Case law

Jones v. . Board of Education

187 N.C. 557 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1924

Perry v. Comrs., 183 N. C., 387 . It is also clear, we think, that it cannot be upheld under section 5530. … Paschal v. Johnson, 183 N. C., 129 ; Perry v. Comrs., supra; Hicks v. Comrs., 183 N. C., 394 . What bearing, then, has- tbe act of 1921 on tbe consolidation of these districts?

Brown v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

147 N.C. 136 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 18, 1908

testimony admitted by his Honor is not the declaration of the injured party, made post litem motam, offered in evidence through the medium of .another witness, and generally held to be inadmissible. 3 Wigmore, 1722; Chapin v. … Wallace v. Railroad, 104 N. C., 449 ; Ruffin v. Railroad, 142 N. C., 129 . No Error.

Wiggins v. . Board of Education

198 N.C. 301 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 12, 1930

For instance, the legal title to school property must be vested in the board, 'and the building qf new schoolhouses and the repairing of an old sehoolhouse is under the control of the board of education. … Indeed, under certain conditions, the board can actually sell the school property and deliver a good title to the purchaser.

Herring v. Wake County Board

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 22, 2000

Hinson v. Board of Commissioners

218 N.C. 13 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 19, 1940

of Education may create a school district and define the boundaries thereof; and that upon a further petition by the County Board of Education the Board of County Commissioners shall order a special election to be held in … The statute is similar to that discussed in Fletcher v. Comrs. of Buncombe, ante , 1, and there is no necessity for a further discussion of the principles involved.

Brown v. L. H. Bottoms Truck Lines, Inc.

227 N.C. 65 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 11, 1946

Lee v. Adjustment Board, 226 N. C., 107 , 37 S. E. (2d), *66 128. An exception to the signing of the judgment presents only the question whether error appears on the face of the record. King v. Rudd, 226 N. … E. (2d), 116 ; Crissman v. Palmer, 225 N. C., 472 , 35 S. E. (2d), 422 ; Query v. Ins. Co., 218 N. C., 386 , 11 S. E. (2d), 139 . In Rader v. Coach Co., 225 N. C., 537 , 35 S.

Lazenby v. Board of Commissioners

186 N.C. 548 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1923

It was held in Gill v. Comrs., 160 N. … See, also, Key v. Board of Education, 170 N. C., 123 .

Brown v. N.C. Div. of Motor Vehicles

357 N.C. 62 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 27, 2003

Board of Transportation v. Revis

40 N.C. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 6, 1979

App. 207 , 164 S.E. 2d 385 (1968); Highway Commission v. Coggins, 262 N.C. 25 , 136 S.E. 2d 265 (1964); Redevelopment Commission of Winston-Salem v. … Hinkle, 260 N.C. 423 , 132 S.E. 2d 761 (1963); State Highway and Public Works Commission v. Hartley, 218 N.C. 438 , 11 S.E. 2d 314 (1940); Palmer v.

Zimmerman v. . Board of Education

199 N.C. 259 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 20, 1930

schools (see Posey v. … Posey v. Board of Education, supra. Said fund was also sufficient to support the junior college. No additional tax was required to provide funds for the support of said public school system, or any part of it.

Chambers v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

250 N.C. 194 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1959

Harden v. Raleigh, 192 N.C. 395 , 135 S.E. 151 ; Kinney v. Sutton, 230 N.C. 404 , 53 S.E. 2d 306 . … Russ v.

Faires v. State Board of Elections

368 N.C. 825 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 2016

See, e.g., State v. Long, 365 N.C. 5 , 705 S.E.2d 735 (2011) (per curiam); State v. Greene, 298 N.C. 268 , 258 S.E.2d 71 (1979) (per curiam). AFFIRMED.

Board of Education v. Seagle

342 N.C. 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 8, 1996

Scott v. Board of Commissioners

170 N.C. 327 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 8, 1915

, or lay out and establish a new public road, whenever such location, change, etc., shall be considered necessary and advantageous to public travel, etc., but before doing so he is required to file a petition before the board … Jones v. Lassiter, 169 N. C., 750 ; Little v. Lenoir, 151 N. C., 415 ; Griffin v. R. R., 150 N. C., 312 ; Durham v. Cotton Mills, 141 N. C., 615 ; Vickers v. Durham, 132 N. C., 880 ; Dorsey v. Allen, 85 N. C., 358 .

Rowland v. . Board of Elections

184 N.C. 78 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1922

No power of review, or other judicial authority, in primary elections, has been lodged in the county boards of elections. This question was discussed by Hoke, J. , in Brown v. … Moore v. Jones , 76 N.C. 182 .

Griffin v. BOARD OF COM'RS

319 N.C. 672 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 2, 1987

GRIFFIN v. The BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF the LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS' BENEFIT AND RETIREMENT FUND. No. 143P87. Supreme Court of North Carolina. June 2, 1987.

Craver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

267 N.C. 40 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 13, 1966

For support they rely on this Court’s decision in Jarrell v. Board of Adjustment, 258 N.C. 476 , 128 S.E. 2d 879 . … The petitioners, having invoked the jurisdiction of the Board, are not in a position to challenge that jurisdiction. Convent v. Winston-Salem, 243 N.C. 316 , 90 S.E. 2d 879 .

Mangum v. Raleigh Board of Adjustment

187 N.C. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2007

Thus, a petitioner will have standing to seek review of the decision of a Board of Adjustment if the petitioner is an “aggrieved party” within the meaning of the statute. See Heery v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C. … Kentallen, Inc. v. Town of Hillsborough, 110 N.C.

Board of Transportation v. Pierce

301 N.C. 527 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 2, 1980

Board of Transportation v. Annas

298 N.C. 293 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 10, 1979