Case law

Brown v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.

69 Mo. App. 418 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1897

Briggs v. R. R., 111 Mo. 168 . The ruling is sustained by Vaughn v. Scade, 30 Mo. 600 . It follows that the judgment must be reversed. In view of a probable retrial it is proper to notice other assignments of error. … Brown v. Wood, 19 Mo. 475 ; Harvey v. Herriman, 39 Mo. App. 214 . Admissibility of copy of telegram and bill of lading: harmless error.

Hagen v. Perryville Board of Aldermen

550 S.W.2d 797 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1977

Louis v. Koontz, 516 S.W .2d 502 (Mo.App.1974); Moore v. Damos, 489 S.W.2d 465 (Mo.App.1972); State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. Masters, 512 S.W.2d 150 (Mo.App.1974). … Ace Mining & Milling Co. v. R. U. Mining Co., 247 S.W. 172 (Mo.1922); State v. Ray, 225 S.W. 969 (Mo. 1920); Baker v. Baker, 274 S.W.2d 322 (Mo.App.1954); Davis v. Davis, 354 S.W.2d 526, 531 (Mo.App.1962).

Board of Public Utilities v. Fenton

669 S.W.2d 612 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1984

The transformer was the property of the plaintiff Board of Public Utilities. … Cantrell, an electrical engineer employed by the plaintiff Board of Public Utilities.

Chapman v. Board of Probation & Parole

813 S.W.2d 370 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1991

The decision of the Personnel Advisory Board is reviewed as if it had been directly appealed. Fujita v. Jeffries, 714 S.W.2d 202, 204 (Mo.App.1986). The decision of Personnel Advisory Board is affirmed. … Belton v. Board of Police Comm’rs, 708 S.W.2d 131, 137 (Mo. banc 1986). Due process also requires that all information presented to the fact finder be made available to all parties. Tullock v. City of St.

Coltin v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

240 S.W.3d 733 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2007

Rochelle Coltin appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole.

State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brown Builders Electrical Co.

254 S.W.3d 31 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 20, 2008

See Verni v. … See, e.g., Bonney v. Envtl.

Liddell v. Board of Education

696 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Aug 5, 1988

The City Board has filed a reply to the State’s Response, L(2085)88. Rockwood requests a two-year extension to meet its Plan Ratio. This extension has been agreed to by Rockwood, both plaintiffs and the City Board. … If the plaintiffs and the City Board have agreed to assist Rock-wood, then this Court will not interfere.

Menees v. National Super Markets, Inc.

863 S.W.2d 378 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1993

of Rose Brown rather than the one-seventh share of that amount paid with court approval to William Brown. … Comm’n. v. Copeland, 820 S.W.2d 80, 84 (Mo.App.1991).

Liddell v. Board of Education

771 F. Supp. 1493 · District Court, E.D. Missouri · Jun 27, 1991

The State and the City Board have filed responses. L(3443)91 and L(3444)91, respectively. The City Board has also filed a reply to the State’s response. L(3458)91. … Anything beyond this is left to the City Board alone to fund.

Puterbaugh v. Township Board of Education

53 Mo. 472 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1873

And all contracts, made by the local directors under the provisions of this section, must be reported to the Township Board of Education, &c. … Section ten of the same law makes the Township Board of Education “a body politic and corporate” with power to sue and be sued.

Gerrard v. Board of Election Commissioners

913 S.W.2d 88 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1995

See, Gasconade R-III School District v. Williams, 641 S.W.2d 444 (Mo.App.E.D.1982), Clark v. Trenton, 591 S.W.2d 257 (Mo.App.W.D.1979); Marre v. Reed, 775 S.W.2d 951 (Mo. banc 1989); Eversole v. … Board of Election Commissioners v. Knipp, 784 S.W.2d 797, 798 (Mo. banc 1990). A new election is a drastic remedy. Id.

United States v. Brown (In re Sapp)

98 B.R. 481 · District Court, W.D. Missouri · Apr 4, 1989

Art I, § 26, Morgan v. Willman, 318 Mo. 151 , 1 S.W.2d 193, 195 (1927). … Cassville School Dist. v. McArtor, 286 S.W. 729 , 731 (Mo.App.1926), Kansas City v. Kansas City Elevated Ry. Co., 110 Mo. App. 647 , 85 S.W. 681, 682 (1905).

Board of Election Commissioners v. Knipp

784 S.W.2d 797 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 1990

Jackson County v. Waltner, 340 Mo. 137 , 100 S.W.2d 272, 275 (banc 1936). See also State ex rel. Wilson v. … Hockemeier v. Berra, 641 S.W.2d 67, 68 (Mo. banc 1982).

Roy D. Brown v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 2, 2020

BROWN, ) No. … This Court affirmed the movant’s conviction on direct appeal in State v. Brown, 558 S.W.3d 105 (Mo. App. E.D. 2018).  The movant timely filed a pro se motion for post-conviction relief on November 9, 2018.

Shirley S. Brown v. Stephen L. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals · May 12, 2020

In support of this argument Brown relies on HGS Homes, Inc. v Kelly Residential Group, Inc., 948 S.W.2d 251 (Mo. App. E.D. 1997). … Parker v. Pulitzer Pub. Co., 882 S.W.2d 245, 250 (Mo. App. E.D. 1994); Bolton v. Bolton, 950 S.W.2d 268, 271 (Mo. App.

Brown v. Chicago, Rock Island Pacific R.R. Co.

231 Mo. App. 126 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 1936

[Higgins v. Heine Boiler Co., 328 Mo. 493 , 41 S.W.2d 565 ; Wheeler v. Missouri Pacific R.R. Co., 328 Mo. 888 , 42 S.W.2d 579 , and cases cited therein.] … Our conclusions are in harmony with the principle announced in the following cases: O'Malley v. Mack International Truck Corporation, 31 S.W.2d 554 ; Bruce v. Missouri, Kansas Texas Ry. Co., 73 S.W.2d 425 ; De Tienne v.

Summers v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

299 S.W.2d 883 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 7, 1957

Neither party requested the Board to make a finding on that issue. Therefore, failure to make such a finding is not error. Carroll Construction Company v. Kansas City, Mo.App., 278 S.W.2d 817, 821 . … Carroll Construction Company v. Kansas City, supra, 820 . It is urged that the Board was not authorized to act in this case, under the variance provisions of the ordinances.

Edger v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

307 S.W.3d 718 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 2010

Fourteen CSR 80-2.010 sets forth the guidelines under which the Parole Board is to determine the parole eligibility of an offender. Cooper v. Holden, 189 S.W.3d 614, 618 (Mo.App. W.D.2006). … by the Board.”

Mary Noel v. Board of Election

465 S.W.3d 88 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 2015

Brown v. Carnahan, 370 S.W.3d 637, 646 (Mo. banc 2012) (citing Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.3d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976)). A determination of the constitutional validity of a statute is a question of law we review de novo. … Brown, 370 S.W.3d at 645, quoting United Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n of Mo. v. Nixon, 19 S.W.3d 137, 139 (Mo. banc 2000).

Moore v. Board of Police Commissioners

267 S.W.3d 749 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2008

.; and Ricky Thomas (collectively Appellants) appeal from the circuit court’s judgment granting the Board of Police Commissioners’ and Troy Taylor’s (collectively Respondents) Motion for Directed Verdict on Appellants’ Petition