Case law

Hubbard v. Board of Adjustment

779 S.W.2d 26 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1989

The petition named the Board of Adjustment of the City of St. Louis (Board) as defendant. … of said board is jurisdictional.”

Egan v. Missouri State Board of Registration

437 S.W.3d 351 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 2014

Robert Egan appeals from the circuit court’s judgment affirming the discipline imposed by the State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (“Board”) after a finding by the Administrative Hearing Commission (“AHC”) of

Robinson v. Board of Trustees

768 S.W.2d 100 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1988

City of Richmond Heights v. Board of Equalization, 586 S.W.2d 338, 342 (Mo. banc 1979). A contested case does not mean every case in which there may be a contest about rights, duties or privileges. Id. … Abney v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Co., 608 S.W.2d 576, 578 (Mo.App.1980); Holt v. Rabun, 519 S.W.2d 561, 562 (Mo.App.1975).

Lawrence v. Board of Police Com'rs

604 F. Supp. 1229 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 3, 1985

Louis Board of Police Commissioners can only be obtained by suing its individual members. Sparks v. St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners, No. 84-384C(3) (E.D.Mo., Apr. 25, 1984); Best v. … Defendants also argue for the dismissal of the Board members from the state law claim in Count I on the theory that respondeat superior is inapplicable. Reenie v.

Ridinger v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

189 S.W.3d 658 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 2006

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Board. Mr. Ridinger filed this appeal. Standard of Review Appellate review of a summary judgment is de novo. Boersig v. Mo. … In Irvin v. Kempker, 152 S.W.3d 358, 362 (Mo.App.

Ordo v. Missouri Dental Board

689 S.W.2d 825 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1985

The findings of the AHC and the MDB are not supported by competent and substantial evidence based upon the whole record, as required by the holding in State Board of Registration for Healing Arts v. … In Consumer Contact Co. v.

Wilkins v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

374 S.W.3d 359 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 2012

Wilkins appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition seeking a declaratory judgment against the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole. The trial court found Mr.

Charron v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

403 S.W.3d 692 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 2013

Char-ron’s current suit alleges that the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole has violated his rights in connection with its determinations as to his eligibility for parole and/or conditional release.

Minion v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

411 S.W.3d 338 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 2013

H. B. Deal & Co. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.

349 Mo. 275 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 26, 1942

Co. v. Gymnastic Assn., 332 Mo. 440, 58 , S. W. (2d) 995; Martin-Welch Hdw., etc., Co. v. Spencer (Mo. App.), 214 S. W. 417 ; Baker v. Smallwood, 161 Mo. App. 257 , 143 S. W. 518 ; Planing Mill, etc., Co. v. … [Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co., 334 Mo. 517 , l. c. 527, 66 S. W. (2d) 903 .] There the assets of defendant were being administered by a receiver appointed by a federal court.

Hawkes v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

410 S.W.3d 267 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2013

ORDER PER CURIAM: Walter Hawkes appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Cole County granting the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in his declaratory judgment action against the Missouri Board

Braeshire Condominium Board of Managers v. Brinkmeyer

841 S.W.2d 217 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1992

Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). … The Board relies primarily on two cases: Lake Tishomingo Property Owners Association v. Cronin, 679 S.W.2d 852 (Mo. banc 1984), and Colvin v. Carr, 799 S.W.2d 153 (Mo.App.1990).

Watley v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

863 S.W.2d 337 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1992

Brown v. St. Louis County, 792 S.W.2d 398, 401 (Mo.App.1990). … See Tomich v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 585 F.Supp. 939, 940 (W.D.Mo.1984).

Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

398 S.W.3d 87 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 2013

Lee, Sr. filed a petition for declaratory judgment that claimed the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole improperly calculated when he would be eligible for parole, conditional release, or other early release under section … Lee argues that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition because the Board presented no evidence that prove that the alleged prior prison commitments were prison commitments as a matter of law. We affirm.

Selby v. North Callaway Board of Education

777 S.W.2d 275 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 5, 1989

Rainwater v. Board of Education of Greenville, supra, at 176-77; Rafael v. Meramec Valley R-III Board of Education, supra, at 309, 315; Pollard v. … Pollard v. Board of Education Reorganized School, supra, at 671.

Oglebay v. Kansas City Board of Trade

99 Mo. App. 433 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1903

The attorney of the Board of Trade then prepared a lease from the Trust Company to the Board of Trade, which was executed by the trust company but while said attorney was reading’ it to the officers of the board of trade, … party is to have the option of renewing the lease from year to year, which option may be exercised from year to year for five years from July 1, 1898,” Upon principle,- this question falls within the rule applied in Donovan v.

Lee v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

391 S.W.3d 927 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 2013

The petition alleged that the Board of Probation and Parole erroneously relied on false information in denying Lee parole thus denying Lee due process.

State Ex Rel. Division of Family Services v. Brown

897 S.W.2d 154 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1995

Shoemaker v. Shoemaker, 812 S.W.2d 250, 256 [14] (Mo.App.W.D.1991); McCammon v. McCammon, 680 S.W.2d 196, 202 [12] (Mo.App.W.D.1984). However, Welch v. … In Crawford v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Spencer v. Board of Police Commissioners

564 F. Supp. 1222 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Jun 3, 1983

Sindermann, supra, and Board of Regents v. … In Roberts v. Browning, 610 F.2d 528, 531 (8 Cir.1979), the Eighth Circuit reiterated its frequently stated view that “summary judgment is a harsh remedy and should be granted sparingly.”

McLaughlin v. Board of Education

659 S.W.2d 249 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 2, 1983

The narrow construction of the word “position” urged by appellant here was rejected in Carter County R — I School District v. Palmer, 627 S.W.2d 664 (Mo.App.1982). … Carter County R-I School District v. Palmer, 627 S.W.2d at 666 .