

Andrei Skripkov v. William P. Barr

966 F.3d 480 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 20, 2020

Standard of review “Where the Board affirms the IJ’s ruling but adds its own comments, we review both the IJ’s decision and the Board’s additional remarks.” Karimijanaki v. … See Berhane v. Holder, 606 F.3d 819, 825 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding that deference “does not require upholding a Board decision without regard to whether there is a reasoned basis for it”); see also Castro v.

Brown v. Brown

680 So. 2d 321 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Jun 21, 1996

Brown’s life insurance policy. The first wife appealed the judgment of the district court; the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed that judgment in Brown v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. … “This conversion of a state law claim into a federal claim is sometimes called ‘super preemption,’ Brown v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co., 934 F.2d 1193, 1196 (11th Cir.1991).” Hemphill v.

Brown v. Brown

987 So. 2d 656 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Apr 21, 2006

Johnson v. Bayhealth Medical Center

Superior Court of Delaware · May 22, 2026

The requirements regarding Board certification apply only if the defendant is a physician. Zappaterrini v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc., 2009 WL 1101618, at *1 (Del. Super. … Co. v.

Brown v. Brown

54 A.D. 6 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1900

I give, devise and bequeath to my children, John Brown, Sebastian Brown and Edward Brown, all of the. real estate of which I shall die seized and possessed, share and share alike, *7 providing however, that said real estate … (Oxley v. Lane, 35 N. Y. 349 ; Harrison v. Harrison, 36 id. 543; Henderson v. Henderson, 113 id. 1.)

Brown v. Brown

49 Mass. 573 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1844

One of the strongest of these, perhaps, among the recent cases, is the case of Smith v.

Brown v. Brown

263 A.D.2d 455 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 6, 1999

of discretion for the trial court, which is in the best position to determine whether a mistrial is required under the circumstances of the case, and its decision must be accorded great deference (see, Matter of Plummer v … Accordingly, there is no bar to a retrial (see, Matter of Plummer v Rothwax, supra; Matter of Martin v Hynes, 259 AD2d 547 ; Matter of Spivack v Brown, 259 AD2d 488 ).