Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

1.13s

  • Mitchell v. City of Rockland

    52 Me. 118 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1860

    The acts complained of were the negligent and careless acts of Sweetland, who was in the employ of the board of health of the defendant city. … The general views on this subject, already stated, have been recently considered and deliberately affirmed in this State, in Brown v. South Kennebec Agricultural Society, 47 Maine, 275.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State of Maine v. Douglas E. Wilcox

    288 A.3d 1200 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 26, 2023

    State v. Brown, 675 A.2d 504, 505 (Me. 1996) (quotation marks omitted). An anonymous tip can form the basis of a reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity. See State v. … Specifically, the caller indicated that a brown Honda car had collided with an object, that the car was now at a specific convenience store, and that the caller thought the driver was intoxicated. Cf. Florida v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Tapper v. Warren

    129 Me. 481 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 26, 1930

    Brown v. Gammon, 14 Me., 276; Appleton v. Chase, 19 Me., 74; Brown v. Davis, 138 Mass., 460 ; Warren v. Wheeler, 21 Me., 484, 490. Motion overruled. Leroy Haley, White & Willey, for plaintiff. F.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Hill

    464 A.2d 938 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 26, 1983

    Doctors Brown and Chamberlain assisted with the surgery. During the appendectomy, Dr. Hill observed a growth on Mrs. Taylor’s right ovary. … Friedman was a general surgeon and a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Town of Ogunquit v. Cliff House & Motels, Inc.

    759 A.2d 731 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 5, 2000

    Town of North Berwick v. … Goumas, 2000 ME 79, ¶ 7 , 750 A.2d at 565 (quoting Brown v. Osier, 628 A.2d 125, 127 (Me.1993)).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Oeste v. Town of Camden

    534 A.2d 683 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 22, 1987

    Ray v. Town of Camden, 533 A.2d 912 (Me.1987); see Spain v. City of Brewer, 474 A.2d 496, 499 (Me.1984); Cope v. Town of Brunswick, 464 A.2d 223, 225 (Me.1988). … Article V, Section I of the Camden Zoning Ordinance provides, in part: Section 1.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Sirois v. Town of Frenchville

    441 A.2d 291 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 12, 1982

    See Prest v. Inhabitants of the Town of Farmington, 116 Me. 8, 11 , 99 A. 653 (1917); Inhabitants of Richmond v. Johnson, 53 Me. 437, 438 (1866). … See Chapman v. Bomann, Me., 381 A.2d 1123, 1127 (1978).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Laskey v. SD Warren Company

    774 A.2d 358 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 11, 2001

    Warren also suggests that because the employee’s partial benefits are based on an average weekly wage that has been adjusted for inflation in a manner differing from our recent decision in Bernard v. … See Longtin v. City of Lewiston, 1998 ME 90 , ¶ 5 n. 3, 710 A.2d 901 , 903 n. 3. The entry is: The decision of the Hearing Officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board is affirmed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Heron v. Webber

    103 Me. 178 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 16, 1907

    If it has the narrower meaning, it is usually designated table board. … LaFontain v. Hayhurst, 89 Maine, 388; Clary v. Clary, 93 Maine, 220. Express contracts of a similar nature should be as closely scrutinized.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Clary v. Clary

    93 Me. 220 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 16, 1899

    I never at any time agreed with him that he should not pay board. Nothing was said between Mr. Clary and me in regard to his board.” The case of LaFontain v. … In that case, as in this, board was not furnished in consideration of a promise of marriage, but, rather, on account of the relations existing between the parties by reason of such a prior promise. In LaFontain v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pratt v. Skolfield

    45 Me. 386 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1858

    Wellington v. Gale, 13 Maine; 483; Williams v. Amory, 14 Maine, 20; Humbert v. Hill, 41 Maine, 475. … Baker v. Parker, 4 Pick. 505 ; Hunt v. Hunt, 14 Pick. 374 ; Freeman v. McGaw, 15 Pick. 82 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lovell Ex Rel. Estate of Lovell v. One Bancorp, Maine Savings Bank

    755 F. Supp. 466 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 18, 1991

    In Reese v. … In re Estate of Brown, 421 So.2d at 753 . 2 Even in Mayfield v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Maine State Employees Ass'n

    499 A.2d 1228 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 29, 1985

    In State v. MLRB, 413 A.2d 510 (Me.1980), we affirmed the Board’s order to negotiate the impact of holiday openings of liquor stores. … The court reversed the NLRB, distinguishing such cases as General Electric Co. v. NLRB, 414 F.2d 918 (4th Cir.1969) and Timken Roller Bearing Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Town of Vassalboro v. Barnett

    13 A.3d 784 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 15, 2011

    See Efstathiou v. … See Sahl v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dunham v. Rackliff

    71 Me. 345 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1880

    In a recent case in this State, Foster v. … It is not alleged or protended that either the plaintiff or defendant had anything to do with Brown’s stable or the light therein.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • William A. Horton v. Town of Casco

    82 A.3d 1217 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 19, 2013

    Therefore, we review the decision of the Planning Board as the operative decision. See Mills v. … Town of Union v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • JPP, LLC v. Town of Gouldsboro

    961 A.2d 1103 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 30, 2008

    DISCUSSION [¶ 8] The interpretation of a local ordinance by a planning board is a question of law that we review de novo. Bodack v. Town of Ogunquit, 2006 ME 127, ¶ 6 , 909 A.2d 620, 622 . … See Jordan v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Parsons v. Inhabitants of Monmouth

    70 Me. 262 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 10, 1879

    Willey v. Greenbush, 30 Maine, 452. Sturtevant v. Libbey, 46 Maine, 457. Emery v. Mariaville, 56 Maine, 315. Bessey v. Unity, 65 Maine, 342. Any view counter to this in Chamberlain v. … For the facts reported utterly fail to satisfy us that the money received by Brown from the plaintiff ever went for the benefit of the town; but from the testimony of Brown himself we feel confident that it went in part to

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Town of Warren Ambulance Service v. Maine Department of Public Safety

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 13, 2006

    Seider v. Board of Exam'r of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206 ¶ 9, 762 A.2d 551, 555 (Me. 2000) (citing CWCO, Inc. v. … See generally Traxler v. State of Maine, Dep't of Corrections, Kenn. Docket No. CV-00-113 (Jan. 10, 2001) (Studstrup, 1.); Brown v. Genesee County Bd. of Comm'rs, 628 N.W.2d 471 (M. 2001).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Rodriques v. Maine State Retirement System

    691 A.2d 1205 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 1, 1997

    Sargent Inc. v. … Me.S.Retirement Systems Rules Ch. 507 (Sept. 28,1993). [¶ 10] The Board in its brief concedes that Bischoff v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.