Case law

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Brown

623 A.2d 1268 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 20, 1993

Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Dineen, 500 A.2d 262, 264 (Me.1985). There must be competent evidence in the record, however, to support a factual finding. See Harmon v. Emerson, 425 A.2d 978, 981 (Me.1981). … Ricker v. United States, 417 F.Supp. 133, 140 (D.Me.1976); 33 M.R.S.A. § 161 (1988).

Mayor of Baltimore v. Borinsky

239 Md. 611 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 2, 1965

See Irvine v. Montgomery Co., 239 Md. 113 , 210 A. 2d 359 (1965) and Board of Co. Comm. v. Kines, 239 Md. 119 , 210 A. 2d 367 (1965). The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied. We turn to the merits. … Pallace v. Inter City Land Co., 239 Md. 549 , 212 A. 2d 262 ; DePaul v. Board, 237 Md. 221, 227-29, 205 A. 2d 805 (1965) and cases therein cited.

Davis v. State

905 S.W.2d 655 · Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · Nov 8, 1995

Brown, 460 U.S. at 742 , 103 S.Ct. at 1543 . … Applying this reasoning to the specific facts in Brown , the Supreme Court found that the officer possessed probable cause to believe that an opaque balloon in Brown’s possession contained an illicit substance.

Brown v. Brown

19 N.C. App. 393 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 12, 1973

Heroux v. Ingrassio

612 F. Supp. 2d 236 · District Court, W.D. New York · May 6, 2009

The Workers’ Compensation Board’s findings were affirmed by a Memorandum of Board Panel Decision on September 26, 2008. Id. … Any Workers’ Compensation Board determination must be given res judicata effect by this court where, as here, the findings by the Board are made in adjudicatory proceedings and “where the board makes discrete findings of

Brown v. Brown

730 So. 2d 406 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 9, 1999

Brown appeals a final judgment of dissolution. The clerk was not authorized to enter the default. … . *407 In Turner v.

Brown v. Brown

2 Va. Dec. 308 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Feb 13, 1896

Brown, and said Jos. H. Brown, defendant, consent that said Exhibit B and said certificate signed by Joh. … Bailey v. Bailey, 21 Grat. 57 ; Miller v. Miller (Va.) 23 S. E. 232 . This assignment of error is wholly without merit. Second.

Brown v. Brown

255 A.D.2d 209 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 19, 1998

To the extent there may be any conflict between the judgment and the parties’ earlier oral stipulation of settlement, the judgment governs (see, Rainbow v Swisher, 72 NY2d 106, 110 ). Concur — Sullivan, J.

Brown v. Brown

14 Me. 317 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1837

R. 122 , and Whiting v. Smith, 13 Pick. 364 . There are, however, opposing authorities; and the principle upon which these cases rest, has not been adopted by any judicial decision in this State. … Holt v. Scholefield, 6 T. R. 691; Hawkes v. Hawkey, 8 East, 427. It is true, it is stated in the declaration, by way of inuendo, that the defendant meant to charge the plaintiff with the crime of stealing.

Brown v. Brown.

6 N.C. 350 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1818

If wc were informed by the records of the County Court of Wilkes that the nuncupative will of James Brown had been proved in Court, and we should *351 be furnished with a copy of it properly authenticated, I think we would … It does not appear that James Brown specially required cither of the witnesses to bear witness to what lie was saying $ the words he uttered were drawn from him by the person whose interest it is to establish them as a will

Brown v. Brown

561 S.W.2d 374 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1977

E.g., Clinton v. Clinton, 444 S.W.2d 677, 681 (Mo.App. 1969), citing Whitledge v. Anderson Air Activities, 276 S.W.2d 114, 116 (Mo.1955). … Co. v. Jones, 396 S.W.2d 601, 603 (Mo. banc 1965).

Brown v. Brown

68 Wash. App. 1015 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Dec 21, 1992

Brown v. Brown

70 N.Y.2d 763 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1987

Brown v. Brown

63 N.J. Eq. 348 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Nov 15, 1901

In Berckmans v. Berckmans, 1 C. E. … Berckmans v. Berckmans, 2 C. E. Gr. 453.

Brown v. Brown

187 Tenn. 617 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1948

members of the County Board of Education by the Quarterly County Court of Bledsoe County; to fix the term of office of such officers, their qualifications, duties and compensation.” … Bell v. Hart, 143 Tenn. 587 , 223 S. W. 996 . (Emphasis ours.) In Davis v. Hailey, 143 Tenn. 247, 252 , 227 S.

DeAngelo v. Stroud Township Zoning Hearing Board

41 Pa. D. & C.5th 107 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County · Sep 11, 2014

Bray v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 410 A.2d 909, 911 (1980). … Manor Healthcare *112 Corp. v. Lower Moreland Township Zoning Hearing Board, 590 A.2d 206 , 215 (1991).

Brown v. Brown

83 Ohio St. 3d 1450 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1998

Brown v. Brown

15 Ohio Law. Abs. 316 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1933

West v West, 100 Oh St, 33, is decisive against the claim of the plaintiff herein. This case went to the Supreme Court from this court.

Brown v. Brown

260 A.2d 675 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1970

Brown’s children. … Brown filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that his wife, having accepted the alimony payments, is estop-ped from appealing. Stein v. Stein, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 286 , 170 F.2d 162 (1948); Harris v.

Brown v. Brown

453 So. 2d 149 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Jul 18, 1984

As stated in our original opinion, Brown v. … Delehant v. Delehant, 409 So.2d 213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Dash v. Dash, 306 So.2d 543 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); and see generally Courts and Judges, 13 Fla.Jur.2d, Section 230, page 356.