Case law

BROWN & BROWN ENTERPRISES, LLC v. Brown

698 S.E.2d 201 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 9, 2010

698 S.E.2d 201 (2010) BROWN & BROWN ENTERPRISES, LLC v. BROWN. No. COA09-1665. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed July 20, 2010. Certification Date August 9, 2010. Case Reported Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

Felder's Collision Parts, Inc. v. All Star Advertising Agency, Inc.

777 F.3d 756 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 27, 2015

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 (1962). Though often included by rote, the axiom is particularly apt in this case. … Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 224 (1993); Stearns Airport Equip. Co., Inc. v. FMC Corp., 170 F.3d 518, 532 (5th Cir. 1999). I.

Holrail, LLC v. Surface Transportation Board

515 F.3d 1313 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 2008

Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994). “In determining whether a statutory provision speaks directly to the question before us, we consider it in context.” Holly Sugar Corp. v. Johanns, 437 F.3d 1210, 1213 (D.C. … Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.

Brown v. Brown & Co.

25 Tenn. App. 509 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 5, 1941

As held in McDonnell v. Amo, 162 Tenn., 36, 41 , 34 S. … See Mitchell v. Schulte et al., 142 Ark., 446, 222 S. W., 365, 369 , 10 A. L. R., 887, cited in Henderson et al. v. Watson et al, supra. And see, also, Fleming v. Greener, 173 Ind., 260 , 90 N. E., 72, 73 , 140 Am. St.

Drury Chesterfield, Inc. v. Muehlheausler

347 S.W.3d 107 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 2011

Savage v. State Tax Comm’n of Mo., 722 S.W.2d 72, 74 (Mo. banc 1986), quoting State ex rel. Cassilly v. Riney, 576 S.W.2d 325, 328 (Mo. banc 1979). … Friedman v.

Brown v. Brown

473 So. 2d 851 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 4, 1984

Nethken v. Nethken, supra; Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans [ 246 La. 893 ], 168 So.2d 595 (La.1964). … We are aware of the language used by this Court in Brown v.

Brown v. Brown

604 So. 2d 932 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 21, 1992

Buttermore v. Meyer, 559 So.2d 357, 359 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), the order appealed is AFFIRMED. JOANOS, C.J., and ERVIN and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Patel

988 So. 2d 957 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 5, 2007

Ex parte Steadman , 812 So.2d 290 , 293 (Ala. 2001) (citing Pryor v. Brown Root USA, Inc. , 674 So.2d 45 , 47 (Ala. 1995)). … The MEDS parties, as did the Court of Civil Appeals, rely upon Gregory v.

Brown v. Brown

119 Utah 429 · Utah Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1951

Brown, respondent herein, was granted a divorce from Thomas E. Brown, appellant herein. … District Court of Cache County, 68 Utah 220 , 249 P. 806 , and Parish v. McConkie, 84 Utah 396 , 35 P. 2d 1001 as authority for this contention.

In Re Housing Authority of City of Salisbury

235 N.C. 463 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 30, 1952

The College Board of Trustees, after considering the proposal, reached the conclusion and so notified the Housing Authority that they could not consent for any part of the campus to be put to use as a public housing site, … Price v. Whisnant, 232 N.C. 653 , 62 S.E. 2d 56 ; Sprinkle v. Reidsville, ante, 140; S. v. Murphy, post, 503.

Brown v. Brown

171 N.C. App. 365 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 5, 2005

The 14 July 2004 order is the subject of a corollary appeal in Brown v. Brown, ___ N.C. App. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (filed 5 July 2005, COA04-1189). … Because the 14 July 2004 order on contempt must be vacated for the reasons set forth in Brown v. Brown, ___ N.C.

Brown v. Brown

732 So. 2d 1169 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 20, 1999

Because prejudgment interest ordinarily pertains only from the date of loss, Argonaut Ins. v. … See Lake Placid Holding Co. v. Paparone, 414 So.2d 564 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Worldwide Development-Kendale Lakes West v. Lot Headquarters, 305 So.2d 271 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974).

Smith v. Brown

10 Vet. App. 330 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jun 13, 1997

Barnett v. Brown, 83 F.3d 1380, 1383 (Fed.Cir.1996); see also Johnson (Anne) v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 25, 27 (1994) (per curiam order); Zevalkink v. … See Phillips v. Brown, 10 Vet.App. 25, 30 (1997) (citing Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 , 66 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 (1946)); Breslow v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 560, 562 (1993).

Brown v. Brown

226 Va. 320 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Dec 2, 1983

Quoting Jansson v. … Acts 1979, ch. 356. 2 Ford v. Wooten was decided subsequent to the trial court’s decision in the instant case. 3 This case does not come under the Jones Act because Brown was not a seaman.

Brown v. Brown

73 Iowa 430 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 14, 1887

The mortgage in question, under which the sale was made, was executed to James Brown by Joshua Brown and wife alone. … gets only the undivided two-fifths interest of Joshua Brown.

Brown v. Brown

365 P.2d 385 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1961

Brannon v. Brannon, 207 Okl. 529 , 250 P.2d 447 . … Johnson v. Grady County, 50 Okl. 188 , 150 P. 497 ; Loeser v. Loeser, 50 Okl. 249 , 150 P. 1045 .

Brown v. Brown

181 Ark. 528 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 7, 1930

Mank v. Green

323 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, D. Maine · May 24, 2004

Co. v. … Cohen v. Brown University, 101 F.3d 155, 169 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1186 , 117 S.Ct. 1469 , 137 L.Ed.2d 682 (1997).

Brown v. Brown

95 Ohio Misc. 2d 38 · Belmont County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 30, 1998

Brown and his wife, Ruth M. Brown (plaintiff herein), together with his sisters (defendants herein), created a joint survivorship tenancy pursuant to R.C. 5302.17 and 5302.20. … Brown and Ruth M. Brown are now deceased. Upon the death of William M. Brown on July 7, 1996, his survivorship tenancy therein vested in plaintiff and defendants as the remaining joint survivorship tenants.

Davis v. Davis

291 Ark. 473 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 16, 1987

Brown, sent a precedent to the court in the amount of $24,761.14. … In the case of Lane v.