Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

3.67s

  • Board of Ed. of Memphis City Schools v. Shelby County

    339 S.W.2d 569 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1960

    339 S.W.2d 569 (1960) BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the MEMPHIS CITY SCHOOLS v. SHELBY COUNTY, Tennessee, et al. CITY OF MEMPHIS v. SHELBY COUNTY, Tennessee, et al. Supreme Court of Tennessee. June 6, 1960. … Browning, 192 Tenn. 597 , 241 S.W.2d 583 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Allen E. Cole v. Tennessee Board of Paroles

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 6, 1996

    If the agency or board has reached its decision in a constitutional or lawful manner, then the decision would not be subject to judicial review. Powell v. … Randolph v. Dominion Bank of Middle Tenn., 826 S.W.2d 477, 478 (Tenn. App. 1991) (citing Huckeby v. Spangler, 521 S.W.2d 568, 571 (Tenn. 1975)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 6, 2019

    Howard v. … See Pola v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Michael A. Thompson v. Tennessee Board of Paroles

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 5, 1998

    Whether the decision rendered in Howell v. … On December 23, 1996, the Board denied the application, and, on January 17, 1997, appellant appealed to the Board on the ground that the hearing officer erred in considering his aggregate sentence of thirty-two and one-half

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • George Peabody College for Teachers v. State Board of Equalization

    219 Tenn. 123 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1966

    An excellent review of the legislative acts preceding what is now T.C.A. see. 67-502(2) is set forth in City of Nashville v. State Board of Equalization, supra. … It is further pointed out that the opinion in City of Nashville v. State Board of Equali *129 zation, supra, in nowise dilutes the rule of liberal interpretation.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Southland Mall, Incorporated v. Garner

    293 F. Supp. 1370 · District Court, W.D. Tennessee · Oct 3, 1968

    MEMORANDUM DECISION BAILEY BROWN, Chief Judge. … Ry. v. Browning, 310 U.S. 362 , 60 S.Ct. 968 , 84 L.Ed. 1254 (1940).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Pamela Dallas v. Shelby County Board of Education

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 19, 2019

    See Snell v. … See generally Keen v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Tennessean v. Electric Power Board of Nashville

    Tennessee Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1998

    In Seaton v. Johnson, 898 S.W.2d 232 (Tenn. … P olice P rac., Etc. v . Cra ig, 153 Cal. Rptr. 173, 178 (Cal. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Youth Programs, Inc. v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization

    170 S.W.3d 92 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 14, 2004

    The State relies heavily on City of Nashville v. State Board of Equalization, 360 S.W.2d 458 (Tenn. 1962), Mid-State Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. … Book Agents of Methodist Episcopal Church v. State Board of Equalization, 513 S.W .2d 514 at 522 (Tenn.1974).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vanderford, Michael v. E.S. Dockery Company

    2025 TN WC App. 60 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 5, 2025

    Brown’s report. She testified that she only told Mr. Brown about Decedent’s headaches but did not suggest he had complained of dizziness or chest tightness. Mr. … Citing Atkins v. Employer’s Mut. Ins.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hoover Inc. v. Metro Board of Zoning Appeals

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 5, 1995

    In support of this conclusion, the court cited, with approval, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Bierman, 50 A.2d 804 (Md. 1947) and Sokolis v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Springfield, 157 N.E.2d 427 (Ill. App. … Roger's Group, Inc. v. County of Franklin, No. 01A01-9110-CH-00378, 1992 WL 8505, at *5 (Tenn. App. 1992); see Father Ryan High School, Inc. v. City of Oak Hill, 774 S.W.2d 184, 191 (Tenn. App. 1988); Merritt v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • General American Transportation Corp. v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization

    536 S.W.2d 212 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1976

    In the recent case of Apache County v. … Smith v. Cahoon, 283 U.S. 553 , 51 S.Ct. 582 , 75 L.Ed. 1264 (1931); Frost v. Railroad Comm’n, 271 U.S. 583 , 46 S.Ct. 605 , 70 L.Ed. 1101 (1926); Mich. Pub. Utilities Comm’n v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dominique Johnson v. South Central Correctional Facility Disciplinary Board

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 6, 2013

    (“SCCF Board”); Sergeant Lang, SCCF Board Chairman; Counselor Ms. … Robinson, SCCF Board Member; Jane Doe Nurse, SCCF Board Member; Tennessee Department of Correction Official Carolyn Jordan, SCCF Board Member; Arvil Chapman,1 SCCF Warden; Jason Woodall, Assistant Commissioner of Operations

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reginald Tutton v. Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 18, 2013

    If the agency or board has reached its decision in a constitutional or lawful manner, then the decision would not be subject to judicial review. Brown v. Little, 341 S.W.3d 275, 279 (Tenn. Ct. … York v. Tennessee Bd. of Probation and Parole, 2007 WL 1541360 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 25, 2007).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allen B. Cole v. Tennessee Board of Paroles

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 6, 1996

    Hixson v. Stickley, 493 S.W.2d 471, 473 (Tenn. 1973); Pacific Eastern Corp. v. Gulf Life Holding Co., 902 S.W.2d 946, 952 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). … Neal v. Kelly, 963 F.2d 453, 456 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kevin Ryan Mosley v. Tennessee Board of Paroles

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 1, 1996

    However we have previously held that the Board of Paroles is not totally immune from judicial scrutiny. See Powell v. … Wright v. Trammel, 810 F.2d 589 (6th Cir. 1987), Wells v. Board of Paroles, 909 S.W.2d 826 (Tenn. App. 1995).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tennessee Sports Complex, Inc. v. Lenoir City Beer Board

    106 S.W.3d 33 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 8, 2003

    The review of the Beer Board decision is de novo. McCarter v. … Thompson v. City of Harriman, 568 S.W.2d 92 (Tenn.1978); Richards v. Lewisburg Alcoholic Beverage Comm’n, 543 S.W.2d 852 (Tenn.1977).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Board of Educational Com'rs v. O'Brien

    170 Tenn. 435 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1936

    To the same effect, see State ex rel. v. Houston, 40 La. Ann. 393 , 4 So., 50 , 8 Am. St. Rep., 532 ; State ex rel. v. Associated Press, 159 Mo., 410 , 60 S. W., 91 , 51 L. R. A., 151, 81 Am. St. … Rep., 368 ; State ex rel. v. District Board, 162 Wis., 482 , 156 N. W., 477 , L. R. A., 1916D, 399, Ann. Cas., 1918C, 584.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Earl L. Fox v. Tennessee Board of Paroles

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 17, 1995

    A common-law writ of certiorari provides a vehicle for reviewing the parole board’s decisions. Powell v. Parole Eligibility Review Bd., 879 S.W.2d 871, 872- 73 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994); Brigham v. … Fox’s response to the parole board’s motion demonstrates that his petition rests on the holding in Mayes v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Henry v. Bi-District Board of Urban Ministry, Inc.

    54 S.W.3d 287 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 23, 2001

    See Byrd v. Hall, 847 S.W.2d 208 (Tenn.1993). … McCall v. Wilder, 913 S.W.2d 150,153 (Tenn.1985).

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.