Case law

Burkhardt v. City of Enid

771 P.2d 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1989

Clearly the term was adequately defined to communicate the purpose of the tax. It was equally clear that tax proceeds would be used to purchase Phillips’ assets. … If no new university is established, the funds return to EEDA for debt reduction or economic development.

Bigheart Pipeline Corp. v. United States

600 F. Supp. 50 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 18, 1984

To qualify as a protected “purchaser” under § 6323, a third party who acquires an interest in property of the taxpayer must be protected against subsequent purchasers without actual notice under local law. § 6323(h)(6). … The Court believes under § 6321 and applicable case law, a federal tax lien clearly may attach to a contingent interest.

Lightle v. State

5 Okla. Crim. 259 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1911

The evidence in the case amply sustains the allegations contained in the, information, viz., that this “Amber Mead” yas a substitute for beer, and that it came clearly and fully within the provisions of the statute whether … He could simply say, “I did not know or I had been misinformed as to a matter of fact,” and this would grant him perfect immunity from punishment.

Robinson v. Oglala Sioux Tribe

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 16, 2025

abrogated that immunity and the tribe has not clearly waived its immunity.” … Because the Tribe enjoys tribal sovereign immunity, to establish subject-matter jurisdiction, Plaintiff must show that the Tribe has waived that immunity, or that Congress has abrogated it.

White v. City of Del City

270 P.3d 205 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2011

City contends that it cannot be held liable for any intentional or unintentional misrepresentations because it is immune from suit for such claims pursuant to the Governmental Tort Claims Act, 51 0.8.2001 and 0.8. … Finding that the City is immune from suit for defamation, we decline to address City's argument that there can be no viable action for defamation when the publication originates with the claimant, rather than a third party

Sisk v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.

81 P.3d 55 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 8, 2003

The former situation, in Hooper, supra note 6 , addressed whether a harm-dealing servant's law-conferred (parental) immunity operates to discharge the master's respondeat-superior liability to a third party. … In Hooper we answered in the negative by holding that servant's law-conferred immunity does not constitute an ex Zege release of the master.

Opinion No. 76-392 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 28, 1977

If a school district qualifies under the rules and regulations which the State Board of Education is hereby authorized to promulgate, such district shall be allocated Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000.00) per pro gram. … This provision clearly provides that local school districts, subject to the respective rules and regulations promulgated by the State Board of Education, may apply for and receive a $6,000.00 grant (per program) for: (1)

Balduff Et Ux. v. Griswold

9 Okla. 438 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1900

He then had such an interest in the real estate as clearly entitled him to redeem from the deed executed to Bal-duff as security for his loan. … The effect is the same, and clearly entitles him to redeem. In Carr v. Carr, 52 N.

Thompson v. United States Ex Rel. Brown

493 F. Supp. 28 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 23, 1980

The United States asserts that Plaintiff’s claim in his first cause of action for medical negligence concerning his enlistment is clearly within the purview of Feres v. … In establishing a judicial exemption to the Federal Tort Claims Act, the Supreme Court in Feres v.

Kinney ex rel. Kinney v. Sullivan

746 F. Supp. 1067 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1990

The record clearly shows that Rebecca Kinney and McNelious Jones, Jr. never intermarried prior to his death. The record also clearly shows that Mr. … The evidence in this case also clearly establishes that Mr.

Womack v. Schmidt

74 O.B.A.J. 3159 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 19, 2003

As in D.M.J., ICWA did not apply to the Womaeks' request to adopt B.R.W. without Mother's consent because they are clearly not attempting to "break-up an Indian family" nor attempting to interrupt the "continued custody" … Section 1912(f) of the ICWA provides: No termination of parental rights may be ordered in such proceeding in the absence of a determination, supported by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, including testimony of qualified

Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris

377 P.2d 42 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1962

Qualified privilege, however, has broader scope. Definitions of qualified privilege are usually very general in nature and difficult of precise construction. See 53 C.J.S. Libel and Slander § 89 et seq.; 33 Am.Jur. … With regard to qualified, or conditional privilege, it is said in 53 C.J.S.

Riley v. Carter

165 Okla. 262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1933

Carter is the duly elected, qualified, and acting State Auditor, and that the respondent Ray O. … Weems is the duly elected, qualified, and acting State Treasurer; that for the month of July, 1933, he presented to the respondent E. C.

Ward v. State

15 Okla. Crim. 150 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1918

This character of testimony was clearly error],' first, because it was hearsay; second, because there was no sufficient predicate laid.” … such place, if such a place be one resorted to by the public for that purpose, is established in the former opinions of this court.

Sooner State News Agency, Inc. v. Fallis

367 F. Supp. 523 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1973

We do not, however, feel that the plaintiffs have established such a claim here. … “No citizen or member of the community is immune from prosecution, in good faith, for his alleged criminal acts.

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 2003

Clearly, except for special provisions in Article IX of the Oklahoma Constitution, 12 the Legislature is without power to amend the Constitution. … by reason of the failure to continue to qualify.

Parrott v. State

522 P.2d 628 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1974

Warthen further testified that the defendant had asked him if Ed West and Dean Plank were qualified to lift fingerprints, and also stated that he (the defendant) did not think they were qualified and not being qualified they … This Court notes that the burden of establishing that the prospective jurors’ statements were prejudicial to his rights is placed upon the defendant. Rooks v. State, Okl.Cr., 417 P.2d 939 (1966).

Shorter v. Tulsa Used Equipment & Industrial Engine Services

148 P.3d 864 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 2006

This analysis was clearly in error. … Today’s cause clearly deals with two separate entities. . Dominic, supra note 21 . . For the text of § 65.2 see supra note 1. .

Arndt v. Hatfield

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 20, 2020

A complaint must clearly state what each defendant--typically, a named government employee--did to violate Plaintiff’s civil rights. See Bennett v. … App’x 723, 725 (10th Cir. 2013) (“the [state court] judge, court clerks, and prosecutor are all entitled to absolute immunity under well-established precedent from the Supreme Court and this court”) (citing Harlow v.

Hill v. Oklahoma Medical Marijuana Authority

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 3, 2025

And in her Response, Plaintiff simply argues that her claims “implicate discriminatory treatment, which qualifies as protected opposition under Title VII.” Resp. at 5. Her conclusory argument does not suffice. … sovereign immunity from liability”); Bright v.