Case law

Brown v. Lannert

272 A.D.2d 323 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 1, 2000

Rutkoske, 251 AD2d 584 ; Matter of Magwood v Glass, 240 AD2d 409 ; Matter of Duso v Kralik, 216 AD2d 297 ; Matter of Reape v Gunn, 154 AD2d 682 ). … Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176 ).

Brown v. Perlow

185 A.D.2d 966 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 31, 1992

We conclude that the testimony by the plaintiffs process server, which was credited by the hearing court, was sufficient to establish that the defendant was properly served with process (see, Rowlan v Brooklyn Jewish Hosp … This case is distinguishable from Kaszovitz v Weiszman ( 110 AD2d 117 ), wherein the plaintiff relied exclusively on her process server’s affidavit of service, insufficient on its face to sustain service.

People v. Brown

105 A.D.2d 509 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 18, 1984

In addition, no extraordinary circumstances evincing an abuse of discretion have been demonstrated which would warrant our interference with the sentence imposed (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305 ; People v Miller, 74 AD2d … This court has recently concluded that section 60.35 of the Penal Law was a constitutionally permissible enactment by the Legislature (Pe ople v Dodson, 96 AD2d 1116, 1118 ). Judgment affirmed. Kane, J.

Meegan v. Brown

83 A.D.3d 1603 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 2011

People v. Brown

187 A.D.2d 723 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 30, 1992

prosecutor’s remarks regarding the credibility of the police officers and the defendant’s testimony constituted a fair response to the defense counsel’s characterization of the People’s case and was therefore proper (see, People v … Atson, 139 AD2d 520 ; People v Street, 124 AD2d 841 ).

Brown v. Hoffman

167 A.D. 897 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1915

People v. Brown

81 A.D.3d 1305 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 10, 2011

v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). … Whitfield, 72 AD3d 1610 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 811 [2010]; see generally People v Guidice, 83 NY2d 630, 636 [1994]).

Gress v. Brown

86 A.D.3d 933 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 2011

People v. Brown

87 A.D.3d 1414 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 30, 2011

Meegan v. Brown

87 A.D.3d 1415 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 30, 2011

People v. Brown

103 A.D.3d 912 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 27, 2013

v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). … of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (see People v Ames, 96 AD3d 867, 868 [2012]; People v Lupo, 92 AD3d 1136, 1137-1138 [2012]; People v Stewart, 60 AD3d 1111, 1112-1113 [2009]; People v Nowinski, 36 AD3d

Chinnici v. Brown

295 A.D.2d 465 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 17, 2002

New York, 284 AD2d 296, 297 ; Pierre v Nanton, 279 AD2d 621 ; Descovich v Blieka, 279 AD2d 499, 500 ; Sainte-Aime v Ho, 274 AD2d 569, 570 ). … Henry, 276 AD2d 611, 612 ; Lalli v Tamasi, 266 AD2d 266 ; Letellier v Walker, supra).

Brown v. Teel

13 N.Y.S. 142 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1891

Elisha Brown, now dead, .on the 18th of December, 1875, entered into an agreement, under hand and seal, with his son, the plaintiff. … The case of Austin v. Goodrich, 49 N. Y. 266 , is directly in point.

People v. Brown

145 A.D.2d 301 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 1, 1988

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, as we must (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that the proof demonstrated no more than a purely subjective claim of pain, which is legally insufficient … Such evidence provides too scant a basis upon which to predicate a finding of substantial pain or physical impairment (see, e.g., People v Hargrove, 95 AD2d 864 ), and we modify accordingly.

O'Donnell v. Brown

3 Lans. 474 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1871

Lee v. Brown

6 Johns. 132 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1810

Meegan v. Brown

85 A.D.3d 1579 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 10, 2011

People v. Brown

17 N.Y.3d 708 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 13, 2011

17 N.Y.3d 708 (2011) 954 N.E.2d 1178 930 N.Y.S.2d 552 PEOPLE v. BROWN. Motion No: 2011-727 Court of Appeals of New York. September 13, 2011.

People v. Brown

26 A.D.3d 340 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2006

The defendant’s challenge to his sentence is precluded from review by his valid waiver of appeal (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; People v Iorio, 276 AD2d 564 [2000 … [1990]; People v Manzullo, 14 AD3d 717 [2005]).

Black v. Brown

27 A.D.2d 683 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 9, 1967