Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

1.17s

  • Johnson v. Board of Commissioners

    192 N.C. 561 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1926

    C., 52 ; Lassiter v. Comrs., 188 N. C., 379 . … Edwards v. Goldsboro, 141 N. C., 60 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Greer v. Board of Commissioners

    192 N.C. 714 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1926

    Miller v. Groome, 109 N. C., 148 ; Dumas v. Morrison, 175 N. C., 431 ; Caldwell v. Robinson, 179 N. C., 518 ; Hardy v. Thornton, ante, 296. … In Davis v. Davis, 184 N.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Garrett v. Board of Commissioners

    74 N.C. 388 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 5, 1876

    See Spelman v. Roanoke Navigation Company. at this term. There is no error. Judgment here for plaintiff. Pww. Cukiam. Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. . Burgin

    206 N.C. 421 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 2, 1934

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kings Mountain Board of Education v. North Carolina State Board of Education

    159 N.C. App. 568 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2003

    See Moore v. Board of Education, 212 N.C. 499, 502 , 193 S.E. 732, 733-34 (1937); McCormac v. Commissioners, 90 N.C. 441, 444-45 (1884). … See Burrow v. Board of Education, 61 N.C. App. 619, 627 , 301 S.E.2d 704, 708 (1983).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Doe on Demise of Bryan v. Brown

    6 N.C. 343 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 5, 1818

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Farr v. Board of Adjustment

    315 N.C. 309 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 10, 1985

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Swisher v. Board of Adjust.

    356 N.C. 694 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 27, 2003

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Trayford v. North Carolina Psychology Board

    627 S.E.2d 462 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 2006

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN TRUST CO. NA v. Benson

    684 S.E.2d 692 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 2009

    684 S.E.2d 692 (2009) BROWN BROTHERS HARRIMAN TRUST CO. N.A., as Trustee of the Benson Trust v. Anne P. BENSON, as Grantor of the Benson Trust; John H. Benson, as Beneficiary under the Benson Trust; Anne H. … Kohut, Charlotte, for Brown Brothers Harriman Trust. Edward G. Connette, III, Charlotte, for Ruth Pringle Pipkin Franklin. James E. Creamer, Jr., Winston-Salem, for Unborn Heirs.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bear v. Board of County Commissioners

    122 N.C. 434 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 5, 1898

    There seems to be no ground for the contention that the board of commissioners are not concluded. Are the tax-payers concluded by the action of their legal representative ? … Freeman on Judgments, Section 178; Black on Judgments, Section 583; State v. Rainey, 74 Mo., 229 ; Clark v. Wolf, 29 Iowa, 197 ; Harmon v. Auditor, 123 Ill., *437 122; City of Cairo v. Campbell, 116 Ill., 305 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Davis v. County Board of Education

    186 N.C. 227 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1923

    L. 1919, ch. 322; Jenkins v. Board of Elections, 180 N. C., 169 ; S. v. Jackson, 183 N. C., 695 . … Newsome v. Earnheart, supra; DeBerry v. Nicholson, supra; Roberts v. Calvert, 98 N. C., 581 ; Hampton v. Waldrop, 104 N. C., 453 ; Quinn v. Lattimore, 120 N. C., 426 ; Hendersonville v. Jordan, 150 N. C., 35 ; Gibson v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Faires v. State Board of Elections

    368 N.C. 825 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 6, 2016

    See, e.g., State v. Long, 365 N.C. 5 , 705 S.E.2d 735 (2011) (per curiam); State v. Greene, 298 N.C. 268 , 258 S.E.2d 71 (1979) (per curiam). AFFIRMED.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • North Carolina Board of Examiners v. North Carolina State Board of Education

    345 N.C. 493 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 10, 1997

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Pickler v. County Board of Education

    149 N.C. 221 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1908

    The building needing repairs, an effort was made to induce the defendant Board to remove the site and búild a new school house at another point a mile away. … Smith v. School Trustees, 141 N. C., 160 . It does not appear whether the other school house, “nearer than three miles,” was erected before, or since, this was erected at Cherry Hill 50 or 60 years ago.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Wiggins v. . Board of Education

    198 N.C. 301 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 12, 1930

    For instance, the legal title to school property must be vested in the board, 'and the building qf new schoolhouses and the repairing of an old sehoolhouse is under the control of the board of education. … Indeed, under certain conditions, the board can actually sell the school property and deliver a good title to the purchaser.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lautenschlager v. Board of Transportation

    25 N.C. App. 228 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 19, 1975

    . *229 G.S. 136-108 expressly provides that when the Board of Transportation institutes a condemnation action the judge shall hear and determine all issues raised by the pleadings other than the issue of damages. … Here the Board did not institute the action or file a declaration of taking.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jones v. County Board of Education

    185 N.C. 303 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 11, 1923

    Bennett v. Comrs., supra; Comrs. v. Webb, 148 N. C., 120 ; McCless v. Meekins, 117 N. C., 34 ; Tucker v. Raleigh, 75 N. C., 267 ; Parvin v. Comrs., 177 N. C., 508 ; Riddle v. Cumberland, 180 N. … The special purpose of the tax is to erect buildings and maintain schools within the taxing district and these things are to be accomplished through the agency of the county board of education. Faison v. Comrs., 171 N.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Jones v. . Board of Education

    187 N.C. 557 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1924

    Perry v. Comrs., 183 N. C., 387 . It is also clear, we think, that it cannot be upheld under section 5530. … Paschal v. Johnson, 183 N. C., 129 ; Perry v. Comrs., supra; Hicks v. Comrs., 183 N. C., 394 . What bearing, then, has- tbe act of 1921 on tbe consolidation of these districts?

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Transportation v. Chewning

    50 N.C. App. 670 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 17, 1981

    Power Co. v. Winebarger, 300 N.C. 57 , 265 S.E. 2d 227 (1980). … Power Co. v. Winebarger, supra; State v. Johnson, 282 N.C. 1 , 191 S.E. 2d 641 (1972); Templeton v. Highway Commission, 254 N.C. 337 , 118 S.E. 2d 918 (1961); Barnes v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.