Case law

Lessard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

618 F. Supp. 1268 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 1985

In Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. … See, e.g., Delisi v. United Parcel Service, 580 F.Supp. 1572 (D.Pa.1984); Brown v. Retirement Committee of Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, 575 F.Supp. 1073 (E.D.Wis.1983).

State v. Maine State Employees Ass'n

499 A.2d 1228 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 29, 1985

In State v. MLRB, 413 A.2d 510 (Me.1980), we affirmed the Board’s order to negotiate the impact of holiday openings of liquor stores. … The court reversed the NLRB, distinguishing such cases as General Electric Co. v. NLRB, 414 F.2d 918 (4th Cir.1969) and Timken Roller Bearing Co. v.

William A. Horton v. Town of Casco

82 A.3d 1217 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 19, 2013

Therefore, we review the decision of the Planning Board as the operative decision. See Mills v. … Town of Union v.

State v. Garland

445 A.2d 1021 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 3, 1982

See State v. Thibodeau, Me., 317 A.2d 172, 177-78 (1974). The validity of Patricia Call’s consent rests upon a factual finding of vol-untariness. State v. Carter, Me., 443 A.2d 958, 959 (1982). … See State v. Curtis, Me., 399 A.2d 1330 , 1333 n.4 (1979); State v. Hazelton, Me., 330 A.2d 919, 921 (1975).

Morison v. Wilson Lake Country Club

874 A.2d 885 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 2005

Austin v. Austin, 2000 ME 61, ¶8 , 748 A.2d 996, 1000 . … [which] govern their mutual rights and responsibilities.’ ” Gashgai v. Me. Med. Ass’n, 850 A.2d 571, 575 (Me.1976) (quoting Libby v. Perry, 311 A.2d 527, 532 (Me.1973)).

Forbis v. City of Portland

270 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 30, 2003

Dec. at 42 (quoting Hayden v. Grayson, 134 F.3d 449, 456 (1st Cir.1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). Canton v. … Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997), not a failure to train case, elaborated further on what might be enough.

Rodway v. Wiswall

267 A.2d 374 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 29, 1970

The plaintiff relies in part on the case of Shellburne, Inc. v. Roberts (Del.1968) 238 A.2d 331 . Shellburne is distinguished upon its facts. … The Court noted that the federal rule provides “complete immunity to executive officers acting within the scope of their authority,” citing Barr v.

Miller v. CPM CONSTRUCTORS

935 A.2d 668 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 27, 2007

Miller v. State of Maine Workers’ Compensation Board, AP-06-78 (Me.Super.Ct., Ken.Cty., Jan. 8, 2007) (Studstrup, J.). II. LEGAL ANALYSIS [¶ 6] Title 39-A M.R.S. § 360 provides, in relevant part: 2. General authority. … See In re Walter R., 2004 ME 151, ¶ 3 , 863 A.2d 276, 277 ; Sevigny v.

LaPointe v. United Engineers & Constructors

680 A.2d 458 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 1, 1996

LaPointe contends that the Board’s interpretation of the Commission decision is the only permissible interpretation, citing Kennedy v. Brunswick Convalescent Ctr., 584 A.2d 678, 680 (Me.1991), and Harding v. Sheridan D. … Bouford v.

Fernald v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.

946 A.2d 395 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 8, 2008

We have noted that decisions of the Board interpreting the Workers’ Compensation Act are entitled to great deference and will be upheld on appeal unless the statute plainly compels a different result. Jordan v. … McAdam v. United Parcel Serv., 2001 ME 4, ¶ 34 , 763 A.2d 1173, 1182 . B.

City of Lewiston v. Salvation Army

710 A.2d 914 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 4, 1998

The factual findings of the Board stand “unless the findings are clearly erroneous because they are not supported by competent evidence in the record.” Town of Poland v. … The City relies heavily on our decision in City of Lewiston v.

Lavoie v. Gervais

713 A.2d 335 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 30, 1998

In Baker v. … Co. v.

Saucier v. Nichols Portland Div.

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 27, 2007

The Workers' Compensation Board decree on which this Court's Pro Forma Decree was based was vacated by the Law Court in its opinion Saucier v. Nichols, 2007 ME 132, 932 A.2d 1178. … Weiss v.

Gatchell v. Gatchell

127 Me. 328 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 25, 1928

Brown v. Brown, 66 Maine, 316. Whenever, by acts or words, or both acts and words, the grantor so *331 assents to the possession of the deed, then, and not until then, is delivery of the deed complete. … Golder v. Golder, 95 Maine, 259; McCarthy v. Welsh, 123 Maine, 157, 161.

Quiland, Inc. v. Wells Sanitary District

2006 Me. 113 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 12, 2006

Peregrine Developers, LLC v. Town of Orono, 2004 ME 95, ¶ 9 , 854 A.2d 216, 219 . … See Kroeger v. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot., 2005 ME 50, ¶ 8 , 870 A.2d 566, 569 ; Phaiah v. Town of Fayette, 2005 ME 20, ¶ 9 , 866 A.2d 863, 866 .

Ducharme v. City of Biddeford

110 Me. 6 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1912

Andrews v. Portland, 79 Maine, 484; Dolliver v. Parks, 136 Mass., 499 ; Phelon v. Granville, 140 Mass., 386 . … In Cote v. Biddeford, 96 Maine, 491, the court in re-affirming the doctrine of Andrews v.

State v. Lamos

26 Me. 258 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1846

The power given by the section referred to, to the board, is important, and its exercise may materially affect the interests of those against whom complaints may be made. … Crosby v.

Mitchell v. City of Rockland

41 Me. 363 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

Thayer v. Boston, 19 Pick. 511 . … The restriction against the coming on shore of persons on board of vessels, arriving in port, is applied to vessels having on board other contagious sickness than that of the plague.

Credit Counseling Centers, Inc. v. City of South Portland

814 A.2d 458 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 10, 2003

(quoting Holbrook Island Sanctuary v. … Co. v. Town of Dexter, 588 A.2d 289, 292 (Me.1991) (citing Berry v. Daigle, 322 A.2d 320, 324 (Me.1974).) .

Keith v. Saco River Corridor Commission

464 A.2d 150 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1983

Johnny Cake, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 180 Conn. 296 , 429 A.2d 883, 885 (1980); Petruzzi v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 176 Conn. 479 , 408 A.2d 243, 246 (1979); People v. … But see Schneider v. Board of Appeals, 402 Ill. 536 , 84 N.E.2d 428 (1949); Keller v. City of Bellingham, 92 Wash.2d 726 , 600 P.2d 1276 (1979).